1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Intel announces Thunderbolt Ready upgrade programme

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 19 Nov 2013.

  1. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,085
    Likes Received:
    6,635
  2. Stotherd-001

    Stotherd-001 Minimodder

    Joined:
    15 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    272
    Likes Received:
    8
    why would I want something that size, with an ugly cable required out the back, for ONE thunderbolt port?
     
  3. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    72
    Welcome back to the era of 3DFX Voodoo2 with the main GPU output connected to the 3D accelerator Input ... thanks for this progress Intel :D. I'd rather use a proper PCIe something daughter board.
     
  4. MrJay

    MrJay You are always where you want to be

    Joined:
    20 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    1,290
    Likes Received:
    36
    What a horible afterthought... Atleast there is an option there (of sorts) if you despiratly need it.
     
  5. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,085
    Likes Received:
    6,635
    Oh, it's worse than that: you need a cable from the top of the card (although other manufacturers may locate it on a different edge) to a GPIO port on the motherboard, then another cable from the external part of the card to your motherboard or graphics card's DisplayPort output. Then, of course, a third cable to connect your actual Thunderbolt peripheral(s) up.

    As for having only a single port: remember you can daisy-chain Thunderbolt peripherals.
     
  6. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    Seems a bit like a solution looking for a problem.
    A quick search of a major retailer shows 20 results on thunderbolt products, versus its competition of USB 3 showing 122.
     
  7. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    Must reiterate the prevailing opinion - not really getting the point of this.

    External PCIe has been done before (certain high-end video capture devices put a four lane PCIe device on the end of a DVI cable, which seemed to work), so if you need that, it's doable already. Thunderbolt seems to be an Apple-style attempt to put everything on one connector as if that helps somehow.

    That said, I do wish people would stop comparing Thunderbolt and USB3; they're wildly different.
     
  8. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    72
    It'll just end the same way SCSI ended .... required a controller card, expensive, too few peripheral --> R.I.P.
     
  9. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    In what way are they different, they are both interconnects.
     
  10. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    I'm not so sure if that's really a model; SCSI kept going in higher-end environments until quite recently (and has been replaced by SAS in much the same way as SATA replaced parallel ATA.)

    P
     
  11. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    Thunderbolt, as a data connection, is effectively a raw single PCIe lane, whereas USB has all kinds of intelligence which allows it to do a lot more routing and timesharing. In the broadest possible terms, USB is much "smarter", although obviously there's a downside to that in terms of latency and bandwidth.

    Also, thunderbolt is at least twice and possibly four times the native speed. Thunderbolt includes displayport (for some Appleish reason), too.

    They may under some circumstances allow people to do similar things, but the tech is very different.

    P
     
  12. Teknokid

    Teknokid Minimodder

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    26
    It would be nice if they copied the sony approach and added the optic fibres to a USB port...
     
  13. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    72
    Yes, but in all honestly, beside storage and scanner the SCSI was not used. SCSI was daisy chainable too (via a device ID you has to set on the peripheral).
     
  14. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    And you think your average Jo Blog's cares about how they work ?
    Apart from the small niche use market most people only care if they can use that hole in the front of their PC to plug their shiny new something in.

    I know architecturally they are worlds apart, but most people only care if they can buy what they need for a reasonable price.
     
  15. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    Well, actually, yeah - because the architecture makes it impossible (or at least unreasonably difficult) to create a Thunderbolt PCIe card, which is what everyone keeps asking for. So in that sense yes.
     
  16. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,085
    Likes Received:
    6,635
    That's not a problem from the end-user's perspective, though, but for the manufacturers. "My motherboard doesn't have Thunderbolt, sell me an add-on card." "Sorry, there's no such thing because <technical reason>." "Fine, I'll buy a USB 3.0 PCIe card instead." "Bum."

    Okay, there are a small number of scenarios where the customer would actually respond "damn, I'll buy a new motherboard/hooray, my motherboard is Thunderbolt Ready so I can get an add-on card after all" but for the overwhelming majority of the mainstream market the fact is simple: if Thunderbolt ain't easy to come buy, customers will use USB 3.0 instead.
     
  17. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    Who is this everyone ?
    From what i can tell very few people are asking for a Thunderbolt PCIe card, some people may have a need for one, but my guess is that's a very small market.
     
  18. ajfsound

    ajfsound Minimodder

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    151
    Likes Received:
    7
    Would make more sense for laptops if external GPU's are ever going move from being a niche product...
     
  19. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    72
    If it needs a DP output as as Input and some GPIO ... I do not see why they couldn't make a card which creates a DP (small GPU), but instead of placing the DP connector they could reroute the signal to the DP --> TB stage of the card. Since with Intel solution you can use either the IGP displayPort or one from a discrete GPU ....

    in short PCIe --> Display port --> thunderbolt, all in a single card. Except the possible "too high price tag", I do not see how this is not acievable. This sounds more like a "Do it dirty and cheap" vs "Do it clean but expensive".
     
    Last edited: 19 Nov 2013
  20. -Xp-

    -Xp- Minimodder

    Joined:
    23 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    933
    Likes Received:
    29
    Rather than making these add-on cards, why not provide Thunderbolt as standard on new motherboards? Is there really a huge market for upgrading current motherboards to Thunderbolt? Thunderbolt peripherals are rather limited, I'm sure most people will be happy to wait until thir next upgrade.
     

Share This Page