1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

...

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Guest-56605, 23 May 2012.

  1. Guest-56605

    Guest-56605 Guest

    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 26 Jan 2019
  2. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    724
    Of course a 3770k wouldn't have to run as fast to match a 4.8Ghz 2600k, could be run on air @ 4.6Ghz and that should do it ;) :)
     
    Last edited: 23 May 2012
  3. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    724
    tested mine on air before my Intel water block arrived, 4.6@1.2v it was fine, sure full prime load was up at 90 odd on the hottest core but it never throttled after a couple of hours, water hasn't helped a great deal as the limitation is inside the chip :(
     
  4. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    724
    its nothing to worry about.
     
  5. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    724
    Nice and tidy, everyone seems to do a great job on this site with that, mine is just threw together, wires and tubes everywhere :D One day I will do a better job, one day pigs might fly :D

    I ran the CPC benchmark thing as well to see how I compared with 3770K, I get the same overall score as you exactly @4.8Ghz, my image and video are lower though but multitasking higher.

    Seems all the boards with 3770 on bit techs review do better than mine on image and video when running 4.8 and by a similar margin, I wonder what its dependancy is, whether I can tweak something somewhere for more performance, does it rely on disk performance where I still have spinners rather than SSD, or is my Asus board just not up to the task?
     

Share This Page