1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

TVs 84" 2160P (4K) 3DTV anyone?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Guest-44432, 19 Dec 2012.

  1. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Check this monster out! Clicky

    [​IMG]

    Make sure to set the video Quality to Original. Even on my 1080p monitor, it looks like 4X supersampling 1080p Quality.


    I think I just....
     
  2. Cei

    Cei pew pew pew

    Joined:
    22 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    122
    I'm looking forward to 4K, but the cost is going to be insane for years to come, combined with the need for a Blu-Ray replacement (or perhaps we'll see multiple layered BD discs or similar). Arguably we might see it on PCs first (at least for gaming) as digital download circumvents limitations of disc size.
     
  3. KidMod-Southpaw

    KidMod-Southpaw Super Spamming Saiyan

    Joined:
    28 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    12,592
    Likes Received:
    558
    That's incredible! Already using 4K wallpapers on my desktop and they're brilliant!
     
  4. dead beat

    dead beat Rippin six 4 life

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    48
    Just when graphics power was reaching the point where you can get away with a single card for a 2560x1600 monitor, the cycle starts all over again.
     
  5. IvanIvanovich

    IvanIvanovich будет глотать вашу душу.

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,870
    Likes Received:
    252
    Quad SLI, you're all set... lol.
     
  6. dead beat

    dead beat Rippin six 4 life

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    48
    Vram requirements will be through the roof haha.
     
  7. Showerhead

    Showerhead What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    11 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    33
    Not sure i'd game on a 84" screen though.
     
  8. dead beat

    dead beat Rippin six 4 life

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    48
    No but imagine how sweet that res would be on 30 - 40".
     
  9. 3lusive

    3lusive Minimodder

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    1,121
    Likes Received:
    45
    That's just jaw dropping. Better than being there.
     
  10. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    They will need to do something. Probably be called ECO-Ray as the next big thing, especially how ECO is such a big marketing gimmick...:D

    Either that, or they will put a 4K film on 4+ Blu-Ray disc...lol

    That's right, it's what keeps us keen in spending our hard earned cash. :D

    That's Quad SLI GTX 980's Maxwell. ;)

    Will be looking at 8GB GFX cards for that res. :D

    What? Sitting 3 meters away with that res and screen size would be immense! ;)

    Yep, but not as immense as the 84" variety towering around your peripheral vision. :D
     
  11. fuus

    fuus Misses Rep Bombs

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    546
    I think I should scissor my debit card right now.
     
  12. samkiller42

    samkiller42 For i AM Cheesecake!!

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    538
    Films are starting to be filmed in 5k, so 4k shouldn't be too far away i feel.

    That 84" LG is around £20,000 though, so if you have that amount of money burning away in your pocket, and a room the size of a small cinema, should be fine :thumb:

    Sam
     
  13. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,284
    Likes Received:
    183
    Whats the price I wonder.


    oops didnt see the post above
     
    Last edited: 19 Dec 2012
  14. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Nah, anyone who wants a partition in their room, would go for the 84" TV.

    Look love, I spent £20K on giving you a dressing room. The TV is part of the wall...:D
     
    fuus likes this.
  15. GeorgeK

    GeorgeK Swinging the banhammer Super Moderator

    Joined:
    18 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    515
    lol - made me think of this



    Edit: And, yes, that is absolutely stunning... :jawdrop:
     
  16. fuus

    fuus Misses Rep Bombs

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    546
    Simon, you make my Wednesday so much more amusing. +rep.
     
  17. dancingbear84

    dancingbear84 error 404

    Joined:
    16 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    2,192
    Likes Received:
    73
    Dear Simon,
    As I live in the same county as yourself, I would like to call dibs on this, I mean lets me honest we all know you'll buy it, then after OC'ing the nuts off it and upgrading all the parts you can find :D, buy the Samsung model 6 months later. At which point I will take this LG off your hands, assuming you can deliver it to me. I can't fit it in a 106. I'd cover your petrol money for delivery, but otherwise I'd take it off your hands for nothing....

    Think of it as recycling :thumb:

    Cheers
     
  18. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,284
    Likes Received:
    183
    I'm not seeing much difference between the 1080p and 4k (obviously I don't have the equipment to view it at 4k) I'm thinking whatever happens to make the 4k version appear on my 1080p monitor is the same thing that happens when I select the 1080p version of the video.

    Either way, the quality of the footage is still excellent.
     
  19. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

     
  20. The_Crapman

    The_Crapman World's worst stuntman. Lover of bit-tech

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2011
    Posts:
    7,681
    Likes Received:
    3,941
    yeh pretty much. i watched in on my 42" tv and couldn't really tell there was much of a difference. those with 2560x1440/1600 monitors will though.
     

Share This Page