1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Networks Which Network cable for >100Mbit

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Leesy1, 31 Jan 2014.

  1. Leesy1

    Leesy1 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    97
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hey all. At some point this year I am going to run ethernet cable from my bedroom down to the lounge for the Conoles etc and a new laptop.

    I'm on Virgin Media and at some point I'm sure it will go above 100Mbit/s. Which Cat cable do I need ? 5, 5e or 6 then?. For some reason I though 5s max was 100Mbit. If someone could explain which one that would be great :).

    Lee
     
  2. deathtaker27

    deathtaker27 Modder

    Joined:
    17 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    2,238
    Likes Received:
    186
  3. Sentinel-R1

    Sentinel-R1 Chaircrew

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    408
  4. narwen

    narwen narwen

    Joined:
    6 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    387
    Likes Received:
    12
    i would go cat6 for future proofing
     
  5. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    cat6, or if you really want to future proof, cat7 is available but is rather expensive
     
    Last edited: 1 Feb 2014
  6. rollo

    rollo Modder

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    131
    100mbit is aprox 10mb download a sec, cat 5 will do gigabyte speeds in 1 meter cable range.

    Cat 5e is 1000mbit ( the days uk internet hits that sort of speed are not gonna be in our lifetime)

    Cat 6 is 10x that and is rather a waste of cash in a standard home.

    Cat 7 is 10x that again.

    If all you want it for is internet 5e is fine and dandy. Uk internet will never ever hit this speed.
     
  7. Harlequin

    Harlequin Modder

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    7,131
    Likes Received:
    194
    you want cat 6 - I was speed limited on cat 5e with 330mb/s FTTH
     
  8. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    it's not all about internet though is it, local network traffic could easily top internet traffic speeds
     
  9. rollo

    rollo Modder

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    131
    He said it was, and as I said at the end of my post if all you use is Internet which is normal for most households then cat6+ is a waste of cash.
     
  10. Leesy1

    Leesy1 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    97
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thx guys. I think I'll go with Cat 5e :).
     
  11. Andy Mc

    Andy Mc Modder

    Joined:
    23 May 2002
    Posts:
    1,743
    Likes Received:
    133
    Ignoring the speed aspect of cat 6 it also benefits for better protection against cross talk/interference.
     
  12. Harlequin

    Harlequin Modder

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    7,131
    Likes Received:
    194
    ^^ get some good shielded cat 6 - or you`ll have to rerun when you realise cat5e isn't as good as you want it to be
     
  13. play_boy_2000

    play_boy_2000 ^It was funny when I was 12

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    146
    Cat6 - maybe, if you think 10GigE may be a future requirement or your runs are over 60M and you want piece of mind on gigabit. Otherwise cat5e is fine
    shielded - no, unless you run amateur radio out of your basement. It's a pain in the a$$ to terminate and unless you ground the shield drain properly it makes the entire thing pointless.

    All that being said, as long as you're at it, run 2 cables and a pull string.
     
  14. Deders

    Deders Modder

    Joined:
    14 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    106
    I'd say cat 6 minimum. If there is anything on the network that can't handle gigabit then it will default to 100Mb/s throughout.
     
  15. play_boy_2000

    play_boy_2000 ^It was funny when I was 12

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    146
    Your statement is 100% wrong.

    Please refrain from handing out anymore advice on networking in the future.
     
  16. Deders

    Deders Modder

    Joined:
    14 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    106
    Really? That's what I learned when I did my advanced networking courses.

    Unless a switch is involved, the network will default to the speed of the slowest component.
     
  17. Sentinel-R1

    Sentinel-R1 Chaircrew

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    408
    I believe it's done on link by link basis Deders although I'm no network guru. I do know though, that you can have multiple gigabit-capable devices served full speed whilst others are on 10/100 on the same network. I have this happening in my home as we speak.

    No different to wifi being able to serve one device at G speeds and others at N speeds simultaneously.
     
  18. Deders

    Deders Modder

    Joined:
    14 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    106
    Ahh yes, I believe that is if whatever it's plugged into has auto negotiation. I was working with 10/100 equipment when I did the courses. And routers that have been installed in places I've lived obviously haven't had this feature.
     
    Last edited: 2 Feb 2014
  19. lysaer

    lysaer Suck my unit! Kirk lazarus (2008)

    Joined:
    15 May 2010
    Posts:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    71
    Honestly, for the price of cat6 vs cat5 just go for cat6, it's shielded better

    Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
     
  20. play_boy_2000

    play_boy_2000 ^It was funny when I was 12

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    146
    In real world practice half duplex hasn't been seen since the days of thinnet. Sure you could get 10Base-T and 100baseT hubs, but they never saw any serious deployment (more so the latter) and were virtually non existent by the late 90's. Gigabit hubs simply do not exist.
     

Share This Page