|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nvidia pressures Intel with Ion
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2009/01...tel-with-ion/1
CES 2009: Drew Henry, Nvidia's General Manager of MCP products, has said that Intel will allow partners to build netbooks based on Nvidia's Ion platform.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
CK is God!!!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,066
![]() |
heres hoping to ion being availible on its own (for system builders)
__________________
Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7 Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7 Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7 server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 249
![]() |
Oh yeah, 16 execution pipes in the 9400M.. That's gonna 'harness' a lot of CUDA applications alright!
http://techreport.com/articles.x/15940 Tech Report found in their testing that the Atom bottlenecks even a 9300M dedicated card. This is pointless! The Poulsbo chipset is great for HD media, and that's what the Atom needs. Not this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dacula, GA USA
Posts: 302
![]() |
Shouldn't the tag-line be "wants to ionize the atom"? =P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
MMO Cold Turkey -fail
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 39
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
What owl?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,979
![]() ![]() |
Cost. They're worried they would be uncompetitive with intel and they are correct given they have paid the same as any one else for their atom platform then they need to add more bits to it. The product wouldn't just command a premium it would be expensive. Now while you and I might see the advantages and spend the money for the better unit, you and I are not were the money is, they need to sell these competitively to oem/system builders.
__________________
No boom today, boom tomorrow... there's always a boom tomorrow. |
|
|
|
| steveo_mcg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by steveo_mcg |
|
|
#7 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 203
![]() |
I still wonder what Intel is doing with so many outdated chipsets in stock. Haven't they used them up already back when they were used in laptops? (rhetorical question) Is Intel always overmanufacturing chipset parts?
I know Intel doesn't want to lose profit on pairing up Atom with NVIDIA but this deal is just silly. Please give the customers what they want. Anything else would be horrendously stupid.
__________________
- I'm the troll who bumps page 2 topics - Last edited by Saivert; 12th Jan 2009 at 23:02. Reason: more to the point |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ultramodder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: York, England
Posts: 1,347
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It'd still be a LOT better a computer if Intel let them use dual core Atom chips... that, in the EeeBox would be brilliant
__________________
{Q6600}-{HD4850 512Mb}-{Hiper M 630W}-{Samsung F1 640Gb}-{Antec 300}-{4Gb Team Elite PC6400}-{ECS P35T-A}
{Nikon D80 w/ 18-55 and 50mm f/1.8}-{Lomo Smena 8m} {LandRover G4 Challenge}-{MonsterRoller No Animal} |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ultramodder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: York, England
Posts: 1,347
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry, firefox crashed, restarted, re-posted, delete appreciated?
__________________
{Q6600}-{HD4850 512Mb}-{Hiper M 630W}-{Samsung F1 640Gb}-{Antec 300}-{4Gb Team Elite PC6400}-{ECS P35T-A}
{Nikon D80 w/ 18-55 and 50mm f/1.8}-{Lomo Smena 8m} {LandRover G4 Challenge}-{MonsterRoller No Animal} Last edited by bigsharn; 12th Jan 2009 at 23:29. Reason: stupid computer... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|