DS Big Brother Nintendo knows what's been in your 3DS

Discussion in 'Gaming' started by themax, 9 Mar 2011.

  1. BRAWL

    BRAWL Dead and buried.

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    186
    I think most airlines now have enough sheilding around crewed area's and important area's that you can basically use any tech where you want. Well I sat there with my cellphone and media player last time... so.
     
  2. zelachang

    zelachang What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Honestly I couldn't care less if this is true. I have a DS to play games, I buy the games, Nintendo doesn't care that I'm playing legit games, ergo no problem. I'm guessing that for 98% of people that own a DS and pays for their games legitimately this is a nonissue. Compared to DRM like Ubisoft's where 100% of people paying legitimately have a worse experience compared to a pirate this is awesome. Nintendo doesn't care that they pissed off a few thousand internet geeks and the few thousand internet geeks probably don't care that much because they'll just circumvent this DRM anyways.
     
  3. BRAWL

    BRAWL Dead and buried.

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    186
    Way to miss the point.
     
  4. boiled_elephant

    boiled_elephant Merom Celeron 4 lyfe

    Joined:
    14 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    6,924
    Likes Received:
    1,198
    Yeah, there are concerns about this for legitimate customers. Wanting to turn off the whoreish wireless function on the device in your pocket sometimes - to avoid being bombarded by advertising, for security, or just to save a lot of battery life - is a reasonable want. There's also the false-positive concern: systems like this usually misfire occasionally and mistake legal tinkering for illegal piracy (Steam does it quite a lot). And when an intrusive DRM system like this makes a mistake, it ****s all of your **** up until you can convince them you're not a pirate - which is a complicated thing to prove.

    There's a plain objection of principle too concerning this ability of theirs to turn off the console. The issue is not how they use this ability - nobody's saying they shouldn't try to prevent piracy. The issue is that the ability exists at all. Regardless of how it's used - even if it's never used - that ability is a violation and a domination just by its existence.

    http://nzphilosophy.blogspot.com/2006/01/pettits-freedom-as-non-domination.html
     

Share This Page