|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Crucial Ballistix Tracer Red PC-6400 4GB kit
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200..._pc-6400_4gb/1
4GB kits are swiftly becoming the choice of gamers and enthusiasts - and since prices have dropped considerably for DDR2, it makes upgrading all that much sweeter. We look at Crucial's new Ballistix Tracer modules, which are now available all in red.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 148
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry, I meant "linked above".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
whatever
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,879
![]() |
having a 2GB kit in the mix to compare performance to the 4GB ones would have been nice... anyway, nice review of a good product, shame that it doesnt oc like the legendary D9GMH / D9GMX ram though.
__________________
920 D0, EX58-UD5, 6GB OCZ 1333 @ 1600 7-6-6, 4870x2, 128 GB Samsung PB22-J SSD and 2 old 500GB WD's, Seasonic M12 700W, Cosmos S Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There's plenty of 2GB memory reviews out there already and we've planned to do a specific "Is more memory better" review in a few weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I'm not a modder.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds/Durham Uni
Posts: 1,844
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
i7 920, 8800GTS 512, 6GB Corsair all in an Intel DX58SO; 3*320GB RAID5; CM Stacker ![]() Samsung Q45. Last edited by Cupboard; 17th Mar 2008 at 13:07. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
What's a Dremel?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portsmouth UK
Posts: 7
![]() |
"4GB on a 32bit"
That would be ok if 32bit OS could use all of it
__________________
Silverstone TJ09, ASUS Maxmius Formula, Intel Duo E8500 (Still to come), 4GB 8500 Crucial Ballistx Tracer, 2x Segate 500gb, 1X Seagate 750gb, Enermax 1000w PSU, 8800GTX |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Apparently I'm Greg Kinnear
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 378
![]() |
How dare ye misspell Corsair! (Check the charts)
__________________
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 125
![]() |
agree with tidy_boy, I had problems with 4gb in winxp 32bit edition
__________________
Give them cake |
|
|
|
| HandMadeAndroid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HandMadeAndroid |
|
|
#10 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nope, 64-bit only. The price difference between 32-bit and 64-bit OEM is nothing these days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 239
![]() |
Yes, but Vista in 64-bit takes up more memory that 32-bit. As do all your apps. In the comparisons I have read it is usually between 15% and 20% more memory usage than 32-bit. So having a 32-bit configuration for the test might be a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
I'm not a modder.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds/Durham Uni
Posts: 1,844
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Not to worry though.
__________________
i7 920, 8800GTS 512, 6GB Corsair all in an Intel DX58SO; 3*320GB RAID5; CM Stacker ![]() Samsung Q45. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Master of the Universe
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London, England.
Posts: 28
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 136
![]() |
Well overclockers.co.uk are stocking the crucial ram reviewed here, on this week only for just £84.59 (inc. Vat)
__________________
SNIPERMikeUK
|
|
|
|
| SNIPERMikeUK |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SNIPERMikeUK |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...d=8&subcat=813 Bargain! Zargon - it's planned as: 2x1GB, 4x1GB, 2x2GB, 4x2GB. That's a lot of hours testing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 92
![]() |
Just for an unscientific/interest point, I felt that putting another 2gb in my vista 64 system did give it an perceptible extra oomph...
And given that the OS now idles on 1.8gb used...that would make sense. I assume that a fair chunk of that is superfetch, although it is still slightly incredible! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 92
![]() |
---addendum for Zargon
I have never yet managed to use the full 4gb, or even get within 200/300mb of it, regardless of how heavily I am multitasking - I just cannot imagine 8gb giving any further use. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 64-bit version of Vista is designed to use memory more dynamically, so if you have 8GB of memory it'll simply throw more into it to take even less weight off the need to access the hard drive and pagefile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
...
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 323
![]() |
Hate to jump on the request bandwagon, but if you have a bit of extra time can you run Vista vs Vista SP1. Just a normal 4GB bench (startup-idle and stressed) should be enough.
Forget about it. I could do that here. Suspect M$ did something to the fundamental way Vista works with RAM given that they got a wacky branding case in the court and the slight delay in SP1 by a month or so. ![]() I think Vista SP1 should be out in a week or 2 to some. In April or May for most. Vista SP1 out tomorrow. Not in a week. It's has a lot to do with the way software is coded. Last edited by ryanjleng; 17th Mar 2008 at 23:33. Reason: Sit ubu sit. Good dog. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Article Addendum: We got in contact with CrucialPR that corrected us that the memory chips used are in fact Micron, not Prochip. We have corrected this technicality accordingly
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|