bit-tech.net

Gareth Halfacree · 25th Jan 2013, 09:19

Pretty graphs break down complex metrics.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20.../cpuboss-com/1

Hustler · 25th Jan 2013, 09:28

Ughhh!!!...why are they using the 32bit Cinebench, has the x64bit version escaped their notice or something.

billysielu · 25th Jan 2013, 09:41

For a site that's meant to simplify things, it's quite complicated.

the_kille4 · 25th Jan 2013, 10:17

The colour coding needs to work better. It's not in sync for half of the results so it makes the comparison confusing. Utilising a better way to find the processors might be one as well. Searching through the various options for each category makes it even harder to find a potential processor that one might need. Finally, one more thing. That is to have up to perhaps four comparisons.

Tattysnuc · 26th Jan 2013, 08:52

Interesting concept, but face it, it's a site to CPU reviews. I prefer Bit-tech and Hexus review metrics...

25th Jan 2013, 09:19	#1
Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! bit-tech Staff Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Bradford, UK Posts: 1,850	CPUBoss.com looks to simplify processor comparison Pretty graphs break down complex metrics. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20.../cpuboss-com/1 __________________ Co-author, Raspberry Pi User Guide, Meet the Raspberry Pi \| gareth.halfacree.co.uk \| twitter bit-tech news correspondent, Custom PC columnist I'm a filthy freelancer! Hire me!

25th Jan 2013, 09:41	#3
billysielu [Mike] sn\|per Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 157	For a site that's meant to simplify things, it's quite complicated. __________________ [Mike] sn\|per

25th Jan 2013, 10:17	#4
the_kille4 Chaos will rule da world.eventually Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Near the equator Posts: 200	The colour coding needs to work better. It's not in sync for half of the results so it makes the comparison confusing. Utilising a better way to find the processors might be one as well. Searching through the various options for each category makes it even harder to find a potential processor that one might need. Finally, one more thing. That is to have up to perhaps four comparisons. __________________ Headphones/set: Grado SR325i \| AKG K240 MK II \| Shure SRH 840 \| Razer Tiamat 7.1 Soundcard: Creative ZxR \| Creative Fatal1ty Pro Surround Amp: Onkyo TX-SR604 Speakers: Ceed 682F (Front) \| Q Acoustics 2010i (Side) \| Q Acoustics 1010i (Rear) \| Q Acoustics 1000Ci (Center) \| Q Acoustics 1000Si (Sub)

bit-tech.net

Site Links

Our Other Sites

25th Jan 2013, 09:28	#2
Hustler Supermodder Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: The Dark Side Posts: 451	Ughhh!!!...why are they using the 32bit Cinebench, has the x64bit version escaped their notice or something.

26th Jan 2013, 08:52	#5
Tattysnuc Thinking about which mod to do 1st. Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Liverpool Posts: 1,098	Interesting concept, but face it, it's a site to CPU reviews. I prefer Bit-tech and Hexus review metrics...