1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

That cant be right lol!

Discussion in 'bit-tech Folding Team' started by coolamasta, 26 May 2009.

  1. coolamasta

    coolamasta Folding@Home CC Captain 2010/11/12

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    110
    Having a clearout in work and found a few Dell Optiplex PC's with 3ghz Pentium 4 CPU's in.

    Thought I would see how well they would fold so I used Fred's Linux SMP client and VMware player, I had to drop the VM to use 1 CPU and memory to 376mb as the machine only has 512mb to begin with but it booted ok and after an hour of it sat at 100% going up 2% and producing some SERIOUS heat it came back with 126 PPD!!! :jawdrop:

    Yes that was 126 PPD - I didn't leave a number off lol :hehe:

    Is that right do you think? its a Northwood D1 revision CPU (non-hyperthreaded)

    Dont think im going to run them some how unless I can get half decent PPD out of them, anything im missing here? :worried:
     
  2. MrGumby

    MrGumby CPC 464 User

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,437
    Likes Received:
    30
    My working assumption was that core2 at 3ghz is almost twice as a P4 at 3ghz. Depending on the application. What memory is it using? Ive also been told that folding likes memory bandwith. But im a novice at folding so dont quote me.:D
     
  3. Unicorn

    Unicorn Uniform November India

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    12,726
    Likes Received:
    456
    Old CPU architechture, new WU's... I'm guessing that it's about right unfortunately!
     
  4. saspro

    saspro IT monkey

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    404
    Sounds right, SMP on 1 CPU shouldn't work though?

    P4's are only good for the standard client or as mules for GPU's
     
  5. DocJonz

    DocJonz Another CPC refugee .....

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,202
    Likes Received:
    97
    I had a P4 660, and it used to produce an average 510 PPD - though on some WU's it only produced 90 PPD!! :lol:
     
  6. Deadpunkdave

    Deadpunkdave ...why you need a 20-sided die

    Joined:
    9 May 2009
    Posts:
    193
    Likes Received:
    8
    As I understand it, they decide the credit for CPU work units by running them on a P4 @ 2.8GHz and multiplying the number of days taken by 220 i.e. a P4 @ 2.8 GHz earns 220ppd across all WU. I'm not sure if they normalise the SMP client WUs in the same way (I would guess they don't) but as a rough guide, that's what you can expect from older CPUs.
     
  7. SazBard

    SazBard 10 PRINT "C64 FTW"

    Joined:
    28 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    328
    Likes Received:
    5
    my athlon xp2600+ produces more than that!

    What memory does it have? ddr2 533?

    Also it may give a rubbish ppd figure at first, but once it completes a wu, it should go up.

    It's not worth using smp client because it will never finish the wu before the deadline.
     
  8. Thaifood

    Thaifood Minimodder

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    855
    Likes Received:
    40
    err my althon 6000 has got project 4438 and it says my ppd is 137!!
     
  9. coolamasta

    coolamasta Folding@Home CC Captain 2010/11/12

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    110
    Ah well after some of the things you all said then it must be about right so im not going to bother wasting the electricity on running them for such little PPD.

    Makes me laugh about how crap the PPD is yet the heat being pumped out is just silly! :hehe:
     
  10. coolamasta

    coolamasta Folding@Home CC Captain 2010/11/12

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    110
    Done another test today - I decommissioned an old IBM server which has dual P4 Xeon CPU's, they are 2.4ghz each with hyperthreading so 4 x cpus appear in task manager.

    Stuck a fresh copy of 2003 server on and the SMP client and can anyone guess its PPD?
    Will spill the beans tomorrow...
     
  11. Unicorn

    Unicorn Uniform November India

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    12,726
    Likes Received:
    456
    less than 700 per client (i.e. per dual core CPU)?
     
  12. Norfolk'N'Good

    Norfolk'N'Good Folding Chimp

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    278
    Likes Received:
    4
    My guess is 480.:D
     
  13. coolamasta

    coolamasta Folding@Home CC Captain 2010/11/12

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    110
    The server both CPU's / hyperthreading at 100% load produce a whopping....

    370 PPD!!!!!!!!!!!

    Shocking lol :hehe: :lol: :hehe: :lol: :duh:
     
  14. Votick

    Votick My CPU's hot but my core runs cold.

    Joined:
    21 May 2009
    Posts:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    109

    lol mines a bit crap too on my CPU hehe xD
     
  15. Unicorn

    Unicorn Uniform November India

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    12,726
    Likes Received:
    456
    I know every point counts, but I decided a long time ago that my single core A64 wasnt worth running for 400PPD considering the TDP of the chip and the amount of electricity that it was costing to run that rig! Inefficient little bugger of a CPU :p
     

Share This Page