|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nvidia Hybrid SLI follow up
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...eview_part_2/1
After spending most of Friday afternoon talking with several Nvidia representatives about its Hybrid SLI technology, we're back again today to add some more insight into it. We've got more information on display support, the mGPU and some future considerations.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
whatever
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,879
![]() |
could it be that there is only one display supported because sli doesnt support more than one either? just a thought.
anyway, good article on a technology that sure looks promising (even though it needs some refining).
__________________
920 D0, EX58-UD5, 6GB OCZ 1333 @ 1600 7-6-6, 4870x2, 128 GB Samsung PB22-J SSD and 2 old 500GB WD's, Seasonic M12 700W, Cosmos S Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Nvidia is also working on multi-monitors for SLI too (Hybrid SLI will get that from the outset)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 334
![]() |
so still basically for first iteration avoid. I mean don't touch with 50ft bargepole.
I think all this could be done on graphics card and Nvidia as usual have gone for the expensive for customers, easy for them route which means buy new hardware for dubious results. Willing to give it time but even telling people now about what seems a fundamentally broken system seems pointless |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
whatever
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,879
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
920 D0, EX58-UD5, 6GB OCZ 1333 @ 1600 7-6-6, 4870x2, 128 GB Samsung PB22-J SSD and 2 old 500GB WD's, Seasonic M12 700W, Cosmos S Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Yermo, CA, USA
Posts: 174
![]() |
Quote:
But yeah, It needs development still in the 2560x1600 and display port res department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 887
![]() |
Well personally, i'm not at all enthused by this, However, it is early days, and there are many bugs to work out
Also, i note nvidia have been quiet on the XP front - again |
|
|
|
| completemadness |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by completemadness |
|
|
#8 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it's limited to Vista because of the way it handles video memory in scenarios like this. It's definitely not limited to SP1 though - that's one thing I asked.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Minimodder
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 32
![]() |
when they impliment displayport, doesnt that meet multi display will be easier? I thought displayport supported daisy chaining of monitors... or maybe that wa a future project. oh well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yep, that's definitely within DisplayPort's remit, although I would imagine that you'll again be bandwidth limited when it comes to the resolution/number of monitors you can daisy chain.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 148
![]() |
How does daisy chaining the monitors work?
p.m me to keep thread clean
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|