bit-tech.net

ChriX · 15th Oct 2001, 16:54

http://www.sysopt.com/cgi-bin/overc/...i?record=10481 *COUGH*

3.587Ghz with a 3dmark2k : 25842

-c

Koolvin · 15th Oct 2001, 18:01

WoW! seems almost impossible...

what the cooling method?

acron^ · 15th Oct 2001, 18:03

OML!!
Does that break the world record for the most overclocked processor?? Some one phone Guiness!

Phil · 15th Oct 2001, 18:13

personally I think it's a fake...I just don't beleive anything could be oc'ed that high.

acron^ · 15th Oct 2001, 18:19

Well, it's possible, but wouldnt the site demand adequate proof? I mean, it's a nice site, they know what they are doing - in theory if you try hard enough, you should be able to get it that high..

:: kna :: · 15th Oct 2001, 18:41

Hmm, I certainly wouldn't believe it off just reading text on a web page.. I'd want to see snapshots of POST screens, the cooling setup etc before I'd even raise an eyebrow.

Forsaken · 15th Oct 2001, 19:17

ya i thought it looked fake, even with snapshots of the post screens id still not be sure, after all, they are easy to fake

ChriX · 15th Oct 2001, 19:22

I dont think its fake, the must demand proof of something that high. It is a custom motherboard and stuff though. A bus speed higher than P4, hmmmm™

-c

RTT · 15th Oct 2001, 19:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Freddy
Well, it's possible, but wouldnt the site demand adequate proof? I mean, it's a nice site, they know what they are doing - in theory if you try hard enough, you should be able to get it that high..

not quite that simple

physically i dont think a chip could go that far

Forsaken · 15th Oct 2001, 19:27

next to anything on the net can be faked, and that looks way too high to be true to me, thats running 256% over stock, even the % over stock speed looks dodgy

Cheese · 16th Oct 2001, 10:24

I have to say that I am almost 100% sure that that is fake. I've recently seen some people make huge efforts to fake Sandra scores, POST snapshots and 3dmark screenshots and it is all possible...

The score does look v. impressive but I doubt it

r.

p.s. there are more than a few suspicious things... why is the 3dmark 2001 score so low? Low you say... well yes, a 2.5Ghz P4 with a barely overclocked gf3 can do 10000, a 3.7Ghz proc (ish - I forget) should be able to do 18k+! Anyway I don't think we were supposed tot ake it seriously...

Ataraxia · 16th Oct 2001, 10:29

haha.....

Zmaster2k · 16th Oct 2001, 11:14

now waY the ceremic would crack!! it cannot physically go that high

Will · 16th Oct 2001, 19:38

i smell doggy do

take a closer look!

this guy has a 128Mb gf3 - i think not!
is running his bus at 483Mhz DDR - no way!
he has dx9 - naaah!
he has a custom chipset - whatever!
he has a custom motherboard made by abit - um yeah whatever!

lol this is even more of a fib than the claimed 933 p3 at 1800 odd i once saw somewhere

:cool:

Cheese · 16th Oct 2001, 22:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Will2k65

he has dx9 - naaah!

LOL I agree with you on all points but this one - dx9 is easyish to get

Cheers,

r.

ChriX · 17th Oct 2001, 09:19

it IS also possible to get a 128Mb GeForce3 aswell.

Will · 17th Oct 2001, 16:02

Quote:

dx9 is easyish to get

is it? i aint seen it at all yet, i thought we were on dx8.1Astill?

Quote:

it IS also possible to get a 128Mb GeForce3 aswell.

Where from? I have yet to see one or even hear mention of its release, though i deffo think it would be one belter of a card if they are to be released soon

:cool:

six degrees · 18th Oct 2001, 19:13

I WANT ONE I WANT ONE I WANT ONE.

Yes, I want a pc like that.

Cheese · 18th Oct 2001, 22:17

DirectX 9 is currently available for ms beta testers and there's a public sign up for it... so there's bound to be lots and lots of copies of it flying around on warez sites and the lark.

r.

IamChickenlittl · 2nd Nov 2001, 19:11

The physics behind those number just aren't possible. I know Intel has a 3 gig prototype but, I doubt this guys has one...plus theirs is overclocked as well. Anyways I only saw one celeron 300 that doubled it's rate and that guy was pretty good.

It is a fake.

15th Oct 2001, 16:54	#1
ChriX ^ Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: North Cornwall, UK Posts: 2,641	Severe overclocking... http://www.sysopt.com/cgi-bin/overc/...i?record=10481 COUGH 3.587Ghz with a 3dmark2k : 25842 -c

15th Oct 2001, 18:01	#2
Koolvin The Modfather Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: London Posts: 1,656	WoW! seems almost impossible... what the cooling method? __________________ I'm on the case

15th Oct 2001, 18:03	#3
acron^ ePeen++; Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Leamington Spa, UK Posts: 2,938	OML!! Does that break the world record for the most overclocked processor?? Some one phone Guiness! __________________ rage \| portfolio \| email XBL GamerTag: acron0 www.BlitzGamesStudios.co.uk

15th Oct 2001, 18:19	#5
acron^ ePeen++; Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Leamington Spa, UK Posts: 2,938	Well, it's possible, but wouldnt the site demand adequate proof? I mean, it's a nice site, they know what they are doing - in theory if you try hard enough, you should be able to get it that high.. __________________ rage \| portfolio \| email XBL GamerTag: acron0 www.BlitzGamesStudios.co.uk

16th Oct 2001, 10:29	#12
Ataraxia OOH BABY!!! Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Sheffield, UK Posts: 468	haha..... __________________ You remember the outside? It's that big room where the ceiling is sometimes blue, sometimes black, there aren't any keyboards and the graphics are AMAZING! ________________________________________

bit-tech.net

Site Links

Our Other Sites

15th Oct 2001, 18:13	#4
Phil Ultramodder Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Colchester Posts: 1,005	personally I think it's a fake...I just don't beleive anything could be oc'ed that high.

15th Oct 2001, 18:41	#6
:: kna :: POCOYO! Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Purple Posts: 4,209	Hmm, I certainly wouldn't believe it off just reading text on a web page.. I'd want to see snapshots of POST screens, the cooling setup etc before I'd even raise an eyebrow.

15th Oct 2001, 19:17	#7
Forsaken GameFaction.com Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Hull UK Posts: 673	ya i thought it looked fake, even with snapshots of the post screens id still not be sure, after all, they are easy to fake

15th Oct 2001, 19:22	#8
ChriX ^ Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: North Cornwall, UK Posts: 2,641	I dont think its fake, the must demand proof of something that high. It is a custom motherboard and stuff though. A bus speed higher than P4, hmmmm™ -c

15th Oct 2001, 19:27	#10
Forsaken GameFaction.com Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Hull UK Posts: 673	next to anything on the net can be faked, and that looks way too high to be true to me, thats running 256% over stock, even the % over stock speed looks dodgy

16th Oct 2001, 10:24	#11
Cheese Doc Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cambridge, UK. Posts: 4,609	I have to say that I am almost 100% sure that that is fake. I've recently seen some people make huge efforts to fake Sandra scores, POST snapshots and 3dmark screenshots and it is all possible... The score does look v. impressive but I doubt it r. p.s. there are more than a few suspicious things... why is the 3dmark 2001 score so low? Low you say... well yes, a 2.5Ghz P4 with a barely overclocked gf3 can do 10000, a 3.7Ghz proc (ish - I forget) should be able to do 18k+! Anyway I don't think we were supposed tot ake it seriously...

16th Oct 2001, 11:14	#13
Zmaster2k You looking at me? Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Guildford Posts: 388	now waY the ceremic would crack!! it cannot physically go that high __________________ If it aint overclocked it aint fast enough! President of the CLC - Cone Layers Club http://www.hououji.homestead.com/files/kotarou.gif

16th Oct 2001, 19:38	#14
Will Beware the judderman... Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Aberystwyth, boyo. Posts: 3,058	i smell doggy do take a closer look! this guy has a 128Mb gf3 - i think not! is running his bus at 483Mhz DDR - no way! he has dx9 - naaah! he has a custom chipset - whatever! he has a custom motherboard made by abit - um yeah whatever! lol this is even more of a fib than the claimed 933 p3 at 1800 odd i once saw somewhere :cool: __________________ \|\| Email \|\| Some people are like slinkies. No good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down stairs.

17th Oct 2001, 09:19	#16
ChriX ^ Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: North Cornwall, UK Posts: 2,641	it IS also possible to get a 128Mb GeForce3 aswell.

18th Oct 2001, 19:13	#18
six degrees Supermodder Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 441	I WANT ONE I WANT ONE I WANT ONE. Yes, I want a pc like that.

18th Oct 2001, 22:17	#19
Cheese Doc Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Cambridge, UK. Posts: 4,609	DirectX 9 is currently available for ms beta testers and there's a public sign up for it... so there's bound to be lots and lots of copies of it flying around on warez sites and the lark. r.

2nd Nov 2001, 19:11	#20
IamChickenlittl Minimodder Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Boston, Ma. Posts: 34	The physics behind those number just aren't possible. I know Intel has a 3 gig prototype but, I doubt this guys has one...plus theirs is overclocked as well. Anyways I only saw one celeron 300 that doubled it's rate and that guy was pretty good. It is a fake. __________________ "Tell them I said something" -Pancho Villa before hanging