|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Preferred Music format? | |||
| Mp3 - compatible with everything! |
|
212 | 56.23% |
| Ogg - compressed, but open source |
|
21 | 5.57% |
| AAC - better compression for the noise |
|
16 | 4.24% |
| FLAC - open source and lossless |
|
53 | 14.06% |
| Other Lossless (eg Apple or Ape) - because you have a ton of space |
|
4 | 1.06% |
| CD - nothing like having physical media! |
|
32 | 8.49% |
| Vinyl - I'm a pure audio demon and my setup is probably worth more than your house! |
|
13 | 3.45% |
| Tape - old school chromium oxide rules. |
|
1 | 0.27% |
| Other compression - because I'm obscure for strange reasons |
|
2 | 0.53% |
| Other physical media - because nothing says unique like still using MDs. |
|
1 | 0.27% |
| WAV - pure and simple |
|
1 | 0.27% |
| WMA - Microsoft did something right for you? |
|
14 | 3.71% |
| AC3 - Dolby surround |
|
0 | 0% |
| DTS - Because you're a DTS fanboy and nothing else will do (Geoff) |
|
5 | 1.33% |
| DVD-A - It's HD/surround, don't you know. |
|
1 | 0.27% |
| SACD - Because it's uhh.. super. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Midi - It's never too old school. |
|
1 | 0.27% |
| Voters: 377. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | View Mode |
|
|
#1 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,226
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Preferred music format?
Given that we're a whole load of audiophiles or just simply music lovers: what format do you keep your music in? Leave it on CD or Vinyl? Compress it beyond comprehension into mp3 but have it compatible with everything or use up plenty of space by keeping it lossless?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 7,620
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Given my current setup CD is the best format I can play. Though if I had a turntable I would choose vinyl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
... Yo Momma
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,240
![]() |
MP3 all the way for me at the moment but only because of the immense compatibility. I would probalbly go for ogg or AC3 otherwise.
__________________
Remember the human and read up on Netiquette. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
bwarp
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 12,981
![]() ![]() ![]() |
MP3 due to the compatibility. It's going to be a long while before stuff doesn't play MP3 anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Serious about coffee
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 7,555
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
all FLAC here, after upgrading both my PC speakers and sound card many average bitrate MP3s became virtually unlistenable in comparison :/
may as well anyway, in the grand scheme of things it really doesn't take up all that much space |
|
|
|
| Mister_Tad |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Mister_Tad |
|
|
#6 |
|
/dev/null
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,102
![]() ![]() |
MP3 for compatibility...
But if there was a "I don't care as long as it plays" option, I'd go for that one. If FLAC would be more mainstream, I'd re-rip everything in FLAC, but for now it's a waste of space (and I'm not a audiophile)
__________________
There Are 10 Types Of People, Those Who Know Binary and Those Who Don't |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
say whoa
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Warwick
Posts: 5,537
![]() |
I voted for CD, since if someone offered me the choice between a physical copy or a download I'm gonna go with the physical one. But really I've only bought like two CDs this year yet I've obtained many many albums. It's terrible, but hey, I have about 700 CDs at my parent's place collecting dust.
I'm not too fussed about all this lossless stuff though. I don't like low bit-rate MP3s but anything 192 and above sounds just fine to me. Even 128's ok sometimes. Beggars can't be choosers and all that.
__________________
15GB 3G iPod - 16GB 3G iPhone
24" iMac - 2.66 GHz - 4GB RAM - 640 GB HDD - 500GB WD MyBook - 40" Samsung M87 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
What owl?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,975
![]() ![]() |
MP3 because i'm lazy. too lazy to recode every thing to ogg or flac.
__________________
No boom today, boom tomorrow... there's always a boom tomorrow. |
|
|
|
| steveo_mcg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by steveo_mcg |
|
|
#9 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,226
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Amen to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Ginger Nut
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Exeter, Devon/Wantage, Oxfordshire
Posts: 5,233
![]() |
FLAC, simply because it sounds the best and is open.
Most of my library is mp3/ogg however since a lot of stuff was found as mp3 and so converting it to ogg or flac without some highyer quality source available would be pointless. I use Ogg because it's small, sounds great and more people can listen than flac.
__________________
Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and Ensign Ricky are beaming down to the planet. Guess who's not coming back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Gettin' Lazy
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winchester, UK
Posts: 757
![]() |
DTS is prefered but I have many formats all over the place althought most of my stuff is mp3. I do have some vinyls lying around but not an impressive player system.
__________________
Last edited by Spacecowboy92; 20th Aug 2007 at 10:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I Mod, Therefore I Own
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere in the south
Posts: 3,454
![]() ![]() |
I use mp3 due to compatibility. Sometimes I rip in AAC though, generally when I forget to change the settings on iTunes and the like.
I won't rip any less than 192k/s and prefer to just go the full whack at 320kbps just "cause I can" kinda thing. I will however buy CD's rather than downloads due to the price. More often than not I can get a proper CD with all the shiny album art for the same price as an iTunes download album and I prefer to be able to hold something for my money when it comes to stuff like movies or music. If downloads were cheaper, say £2 per album then I'd bother.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Scan Computers
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the dancefloor reaching for the laser
Posts: 100
![]() |
Same here with the mp3 for compatability as I stream them to a variety of devices round the house, mainly my 360 or the squeezebox 3 we have.
Plus with an X-Fi soundcard the 3D crystaliser enabled does help improve the quality of most the mp3 files I have at home.
__________________
Women are like a half-eaten box of chocolates. All the good ones have already been taken, leaving the nutty ones behind |
|
|
|
| Lee @ Scan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lee @ Scan |
|
|
#14 |
|
Trust the Computer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,797
![]() |
I rip at a high quality WMA, usually 320kbp/s, as it's the best quality and compression I can use knowing it'll work on whatever MP3 player I finally get round to purchasing (and no, it won't be an iPod).
<A88> |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Resident frenchie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: localhost
Posts: 584
![]() |
mp3, but I also listen to .sc68 Atari/Amiga music files, so it could be Obscure.
What about midi ? not in the poll ? ^^
__________________
I also have a MTBF. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Trust the Computer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,797
![]() |
MIDI isn't really an audio compression standard- you can't (easily) rip music to MIDI, it's more for retaining individual track details for editing and listening to 80s-video-games-style-guitar-riffs.
edit:having read all your post, MIDI seems entirely appropriate ![]() <A88> |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
An Ugly Pineapple!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hellsinki
Posts: 1,808
![]() |
Vinyl for me! Nothing better then that. And DJing is just better then with CD/MP3....
edit: Seems like I am the only one so far
__________________
Laptop: Acer Aspire One, 1.6GHz Atom, 1.5GB Ram, 30GB 1.8" HDD, Windows 7 Gaming Rig: Athlon 64 3000+ s754 @ 2.15GHz, 1,5 GB Ram, 800 GB Hdd, Radeon HD 2900 Pro 512 MB Linux Box: VIA Epia 550mHz, 512mb Ram, 200GB Hdd, Ubuntu Server 7.10 Project ~Sinus~ - Update 27.02.2007 Front Bay done! Mini Project "SuperUser" - Update 10.06.2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Trust the Computer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,797
![]() |
I've got a few vinyls, just nothing to play em on so far! I'm planning on getting a budgets seperates system at some point (around £600-700) which'll have a Pro-ject Debut to get some life out of em. I didn't actually notice the physical options on the list, so would have probably opted for CD; sure, it's not 1/2 as nice-sounding as vinyl, but I find it more practical on the whole, and seem to be buying music in bulk right now.
<A88> |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
^_^
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lincs.
Posts: 1,641
![]() |
MP3 @ =>192kbps
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Don't panic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 15,140
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CD for everything uncompressed, OGG ~192k for compressed music, i.e. comp/i-river.
![]() Can't beat the feeling of having a physical copy - sublime!
__________________
|E8400 @ 4.4GHz|WC: 2*120.1 GT's, MCP350, Storm G5|4GB Dominators|DFI LT X48-T2R|8800GT|74GB Raptor|Chieftec BA01|OCZ ModXStream 600W|Dell 2208WFP|
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, The LOL!!1!!1!, The Zlad!, The Kempness, The Braaaaaains... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
music ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| View Mode | |
|
|