bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Jul 2006, 16:19   #1
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
Core 2 Duo: Effects Of Memory Timings

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...timings/1.html

__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 16:29   #2
vengeance
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
vengeance has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Good article.
Lower memory timings had no noticable performance boost for my system. But there was an obvious difference between 1T and 2T timings.
vengeance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 16:35   #3
Lazlow
I have a dremel.
 
Lazlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 1,464
Lazlow has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I'm glad you concluded that there isn't a huge difference between the C3 and C4 sticks. I purchased a pair of 6400 (800MHz) 2gb Corsair C4s the other week for just under 200 and wondered if there is a huge difference between them and the lower latency set.

The C5s were around 160, whereas the C4s were near 200, so I was happy stumping up the extra 40, but the difference in price between the C4s and C3s seemed ridiculous.
__________________
Logs: Red Nineteen|Pink PC
Links: slickhouse.com|Free file upload
Lazlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 16:52   #4
choupolo
Minimodder
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Leeds,UK
Posts: 39
choupolo has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
That's great news for me too. I was just looking into the Core 2 Duo E6600-Asus P5W DH Deluxe-Corsair XMS2 6400CS4 combination. Could be a popular one.
choupolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 17:01   #5
ch424
Design Warrior
 
ch424's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 3,092
ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.
Thanks for that! Bit-Tech myth busters!

However, I don't get the final conclusion: do people knowingly pay 30% more for 1% performance increase?

ch424
__________________
AMD 3780K | Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H | 2x4GB DDR3 | Crucial M4 128GB | 1TB Samsung F1 | Win7 64 | Yuraku YV24WBH1
ch424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 17:19   #6
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
The 6400C3 modules we have are good overclockers and that is similar to what I have seen elsewhere on the web. What I'm basically saying is that memory with tighter timings is going to overclock further than 'standard' CAS4 DDR2. So, if you're looking to overclock, the C3 modules might be attractive if you've got more money than sense.
__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 17:27   #7
ch424
Design Warrior
 
ch424's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 3,092
ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.ch424 is definitely a rep cheat.
Ah, I get it now, thanks.

Edit: Post #1111 \o/
ch424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 18:29   #8
rgkgraphix
Minimodder
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 45
rgkgraphix has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
woo...I got a little worried when I saw this article. I purchased the Corsair Ballistix 4-4-4-12 yesterday, without reading any reviews. Then I saw the headlines and was thinking...aw crap I hope I did well? I feel better now.
__________________
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of floppies.
Mac Pro (2) 2.6 GHz Woodcrests. OSX and XP installed.

Intel DP965LT | Intel E6400 | 1GB A-Data DDR2-667 | CoolMax 500w PSU |
XFX 7600GT | (1) Seagate 7200.9 160GB os | (1)WD 250GB | (2) Hitachi 160GB

Last edited by rgkgraphix; 18th Jul 2006 at 20:23.
rgkgraphix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 18:30   #9
olly_lewis
Hypermodder
 
olly_lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 759
olly_lewis has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Thats one large pile of memory... good roundup, I'm going to go intel in the near future and this is very useful, good roundup...
__________________

My signature dumped me...
___________
olly_lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 20:36   #10
Kipman725
When did I get a custom title!?!
 
Kipman725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,753
Kipman725 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Very usefull, should save some freinds of mine some money
__________________
Sn45g game server mod My Electronics Site
Hardware: 3400+ Sempr0n, 1GB RAM, 1.28TB local storage, x1950pro,Razer Viper,M$ comfort curve 2000,L70S + 17", Fujitsu 17" CRT
Audio: HD-650's, PE congress amp, Sound Blaster AWE64, Soundblaster 24bit
Kipman725 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 20:47   #11
bahgger
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 924
bahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youbahgger - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on you
"Is tighter always better? Do you always get what you pay for? We investigate how much difference memory timings can make to a Core 2 Duo platform. "

Now was the author's thoughts in the first sentence purely on memory timings, or was he feeling a little aroused too? :P
bahgger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 21:00   #12
Highland3r
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 7,473
Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Highland3r is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
The corsair C3 modules also use D9 "fatbody" chips, so scale rather nicely with volts. The BH5 of DDR2 one might say.

Nice roundup
Highland3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 22:09   #13
Cthippo
Can't mod my way out of a paper bag
 
Cthippo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 6,218
Cthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming SaiyanCthippo is a Super Spamming Saiyan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ch424
Edit: Post #1111 \o/
So is your next post #10000?
__________________
Notice: If we see you flaming we will assume you are on fire and take appropriate measures
- The Bit-Tech Fire Brigade.
Cthippo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 22:20   #14
Sea Shadow
aka "Panda"
 
Sea Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 614
Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Sea Shadow is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cthippo
So is your next post #10000?
Also known as #10 or #20

Anyways back on topic: Great article, though it makes me sad to see so much pretty ram to just sit there in a pile like that (even for a photo shoot). Care to send it to a good home?
__________________
My web server is gone, if you find RED x's PM me with a link to the post and I will upload the photo to my bit-tech album and repair the link.

Last edited by Sea Shadow; 18th Jul 2006 at 22:25.
Sea Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 22:32   #15
scq
Hypermodder
 
scq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 879
scq has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Good article. I am personally debating on lower clocks and tighter timings, or higher clocks and more relaxed timings for 2GB kits.

What would you suggest, if I plan to do some light (but not extreme) air overclocking of a Core 2 Duo?

Of course, due to my budget, I couldn't get high clocks and tight timings. I would need to find a sweet spot.

Last edited by scq; 18th Jul 2006 at 22:38.
scq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 23:08   #16
BossBorot
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 7
BossBorot has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
If timings dont matter, as much, then why look at low latency Corsair memory at all? You mentioned overclocking but for that you could just pick up a 2gb set of DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) with decent latency for a lower price. I dont know if this is the case in the uk but some newegg links show what i mean.

DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) 2x1gb http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146114
(might want to get new heatspreaders lol)

DDR2 800 (PC26400) low latency 2x1gb http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820145035

If the Corsair can hold its timings at DDR2 1000 speeds it is prob worth the cash but can it do that?

btw I was surfing the net for a long time, well sence the 14th, looking for memory analysis on conroe way to go bit-tech! now all I need is good comprehensive overclocking analysis !

Last edited by BossBorot; 18th Jul 2006 at 23:37.
BossBorot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jul 2006, 23:44   #17
DeX
Mube Codder
 
DeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,147
DeX has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Great article (needless to say), but it seems people are drawing their own conclusions.

For me it's a no brainer, go with the slowest memory timings, save 100 and buy the faster processor instead. I don't think you mentioned the differences in price between the C3, C4 and PRO, but I'm sure that it's larger than the difference between the E6400 and E6600.

The only reason for buying the C4 or C3 I can see is if you already have the X6800 and want to overclock that as far as it will go. It would be a waste of money to couple the high speed memory with the slightly slower processor given that also have to shell out on expensive heat sinks or watercooler equipment to get any significant improvement in performance by overclocking

I don't know much about memory really but if you had a Core 2 Duo would you have to have DDR2-800 to get the most out of the processor? Is there a significant performance difference between DDR2-533 or 667 and 800?

Edit:
Just looked at the prices of these three modules (guessing from the pictures and slight hints in the article that you were using 2x1GB modules) at newegg. These are the prices of the non PRO versions. You used the PRO version of the C5 in the article although I'm not sure what the difference is supposed to be between them it is no doubt minimal. Here are the prices:

Corsair XMS2-6400C3: $469 (256)
Corsair XMS2-6400C4: $250 (147)
Corsair XMS2-6400C5: $198 (108)

I would also like to go further and compare the above with the lower frequency modules which are even cheaper:
Corsair XMS2-5400C4: $168 (91)
Corsair XMS2-4000C3: $159 (87)

(Edit2: better make sure you add at least 50 over-the-pond poll tax onto those British prices).

Just trying to figure which option has the biggest bang for buck ratio...

Last edited by DeX; 19th Jul 2006 at 00:49.
DeX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jul 2006, 00:49   #18
Renoir
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 190
Renoir has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
My first post.

DeX that is my thinking exactly. At current prices there's no point in paying for fast ram when you could use that money for a faster CPU (unless of course you've bought the x6800 or intend to overclock).

As for the performance differences between different memory frequencies the following article covers 667/800/1066 at various timings and my reading of the results is that there's no significant benefit of even getting better than 667 c5 memory (other than for reasons mentioned above).

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...ng/default.asp

Unfortunately the article doesn't cover 533 ram which is a shame as I'd reckon that could be close to the faster speeds as well. Truth is though that from a practical point of view there is currently very little price premium on 667 over 533 ram so there's not much reason to go lower than 667 and it most likely won't be that long till the same can be said for 800 over 667.

I guess you could look at these results as good (no need for most people to spend loads of money on fast ram) or bad (core 2 duo doesn't currently get much faster even if you throw money at ram). Matter of oppinion I guess.

Would be interesting to see though what affect the higher memory speeds have on integrated graphics especially with aero in vista using the gpu.
Renoir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jul 2006, 00:54   #19
BossBorot
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 7
BossBorot has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeX
Just trying to figure which option has the biggest bang for buck ratio...
all you did is look at corsair. From what you are saying I can presume that you can accept "bad" timings but want high mhz rated speed. If you can buy from newegg these deals look good. I am myself debating what to pick up after reading this article..

(the following prices from USA websites i dont know if what I found relates to the UK as well, as I don't know where you buy you'r stuff)

about $155.50 No rebate 2x1gb DDR2 800 (PC 6400) 5-5-5-15

about $160 AR 2x1gb DDR2 800 (PC 6400) 5-5-5-10

this is a lot cheaper then the $400+ for low latency 2x1gb DDR2 800 (PC6400) kits

Edit: also these deals on DDR2 800 (PC 6400) dont cost much more then the cheapest DDR2 667 (PC 5300) at the same website for compairison you might be able to find even better deals then this is you look around

about $145 No Rebate 2x1gb DDR2 667 (PC 5300) 4-?-?-? w/o heatspreaders.

So basically it looks like DDR2 800 (PC 6400) is worth it, at least in the USA, because there is little price premium over lower speed ram.

Note: all of the ram shown here is the cheapest ram at newegg at each speed, measured in mhz not timings, for 2x1gb pairs at the time of posting. hope this helped

Last edited by BossBorot; 19th Jul 2006 at 01:12.
BossBorot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jul 2006, 01:05   #20
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
whoops, yes I used 2x1GB dual channel kits. The reason I listed the Pro modules is because they're the CAS5-rated modules we've got in the office. I'd be very surprised if you see any performance differences between them and the current 6400C5 modules
__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.