|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Player Character
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,940
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dates for 45nm AMD CPUs and RV710, RV730
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/08...-rv710-rv730/1
AMD's mainstream/low end products will be available in September and its 45nm CPU products will be here in Q4 this year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 258
![]() ![]() |
The graphics market has certainly become more competitive in the last 6 months, it would be nice to see AMD make up ground in the CPU market too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
International Man of Awesome
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: County Durham, UK
Posts: 961
![]() |
I just got my 4850 this weekend.. I'll be testing it soon. Tonight, hopefully. My mate is giving me his copy of Crysis too.. I reckon it'll run well.
__________________
Q6600 @ 2.40GHz w/G0|Gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R|4GB OCZ Gold PC-6400 800MHz|Powercolor Radeon HD4850|Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB|Scythe Ninja Mini|LG Blu-ray/HD DVD/DVD-RW Combo Drive|Corsair TX650W|Antec NSK2480
Pioneer VSX-417|2x Gale 3010|2x Yamaha NSP110| MS304W Centre | MS308 Subwoofer |
|
|
|
| Timmy_the_tortoise |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Timmy_the_tortoise |
|
|
#4 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 872
![]() ![]() |
read abit on a quad 45nm phenom, it beat out same clock quad intel so I can't wait for them to hit the market to spice things up. hopefully force intel to introduce nehalem mid and low end cpu's alot sooner then they had planned...but i doubt the 45nm phenom will beat nehalem as I have high hopes for intels new bus and onboard mem controller......would be sweet if they did as i'd love an all ati/amd spider platform but until phenom outperforms similiar clock q9350 and have better overclocking thats a dream
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
LandsElite.com
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the sticks, UK
Posts: 313
![]() |
Any links to where you read that Denis, I'm very interested in seeing it beat a similar clocked Core 2 Quad.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Jack_Pepsi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jack_Pepsi |
|
|
#6 |
|
hardware freak
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 121
![]() |
Speculation iz da debil
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dacula, GA USA
Posts: 302
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
a.k.a KazeModz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cali, USA
Posts: 1,785
![]() |
Well I am certainly looking forward to the 45nm phenoms and how they will OC, I really do hope that AMD can come at level or overtake Intel as that will help the market again.
__________________
Current Rig: RubyRED
• Lian-Li A05B • (2) Swiftech 220 Radiators • (2) D5 Variable Pumps • (2) Res • and a whole lot of modding • Retired Rig: Project F.E.A.R. • TT Lanbox Lite • Swiftech H2O-120 • Q6600 G0 OC@3.6ghz • 2900XT • 4gb SuperTalent Memory • |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pie Eater
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pyrford, England
Posts: 361
![]() |
ok, with reference to the more is better idea that the public has on graphics card memory, why isnt more better as i'd have thought that it would be? someone please give a fairly detailed answer rather than just calling me a noob,
oh, and nice to amd giving it large....hoorah! peace fatman
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3600Mhz ¦ Asus Maximus II Formula ¦ ATI Radeon 4890 (1000Mhz Core + 1200Mhz Mem OC) ¦ 2x2G Corsair Dom. PC 8500 @ 1080Mhz ¦ Aquacomputer WC ¦ Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty ¦ 150G Raptor, 2x1500 + 1x750 + 2x500 Seagate (SATA2) ¦ Pioneer DVD burner ¦ Lian Li - PC 73SL Aluminium Silent Server Case ¦ Dell 2007WFP 20" Widescreen ¦ Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers ¦ Sennheiser HD270
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 833
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
1: budget cards are using lots of cheap slow memory. in most cases a smaller amount of fast memory is better than bucketloads of slow memory, the budget GPU just won't be quick enough to get any benefit from the extra memory. however, it looks great to bung a huge memory amount in big letters on the packaging, hence why this happens anyway. 2: budget GPU + fast memory = respectable budget GPU + slow memory = slow, but cheaper To sum it up: crippling the cards to give bigger numbers on the packaging/tech stats to get the more clueless users who (understandably) assume higher numbers = better product
__________________
AMD Phenom x3 720 @ 3.4Ghz | Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H | 4GB DDR3 | ATI 4890 1GB| 1TB Samsung F1 | 64GB Corsair P64 SSD |
|
|
|
|
| cyrilthefish |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by cyrilthefish |
|
|
#11 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jinan, China
Posts: 417
![]() |
well, look at le differa'nce between 65nm and 90nm AMD cpu's and there ain't much, 45nm with out change in the architecture should lead to higher clock speeds and prudent effencientcy. What AMD should do sell low... very low with as great as hz as they can pump out.
Either that or unlock those darned multipliers....
__________________
Peace, Love, Empathy, Respect, Generosity, Smiles, and Hugs |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm not a modder.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds/Durham Uni
Posts: 1,840
![]() ![]() |
also low end cards usually have low memory bandwidths so they cannot effectively talk to lots of memory. That is why there is little point for a G92 based card (8800GT, 8800GTS, 9800GT, 9800GTX) with a 256bit memory bandwidth having more than 512MB memory.
edit: using GDDR5/higher memory clocks do help here obviously...
__________________
i7 920, 8800GTS 512, 6GB Corsair all in an Intel DX58SO; 3*320GB RAID5; CM Stacker ![]() Samsung Q45. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|