1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Networks Thoughts

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by RichCreedy, 22 Oct 2014.

  1. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    having upgraded both broadband lines to infinity, I needed a new dual broadband router, so I bought a TP-Link TL-ER5120 to replace my Netgear FVS336G.

    now I wish I could just transfer the firmware from the Netgear to the TP-link.

    the way TP-link and Netgear do things couldn't be anymore different.

    the reason for the change is that the Netgear can't cope with 75MB on each line, and halves the available speed, I have proved it with the TP-Link.

    the problem I am now facing is configuring the peered static ip addresses BT supply, I have to try and convert the way it's done on the Netgear to the way its done on the TP-Link, which is giving me a headache.

    I have around 5 websites hosted on one machine, which use different ports, the Netgear nicely translates and forwards the static ip addresses to the correct port, I can't seem to find a way to do it on the TP-Link.
     
  2. saspro

    saspro IT monkey

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    404
    Check the netgear issue isn't due to a bad mtu setting. I've seen that recently
     
    RichCreedy likes this.
  3. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    the FVS336g can only handle a total of 60Mbps wan to lan

    but thanks for the suggestion
     
  4. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    I just checked mtu, and it wont let me change it from 1492 due to the use of pppoe
     
  5. saspro

    saspro IT monkey

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    404
    1492 + the 8 bits for the PPPoE overhead is correct.

    Had a look at the manual for that gateway and it looks like a nightmare :(
     
  6. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    that's what I thought, the netgear is piss easy to setup, the tp-link on the otherhand, is a nightmare

    I can get it to work as a dual broadband router it's just finding the right settings for the peered static ip addresses
     
  7. saspro

    saspro IT monkey

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    404
    Looks like you need to go to Services

    PPPoE Server

    IP Address Pool

    Then add in your extra IP's.

    Then you can do NAT mappings for port 80 etc on each IP address
     
  8. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    Thanks i'll take a look, and let you know
     
  9. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    think I might give up on the tp-link, "this port has already been assigned" yes I know I want to assign it again to a different static ip address and internal port

    whilst on paper it looks like it should be up to the job I want it to do, it's very restrictive.

    Saspro I tried the things you suggested, it just doesn't work, grr

    if I had separate machines for each website, it will probably work, but I don't have a budget for that
     
    Last edited: 28 Oct 2014
  10. saspro

    saspro IT monkey

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    404
  11. RichCreedy

    RichCreedy Hey What Who

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    4,698
    Likes Received:
    172
    Holy thread resurrection, well actually an update.

    I decided to give up trying to sort the tp-link tl-er5120, so instead bought a Netgear srx5308, which I am glad to say works the way I want it too.

    thanks for your help saspro
     

Share This Page