RSS



Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 5th Jun 2007, 19:16   #1
Tim S
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
Tim S is a glorious beacon of lightTim S is a glorious beacon of lightTim S is a glorious beacon of lightTim S is a glorious beacon of lightTim S is a glorious beacon of light
Intel's X38 chipset has IHS

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/06...pset_has_ihs/1

COMPUTEX 2007: Intel's upcoming X38 chipset will feature an integrated heatspreader. Pictures inside.

Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 19:20   #2
Mankz
ITS OVER 8000!
 
Mankz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere in Berks Ninja Status: Lv.69
Posts: 8,073
Mankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud ofMankz has much to be proud of
Whats the point! We don't need Chipset heatspreaders!!!

All you need is an HSF on the bare core.
__________________
Sponsored By...: HWLabs SpecialTech Feser 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveVader View Post
Sig'd!

Last edited by Mankz; 5th Jun 2007 at 21:48.
Mankz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 19:53   #3
Sim0n
Ahhh Jimlad
 
Sim0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1,109
Sim0n is on a distinguished road
This aint new, the old AMD SokA SMP boards used to have IHS on them, 790X was it ?

Athlon MP boards.
Sim0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 20:06   #4
ch424
Design Warrior
 
ch424's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,510
ch424 has a spectacular aura aboutch424 has a spectacular aura about
Mankz, In the article there's quite a good explanation for why they decided an IHS was needed. Plus, you're a 15/16 y/o barely doing GCSEs and the people designing this probably have PhDs in electronics/thermal engineering. I'd happily go with their decision...

Your terrible grammar doesn't make you seem intelligent either.
ch424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 20:11   #5
teamtd11
I *am* a Dremel
 
teamtd11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saltburn-By-The-Sea
Posts: 1,645
teamtd11 will become famous soon enoughteamtd11 will become famous soon enough
So remove the IHS, stick a waterblock on and get ready for some monster FSB speeds?
__________________
Main: AMD X2 3ghz, x1900xt, DFI NF590SLI, 4gb pc2-8500 [Watercooled]
Retro: AMD Barton 2ghz, 9600xt, 512mb pc-2700
Animal Crossing: LGTTC - 2492-7863-6464
Member of CK Appreciation Society Group
teamtd11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 20:26   #6
cool_dude
K.
 
cool_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: @ UKay
Posts: 1,764
cool_dude is on a distinguished road
Ooooh... wonder if the IHS is concave on that too? like most C2D's.... :/
__________________
Cheers, Cool_Dude.
...Talk is cheap.
cool_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 20:33   #7
Fiber4now
Don't feed the trolls
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
Fiber4now is on a distinguished road
a little off topic but there seems no new news coming out of Computex since even with the hype of Intel and Nvidia working together under new technology and marketing agreements Nvidia has not given or Intel has not asked for SLI support on any of their new Chipsets. All I have read from your reports from Computex are that Crossfire support is built in. This is kind of funny since AMD now owns ATI and a almost a full yr has gone by after Intel has voided ATI's working agreement with Intel and still the motherboard manufacturers have not forced Nvidia to open SLI support to Intel or have Intel forced into using SLI.

What is going on here? from the latest reports Nvidia enthusiast discrete graphics cards are selling 2 to 1 vs ATI products, leaving Nvidia chipsets with SLI support the #1 choise. This will not change for Intel without SLI since yes you can make one heck of a single card system out of a Intel chipset and a Nvidia G8800 Ultra but what about the Intel C2D CPU with SLI G8800 GTS system that will first sell for less but out perform the Intel C2D Crossfire X2900 XT system. That is the part that I do not understand all new chipsets and motherboards and still Nvidia and Intel are feuding.

Perhaps I have answered my own question what advantage is it for Nvidia to introduce SLI to Intel when they have the market for Dual Discrete Graphics cards all sewn up already.
Fiber4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:28   #8
lamboman
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 969
lamboman is on a distinguished road
If only you could put a CPU cooler on there lol
Imagine a stupid person trying to lap it? They pick up the motherboard and try to that way lol
I think its a good idea, temps will be up a bit, but at least thermal paste will be easier to apply
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 @ 3.04GHz | OCZ Platinum Rev 2 @ 760MHz (4-4-4-12) | Asus P5K-E/WIFI-AP | Asus EAX1950 Pro | Coolermaster CM690
Corsair VX450 | Samsung 932B | Logitech G5/Media Elite/Z-3

Last edited by lamboman; 5th Jun 2007 at 21:39.
lamboman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th Jun 2007, 01:48   #9
Bindibadgi
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
 
Bindibadgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,226
Bindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to beholdBindibadgi is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiber4now
a little off topic but there seems no new news coming out of Computex since even with the hype of Intel and Nvidia working together under new technology and marketing agreements Nvidia has not given or Intel has not asked for SLI support on any of their new Chipsets. All I have read from your reports from Computex are that Crossfire support is built in. This is kind of funny since AMD now owns ATI and a almost a full yr has gone by after Intel has voided ATI's working agreement with Intel and still the motherboard manufacturers have not forced Nvidia to open SLI support to Intel or have Intel forced into using SLI.

What is going on here? from the latest reports Nvidia enthusiast discrete graphics cards are selling 2 to 1 vs ATI products, leaving Nvidia chipsets with SLI support the #1 choise. This will not change for Intel without SLI since yes you can make one heck of a single card system out of a Intel chipset and a Nvidia G8800 Ultra but what about the Intel C2D CPU with SLI G8800 GTS system that will first sell for less but out perform the Intel C2D Crossfire X2900 XT system. That is the part that I do not understand all new chipsets and motherboards and still Nvidia and Intel are feuding.

Perhaps I have answered my own question what advantage is it for Nvidia to introduce SLI to Intel when they have the market for Dual Discrete Graphics cards all sewn up already.
AMD needs Intel's market share, Intel doesn't have multi GPU. Nvidia won't unlock it's SLI since it also has a massive market share on both platforms. If NV release SLI on Intel chipsets it's own marketshare will drop since Intel can price/promote NV out the market.

You can unofficially run anything on anything, if you can find drivers that fit. If the PCI-Express lanes are connected somehow all you have to do is "enable" the point to point connection.

No one is feuding, they're just doing good business.
Bindibadgi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.