|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Just another nobody
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,671
![]() |
Apple launches Intel-powered MacBook Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I also ride trials :¬)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallowfield, Manchester
Posts: 2,233
![]() |
I think you need to look at the hyperlink in the article
![]() I'm very jealous, these look like absolutely awsome machines. I can't really comprehend something 4 times faster than my Powerbook. But I don't like the name at all.
__________________
Carrot cake cheesecake Shuttle SN85G4V2 | A64 3200+ / Apple PowerBook 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Design Warrior
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,514
![]() ![]() |
I haven't used a PowerBook extensively: would 4x faster actually make a difference for the applications you would normally run on them? I tried browsing photos on a G4 pb, which was a very poor experience (took ages to load each one, they can't have been more than 1MB each) but I assumed that was because of the harddisk spinning down, as it was on batteries. Would the Intel processor have fixed this?
A few more questions: How do you install windows without a floppy drive? They use SATA... but call it Serial ATA/100 What's an "ExpressCard/34 slot"? What's the battery life like? It has a 60-watthour battery, compared with the 72 in my first-gen Centrino Dell which does 3.5 hours. Can we expect 2.5 hours? ch424 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ch424, Intel SATA ports are natively supported by Windows XP so you don't need to install SATA drivers via a driver disk.
Also, I would have thought that Yonah/Napia have much better power management/usage than the current Dothan/Sonoma platforms.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 404
![]() |
Dual core on the go. Talk about power on the go. I am a big mac fan. I love love them. Although many times they have done things I don't like. But I like dual core on a laptop though.
__________________
Project Log: Knight Rider CWC |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
I Mod, Therefore I Own
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London
Posts: 3,587
![]() |
Quote:
when less than full load the DC yonah outlasted the dothan ![]() i really want a lenovo/ibm core duo based laptop :drool: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 799
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hitchin, Herts
Posts: 73
![]() |
So..are Apple finally admitting that the current range of macs were pathetically poor performance wise as running a dual core mobile P4 gives them 4x the performance of the old Mac?
So a normal single core chip should be 2x the performance over their old Macs.. Which is what most normal *IE - non mac zealots* have been saying for years.. ![]() Simon/~Flibster
__________________
"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die of asphyxication in deep space that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young." "Why, what did she tell you?" "I don't know, I didn't listen." Douglas Adams - Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy - My Hexus Rating Click here to email me |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,294
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you still find it underpowered, the great thing is you can buy an Intel Duo 2.16 and upgrade it, yea? Or wont the mobo support the multiplier increase you recon?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
\o/
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: England
Posts: 5,222
![]() |
Apple's share price! Rather amusing.
__________________
Denying Rights to Music lovers. Denying Rights to Movie lovers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Gravity hates Bacon
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 1,554
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Srenob is deader than dead, so check out my new blog instead: http://i-have-a-blog-now.blogspot.com/ (Note - there's not much there yet, but maybe there will be someday.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,294
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cant remember, but Apple have said for a while that you will be able to do it. Buy a Mac laptop with Mac OS and then been able to use Windows should you absoultely need to still, for those softwares currently only on windows. Makes economic sense and eases the transition to a Mac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Trust the Computer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,797
![]() |
The possibility of dual booting with XP (and Vista if it's supported) is incredibly tempting...but the price is still very off putting
Never been a great fan of Macs anyway, but this seems to be bridging the gap a bit. It'll be nice when there isn't any rivalry between pc and mac users to be honest, the bitching has got a bit boring now...<A88> |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
I also ride trials :¬)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallowfield, Manchester
Posts: 2,233
![]() |
Quote:
Apple have said they will not stop anyone putting Windows on their machines, but that doesn't mean it will be straightforward. Shuttle didn't say I couldn't put OS X on my Machine, but it isn't easy. I know that's a bit different, but just because Apple won't stop you, doesn't mean that you can just stick in the Windows disks and off you go. I guess we'll have to wait and see. Are they actually shipping these now? I am intruiged as to exactly what you can do with them.
__________________
Carrot cake cheesecake Shuttle SN85G4V2 | A64 3200+ / Apple PowerBook 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 122
![]() |
Well, the PowerMac (PPC) was initially faster then the Pentiums... But that was when the G4 was still a new chip.
The only PPC that was pretty crappy compared to Intell or whatever PC-chip, is the G5. Not because it's lack of power, but it's insane heatproblems. The chip itself had the possibility to be fast, if it weren't for those heatproblems. So it's not really like the entire PPC-line was slower then the Pentiums, it's only the G5 that sucked. Some guy named Schiller (if i'm right) , who works at Apple, said that the IntelMacs will run Windows without a (major) problem. Some minor technical knowledge might be nessesery to run it, but they won't try and stop you ![]() These are available for ordering, but will probably ship in February
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Evil Teddy
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,485
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
modding.gordyhand.co.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
...like a geek!
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 15,115
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A laptop that runs Windows XP but with the design and build quality of a Powerbook?
Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!
__________________
"You actually hope to achieve your ideals, I just use mine as an excuse to hate everything" --specofdust "There is no Real Life, only Away From Keyboard" --gpw111 "...my wife says I can't have any trolls, cause they argue with the dog and eat the fish" --KayinBlack |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 505
![]() |
Quote:
Remember (mac fan as I am) you have to take Apple benchmarking with a teaspoon of salt.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|