|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Player Character
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,011
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Winter 2008 Graphics Performance Update
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...mance-update/1
With new and improved drivers from AMD and Nvidia and a whole batch of new graphically intensive games to test with, we've retested seven high end graphics cards to see how they perform in Far Cry 2, Fallout 3 and more! How does your card perform? Read on to find out!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
regular bit-tech reader
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brnicko, CZ
Posts: 221
![]() |
Great job! Definitely good idea to retest GPU's with new drivers.
So many reviews in november...did you forget to sleep?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 227
![]() |
Quote:
) nice one Bit-Tech!
__________________
Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE ¦ AMD Athlon64 6000 ¦ Gainward GS 4870 1GB ¦ 2x2GB OCZ DDR2-800 Reaper ¦ Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB ¦ Auzentech XFI-Prelude + Creative T7700 7.1¦ Enermax Liberty 500W ¦ CM690 case ¦ Samsung 22" 226CW ¦ Vista x64 SP1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 249
![]() |
Why do you test on different platforms when there's no SLI/Crossfire involved?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Whooolapoook
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stalking Orco
Posts: 1,117
![]() |
I'm likewise thankfull for your recommendation recently for the 1GB 4870 which I've had for about 1 month.
Excellant card, only problem I had so far was Crysis at 1600x1200 and high settings with lots of AA & AF on the last mission. Overclocked my CPU to 3.5Ghz and it went away. Buying another soon for CF.
__________________
0ptimizm :PC under review
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The cake is a lie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,214
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Blah, makes me just wonder why I bought a 4870 512MB... The 1GB version is so much better for so little money...
(I think that was because the 1GB version wasn't out yet when I bought )
__________________
Q9550 @ stock || Asus P5Q Pro || 4x 2GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz CL4 || Radeon 4870 512MB || Asus Xonar DX || 2x WD 640GB || Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme || Corsair HX620 || Antec P182 || Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Benchmarketeer
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ruislip
Posts: 589
![]() |
Quote:
However, we've aware of the slight loop it can throw in our results, which is something we'll be sorting when we build our new GFX test systems in the next few months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ultramodder
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,220
![]() |
Ati:
The cheapest Radeon 4870 1GB I could find is a Club3D for 235,- euro The cheapst Radeon 4870x2 I could find is a Club3D HD 4870 X2 2048MB for 434,- euro Nvidia: The cheapest GTX260 I could find is a Point Of View GTX260 for 245,- euro The cheapest GTX280 1GB I could find is a Asus ENGTX280 for 375,- euro So if you want the best bang for the bucks you just cant go wrong with a 4870 1GB Edit: Forgot to say: thanks for the nice shootout review, very helpful around these days. I would love to see the same for a motherboard, memory or processor! If you guys can find the time
__________________
Mascleta: "The most accurate simulation of thunder, humans can simulate..." The answer is 42, so... whats the question again? If you know what 'Peek' and 'Poke' represents, then you are probably as old as me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Varde; Denmark
Posts: 106
![]() |
nice review allways good to see some competition on the marked.
is it possible that we could see some crossfire tests at some point? currently using a 4850 512MB, and it would be nice to see how two of these looks in comparison with the competition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 263
![]() |
Good to see Nvidia closing the gap. If nvidia gets back on their feet their should be some very nice competition for DX11 cards next year. = Low priced DX11 cards hopefully
__________________
[i5 750]~[MSI GD65]~[Corsair Dominator 4gb]~[GTX 260]~[Samsung F3 1tb]~[Corsair 750w TX]~[LG DVD-RW]~[Coolermaster Stacker 832]
[Acer 24" V249H] [Razer Copperhead]~[Razer Exacmat]~[Saitek Cyborg]~[Creative Fatality] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
▲Operational Hazard Sticker▲
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenbay, WI
Posts: 939
![]() ![]() |
I think my next card will be a radeon....
4870 1gb to be exact. Thanks bit-tech for the unbiased reviews.
__________________
40D| 350D | 24-105 f/4L | 24-70 f/2.8 Sigma | 50mm f/1.8 | 75-300 f/4-5.6 Sigma | 420ex Speedlight
365 Daily Photograph | Smugmug |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm not a modder.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds/Durham Uni
Posts: 1,848
![]() ![]() |
I am surprised the new driver make that large a difference.
I might have to try them for me 8800GTS which is, after all, pretty much the same as a 9800GTX+
__________________
i7 920, 8800GTS 512, 6GB Corsair all in an Intel DX58SO; 3*320GB RAID5; CM Stacker ![]() Samsung Q45. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 209
![]() |
Nice article, as usual
![]() Would be good to see some dedicated crossfire/sli benchmarks across the various cards, i'm particularly interested how 2 4850's stack up against a 4850X2, as the price of this card (ÂŁ300) seems to be a tad out of sorts with the rest of the lineup.
__________________
Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2ghz | Asus Crosshair III Formula | Coolermaster V8 CPU Cooler |4Gb Corsair Dominator DDR3 at 1333mhz | Sapphire Radeon 5870 | Crucial M225 128Gb SSD | Samsung SyncMaster 226BW |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Presenting: LUMINA
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
![]() |
When some sites say that a GTX 280 is faster than a 4870 1GB is a BIG mistake, mainly because in the most of cases are considering games using NVIDIA’s platform. If it was considered more games using ATI’s platform, such as Assassin’s Creed, GRID, Devil May Cry 4, Rainbow Six Vegas, etc, the advantage of ATI would be clear and bigger.
The funny is that when some sites complain about the poor performance of some VGA’s brand and don’t use appropriate games (or unfair mix of games), they are making a huge injustice. The fault for the poor performance is entirely of the complaining tester, in the most of cases. ![]() IMHO, my vote goes to 4870 1GB instead of GTX 280, by far. It has a much better performance in ATI’s platform games and some of NVIDIA's, is more modern and cheaper. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Minimodder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 27
![]() |
I have a 4870(512) and no regrets. I do have one comment, and wondered whether anyone had made the test. The 4870(512) OCs very easily, especially the memory. I really haven't run into anyone who wasn't able to achieve a very stable OC of say 800/1100 (4400 effective). Don't kid yourself, the memory makes a genuine difference in performance, especially here, with +800MHz effective.
On the other hand, i have consistently read that due to being double-density, OCing the memory of the 1GB models beyond 15-25MHz (60-100MHz effective) is nearly impossible without artifacting in 3DMark06, and very risky. So the question is: on regular OCs (no 100% fan speeds, or watercooling) of 800/1100 on a 512MB, and 800/900 (or 925), on a 1GB model, how do they compare? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Madeira's banana is the best!!!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madeira ; Portugal
Posts: 6,485
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i would love to see something like this:
![]() this was taken from crisis at 1,680 x 1,050 4xAA 8xAF, DirectX 10, Very High Quality edit: the king of performance/price is the 4850... the prices were averages from bit-tech shopping.
__________________
RENEGADE X CONTEST! <---- CLICK if you want to win a free Command & Conquer 4 beta key! Last edited by DXR_13KE; 10th Nov 2008 at 21:24. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
quad fuelled, GTX200 powered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in a room near Soton Uni. UK
Posts: 3,943
![]() ![]() ![]() |
there are more to pure gaming performance for graphics cards....... for more feature rich and top end performance at relatively low price it has to be the gtx260+.
the 4870 1GB is good, but it is slower with gtx260+ in games that matters (eg. Crysis), for all other games, there is little point to upgrade at all, if already got a 8800 or equivalent.
__________________
of Corsair Dominators @ 1528Mhz 8-8-8-24 // BFG gtx260+ OC2 MaxCore 216SP 896MB // Samsung 64GB SSD // WD Raptor 74GB + Black 1TB + Green 1TB // Corsair Hx620w // Antec p182 // Samsung 24" T240 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Minimodder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 27
![]() |
Crysis is a nice benchmark, but as a game.... Once finished I certainly felt no urge to go back to it. Fallout 3 for example is a far better game with much more reply value IMHO. So unless the only game you plan to play is Crysis, a more balanced look at the card's performance is preferable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 208
![]() |
i brought a gtx280 and never regretted it. Never been a crossfire fan. Due to lack of driver support. Will always take a single card solution over crossfire or sli.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Possibly Australian
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 36
![]() |
i'd like to see how much of a difference the is between the 512mb and 1gb versions of the 4850, as we see a noticeable difference with the 4870's, but dont see the 1gb 4850 in any bit-tech reviews
__________________
Specs: C2D E6400 @ 3.4ghz, 4x1gb CorsairXMS2C4 @ 850mhz, Gigabyte EP45-DS3L, Asus 4850 1gb o\c'd, 1x 500gb Seagate, 1 x 320gb WD, Antec 650w True Power |
|
|
|
| The_EXorcist |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The_EXorcist |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|