|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dolby buys BrightSide Technologies
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of TEXAS
Posts: 208
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Geoff Richards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
![]() |
Rule #1: don't proof news stories after 11pm Timmy! :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Spoon? What spoon?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 936
![]() |
Definitely filed under smart business strategy.
This will also be a bonus to consumers as Dolby has shown a history of successfully spreading technologies and also of a rapid reduction of prices for said technologies over short periods. |
|
|
|
| Bluephoenix |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Bluephoenix |
|
|
#5 |
|
Geoff Richards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
![]() |
I wonder if it's related to the 3D Cinema stuff Dolby announced AGES ago: http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2006/0...try_id=1531278
BrightSide do have High Dynamic Range projector technology too... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 220
![]() |
Bluephoenix makes me happy. I certainly hope that Dolby successfully gets this tech on the market fast and cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Super Douche
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 229
![]() |
I only thought about this a few days ago and wondered when this technology was going to hit the mainstream. This is a smart move by Dolby and I look forward to seeing what they can achieve with this aquisition. 28 million is a small price to pay for technology with this much potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Ultramodder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SE Wisconsin (us)
Posts: 1,439
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
New Rig, Quad Core and 8800 baby! now my server|Athlon 64 3700(2.64ghz)|7800gs|2gb XMS 2-3-3-6|2tb+ total HD space... In raid|I have a problem. New Laptop: HP EliteBook, its fast! |
|
|
|
|
| speedfreek |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by speedfreek |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: India
Posts: 406
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
It sure took me a long time to realize I hadn't changed my forum settings since returning from Canadia-land. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Constructing since 1978
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,842
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Good on Dolby. All I can say is "bring it on".
__________________
Remember - for every silver lining there is a cloud. "Of course, overclocking doesn't normally involve a tank of acetylene large enough to blow a house off its foundation." - zackbass MAME Over - Custom built arcade cabinet. This season's mod - The New Black Also modded - "Got Milk?" |
|
|
|
|
| Constructacon |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Constructacon |
|
|
#11 |
|
Geoff Richards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
![]() |
There's a Whitepaper on how it works but we haven't seen a demo yet. I believe the results aren't quite as good as the LCD TV (how could it be?) BUT it still promises to be lightyears ahead of current projectors, which are notorious for having rubbish black-level performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Uonuma-Shi, Niigata-ken
Posts: 635
![]() |
All I can say is that I want one.
How long will it take for licensing and production? Will we see these out by the Holiday season? I would gladly exchange a major extremity for a true Hi-Def home theater with 7.1 surround sound and HDR projector. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fife
Posts: 210
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
There is so a spoon |
|
|
|
|
| blackerthanblack |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by blackerthanblack |
|
|
#14 |
|
Officious Bystander
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nodnol
Posts: 1,597
![]() |
Ooooh, can't wait for my 1080p HDR set. Hopefully within 12 months now
__________________
Demand Naked DSL in the UK! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Geoff Richards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
![]() |
I think within 12 months is perfectly reasonable, though at what pricepoint, I daren't guess. 1080p is already a reality, albeit a fairly pricey one. BrightSide's HDR IMLED technology has nothing to do with the LCD panel, so it can not only work with any existing 720p / 1080p panel, but might almost be considered a "drop in" solution.
Of course, there are the mechanics (and economics!) of the backlight itself but with Samsung already demoing what we believe to be the same tech then Time to Market and Pricepoint are really just a question of marketing strategy. They're definitely going to appear at the high end first and then trickle down across the range. Eventually CCFL backlights will be a thing of the past and we might then see static LED backlight models and IMLED models.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Et arma et verba vulnerant
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 2,919
![]() |
Samsung certainly aren't going to release a display the requires water cooling for it's backlight
That certainly can't be helping the release date!I'd like a Samsung monitor with IMLED, WQUXGA, DisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Component, and a high colour gamut.
__________________
[AMD A64 2800+ + Zalman 7700][MSI K8N Neo Platinum][1GB Corsair PC3200][Leadtek Geforce 6600GT][Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 80GB + Maxtor Diamond Max Plus10 200GB + Maxtor Diamond Max16 120GB][Plextor PX-716 DVD-RW + 2x Plextor Premium 52x32x52 CD-RW + 16x Samsung DVD][Coolermaster ATC-201 BXT][Antec TruePower 430][Dell 2405FPW + Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070u][Logitech MX1000][Matias Tactile Pro][Griffin Technology PowerMate Black] Email Me |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Geoff Richards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
![]() |
Quote:
By the time this stuff goes mainstream, it shouldn't be any harder to cool than maybe a regular plasma screen (which often have active aircooling) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Officious Bystander
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nodnol
Posts: 1,597
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Joking aside, white LEDs help broaden the colour gamut, so that is pretty much a given. Why would you want VGA on that next-next-gen monitor? That's like wanting a PC that's compatible with a 9600 baud modem, isn't it? I'd just have a bank of HDMI and DisplayPort connectors, and maybe Component for XBox 360. WQUXGA - had to wikipedia that one. 3840 x 2400! I guess you'll be wanting quad cryogenically cooled Geforce 9900 GTX cards to power it, then. Incidentally, I think you'll need more bandwidth than HDMI or DisplayPort can afford - the highest spec (1.3) only stretches to 10.2Gbps, and DisplayPort offers four 2.7Gbps channels (10.8 Gbps total). At a resolution of 3840 x 2400 x 24 bpp, that only gives you enough for 46fps, not even allowing for audio bandwidth and overheads. Not good. Dual-link HDMI, anyone? Add to that the fact you'll want more colour depth for HDR (say 36 bpp, maybe 48), and you're reducing that fps still further. I'd guess you're also pushing the limits of component and VGA, though I don't really understand analogue video well enough to say for sure.Maybe it will be out in time to play Duke Nukem Forever.
__________________
Demand Naked DSL in the UK! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Officious Bystander
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nodnol
Posts: 1,597
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Demand Naked DSL in the UK! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 220
![]() |
Quote:
I've been wondering the same thing for years. Interestingly, I can remember when there were lots of 1280x720 TV's. Then, suddenly, there were a few 1280x768 TVs -- I assumed that that 16x10 ratio happened to be friendlier for PC inputs, given that "768" and "1280" were already portions of standard computer resolutions (1024x768 and 1280x1024). Then, soon after that, they jumped up to 1366x768 -- I kindof assume that was to get rid of the "black bars" that a 16x10 TV uses to display a 16x9 image, because 1366x768 is back to a 16:9 ratio. Yeah...I've never really had a chance to compare image quality on a "768p" set vs a 720p set, but I can't imagine the scaling is very accurate, given the strange ratio. 720p and 1080i/p scale with a factor of 1.5, which shouldn't be too bad....but the ratio between 768 and 720 is 1.066666, which seems like it's going to show more artifacts. I'm kindof thinking nowadays that perhaps "Average Joe" thinks more pixels is always better....so a 1366x768 set will always sell better than a 1280x720 set sitting next to it. So, manufacturers can't just go back to the format that makes sense without risking sales. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|