1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Switched to VM on cpu

Discussion in 'bit-tech Folding Team' started by Scorpuk, 24 Apr 2012.

  1. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    Decided to try folding with the cpu on a Virtual Machine to see what ppd increase there was, if any.

    Setup:
    Using Oracle VM Virtualbox I installed Debian 64bit, Network install from a minimal CD.

    Followed the guide for HPCS, within this forum, to install/setup fah and to get it providing output for HFM.NET.

    When assigning cores to the VM I went for 10 to start with, I may increase at a later date.


    Anywho the before and after ppd.

    v6 console client on windows 7 with 11 cores: ~ 23k ppd
    v6 linux 64 bit client with 10 cores: ~28.5K ppd


    Will try it with 11 cores tomorrow. :)


    :thumb:
     
  2. TaRkA DaHl

    TaRkA DaHl Modder

    Joined:
    15 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    175
    23k PPD on a 3930?

    My 2500k at just 3.6Ghz is getting 25k PPD currently, something must be wrong there...

    What am I missing?
     
  3. debs3759

    debs3759 Was that a warranty I just broke?

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    92
    My 3930K at 4.6 GHz earns around 50K
     
  4. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    What are the options you are running fah with?

    Maybe thats the difference?
     
  5. TaRkA DaHl

    TaRkA DaHl Modder

    Joined:
    15 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    175
    Just:

    FAH.exe -smp

    I haven't even specified the cores to use.
     
  6. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hmmmm.

    I'll switch to all 12 see what happens.


    You running with gpu too?
     
  7. Tattysnuc

    Tattysnuc Thinking about which mod to do 1st.

    Joined:
    19 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    1,620
    Likes Received:
    60
    It'll depend on the WU too... the points do fluctuate quite a bit....
     
  8. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ahh cheers Tattysnuc.

    Oh well 6hrs until WU P6089 finishes.
     
  9. TaRkA DaHl

    TaRkA DaHl Modder

    Joined:
    15 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    175
    No GPU, the benefit of the points from the GPU reduces the points from the CPU so much it aint worth it.

    Might want to test that yourself, it will also reduce power consumption considerably.
     
  10. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    I'll give that a try in about 2 hours time when the GPU unit finishes.

    It would need to almost double the current ppd for the cpu to break even. :)
     
  11. TaRkA DaHl

    TaRkA DaHl Modder

    Joined:
    15 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    175
    You may find it comes just a few 1000 ppd short, in which case given the 200 or so watt power saving its well worth it in my opinion.

    Or you may not.

    What you could do if it does is buy a dead cheap Atom board or similar and run the gfx card in that for folding if you desperately wanted it crunching :p

    Totally pointless if you want to game though!
     
  12. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
  13. enigmo

    enigmo Kettleboiler Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    13 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just FYI, I saw a PPD increase when moving from Windows based consoles to VMs. As egs:
    On a stock 2600 I also use for work, Windows console used to get around 13-15k ppd. An Ubuntu based VM running in VMWare Workstation, with me doing the same work on the machine, now gets 17-20k ppd, which is a fair % increase.
    Similarly, my Q9550 used to get about 7k ppd. Moving to a similar VM to above got me 9-10k ppd, and then switching again to a bootable folding CD gets me 10k+ all the time, usually closer to 11k.
     
  14. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    15,416
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    giving folding on a VM a try... so far it's slightly lower tpf... but not anything major and i dunno if it's worth the hassle of a vm in the bg for a few extra ppd...

    for reference running [k]ubuntu Precise with the 3.2.0-23-lowlatency kernel, no other tweaks
     
  15. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    Well its coming to the end of its first full WU running on its own with 12 cores and only getting a slight increase in ppd.

    Up by about 9k ppd to ~31k ppd.


    Hmmmm.

    I do have the following additional options that I may turn off:

    -verbosity 9 -advmethods


    Edit:

    Just realised the computer has crashed as of 00:42 last night. :-|
     
    Last edited: 26 Apr 2012
  16. Scorpuk

    Scorpuk Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    725
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hmmmm.

    Went to confirm my passkey and got a new one.

    Maybe this is why?
     
  17. Madness_3d

    Madness_3d Bit-Tech/Asus OC Winner

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    36
    Wonder where these benefits come from being in a VM? Is it just a more efficient client or is there an advantage of them having hypervisor, ring -1, priority?
     
  18. TaRkA DaHl

    TaRkA DaHl Modder

    Joined:
    15 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    175
    Sends a different one every time. But it still applies to yourself.

    Different client runs more efficiently in Linux. So much more so it even passes the overheads of a virtual machine.

    Drop the advmethods and see what happens.
     
  19. Chicken76

    Chicken76 Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    952
    Likes Received:
    32
    Do the benefits of folding on a linux VM apply to AMD CPUs too or are they limited to Intel's?
     
  20. enigmo

    enigmo Kettleboiler Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    13 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    In my experience, it doesn't matter, you'll see a speed bump anyway. AMD chips support virtualisation as well as the Intels do.
     

Share This Page