bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14th Oct 2009, 09:44   #1
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
HIS ATI Radeon HD 5850 Review

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/gra...-5850-review/1

Looking for a DirectX11 GPU but don't want to drop 300 on an HD 5870? Then meet the HD 5850, the new GPU from ATI looking to dominate the popular 200 price point. We strap it into the bit-tech test system and find out how it measures up with the competition.

__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 09:56   #2
yakyb
i hate the person above me
 
yakyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,056
yakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysisyakyb can run Crysis
Little expensive to be tempting at the moment but would love to own this card
__________________
Mumblings of a prospective indie Game Developer Blog
My Games Website
yakyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 09:59   #3
Kyocera
The Garden of Evil
 
Kyocera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 597
Kyocera has yet to learn the way of the DremelKyocera has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Well, if this would be a previous generation card I would say that it's the best (in its range).

Considering that it performs few framerates better than a Nvidia GTX 260 that is available for 130 GBP, I can only say that this card is a rip off at 200GBP and a "new generation" joke.
Two GTX 206 for the same amount as one 5850 are a torpedo; not mentioning how old as a technical concept they are.

Conclusion? ATi is apparently learning from AMD.

A 5870x2 with a normal price is the only thing to look forward, if I leave out the prays for the GT300.
Kyocera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 10:06   #4
Bauul
Sir Bongaminge
 
Bauul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Godalming, near Guildford
Posts: 2,173
Bauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run Crysis
That's the problem with most "new generation" hardware, it's only really worth it if you didn't upgrade last generation. I picked up a 4770 for £75, and in all honesty I can't imagine I'll find a game I can't play on my 1440x900 with most of the settings on high for a good few years.

It's worth it if you have a 7900, but if you're sporting a 4850, it's just not worth the investment.
__________________
Intel Core i5-2500K | 8Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1,600 Mhz
Gigabyte Geforce 460 GTX OC 1Gb | 1Tb + 1.5Tb Samsung Spinpoint F3 | Asrock Z68 Extreme4
Ibanez RG 470 Japanese Edition | 1991 Japanese Lo-TRS Tremolo | V7 S1 Custom V8 HSH Pickups
Bauul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 10:15   #5
Jipa
Avoiding the "I guess.." since 2004
 
Jipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 6,285
Jipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run CrysisJipa can run Crysis
Wait a month or two, prices will drop and most likely there will be a new driver. No need to cut your arms just because new hardware is more expensive than the old stuff....
__________________
Half a dozen operational setups and truckloads of spare parts.
AllTheMods - MetkuMods - LedCalc - Flickr - BF:BC2
Jipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 10:20   #6
Kyocera
The Garden of Evil
 
Kyocera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 597
Kyocera has yet to learn the way of the DremelKyocera has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I bought a Nvidia 260 ONLY as a bridge; expecting the new cards.
My monitor is the HPLp2475w and it needs a little more power.

The only thing I can do with todays ATI's new DX11 cards is to clean my freezer with them; however my freezer has the self cleaning option, so even this does not come as an option (if I don't consider the price of such handywork).

The news just got out that Nvidia is planning to release the mainstream cards of the new Fermi architecture in March next year (if all goes well).
Nvidia is now focusing on the release of the performance parts as a single GT300 and dual "395" version; single should come out as a 230w part.
It seems that the next 5 months won't be very nice to our wallets/purses.
Kyocera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 10:33   #7
dec
[blank space]
 
dec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 300
dec has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyocera View Post
It seems that the next 5 months won't be very nice to our wallets/purses.
Not necessarily. I bet around december the first price cuts will be coming out for these cards. Possibly as low as $200 for a 5850. I just really hope that nvidia has something big up their sleeve with fermi that can drive prices lower
dec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 11:47   #8
azrael-
I'm special...
 
azrael-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 3,805
azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!azrael- - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
I wonder how the noise level of the HD5850 is. It's quite a bit hotter than the HD5870 in some respects. I'm hoping that part of the reason is a slower-moving and thus quieter cooler.
__________________
It's not the end of the world ...but you can see it from here.

Xeon E3-1245 v2 3.4 GHz | ASUS P8C WS | 16GB Kingston ECC DDR3 | Samsung 830 256GB | eVGA GTX670 2GB | SB Audigy | Seasonic X-560 | Corsair Obsidian 550D | Dell 2209WA
azrael- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 11:53   #9
tad2008
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 310
tad2008 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by azrael-
I wonder how the noise level of the HD5850 is. It's quite a bit hotter than the HD5870 in some respects. I'm hoping that part of the reason is a slower-moving and thus quieter cooler.
+1

Indeed, it would be nice to have the noise / sound level of the GPU's included as part of the review as this does affect my own personal buying decision.
tad2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 11:56   #10
Slepnyrl
Minimodder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 21
Slepnyrl has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Hmm... my 9800GTX died two weeks ago and I don't know what to upgrade with ... I was hoping the HD5850 but
I can get a HD4890 for 140...or the HD5850 for 240... For 100 difference, a bit more Grafphical power, less power requirements, less temp, a quieter fan and DX11...Is it really worth it?
Slepnyrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:08   #11
McVittees
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11
McVittees has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Reading these posts and this review the interesting thing is perspective. My 2.75 year old gtx8800 died two weeks ago and last night I installed my new HD5850 replacement. At £200 I'm getting a ~200% performance increase, a more compact card that runs cooler, uses less power (an important issue with my 520w PSU), is quieter AND costs less than the card it replaced! So, from my perspective this represents an excellent purchase.

I think the DX11 aspect is a bit irrelevant as I bet just like with DX10, it will add overhead that doesn't do much and slows things down. Developers always go for features - not speed (imo).
McVittees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:12   #12
Grimloon
Usually bugnuts
 
Grimloon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Licolnshire, UK
Posts: 781
Grimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run CrysisGrimloon can run Crysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by tad2008 View Post
+1

Indeed, it would be nice to have the noise / sound level of the GPU's included as part of the review as this does affect my own personal buying decision.
What he said. I don't mind a certain amount of noise but could do without a small turbine in my PC.

Any ideas on what triple screen performance is like yet? This is one of the main things that interests me about both this and the 5870 but I'd be interested to see how much of a hammering the frame rate takes from running at 5,040 x 1,050. Do the drivers currently support the Eyefinity features or is this still in the works?
Grimloon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:19   #13
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
As we've said many times over - it's impossible to accurately record noise levels without sending every product off to a proper sound chamber. We are not happy to publish figures that are scientifically innaccurate without a consistent background noise - our labs are a very busy place, so we prefer to just talk about noise subjectively when things quieten down in there, noting any specific problems in the process. The 5850 is no different to the 5870 in terms of noise from our perspective. Fan pitch stays consistent and it's not loud.

We could, of course, send every product we get to the sound chamber we used for our fan labs, but it adds a significant overhead to a regular review and the result would be delayed reviews. There's very little extra benefit in our opinion - it's not something that can be done in time for most product launches and, frankly, is it worth delaying a review by several days (or up to a week) just to get an accurate noise measurement and add a couple of extra graphs into the review? We don't think it is when everything is considered.

Please don't confuse that with what we'd like to do - of course, we'd love to add scientifically accurate noise performance into all of our reviews, but it's just not realistic without product lead times (ahead of launches) being extended by at least a week (ideally giving us two or three weeks to get everything done). That's unlikely to happen with graphics cards in particular, because the driver team likes to work until the last possible minute to ensure the drivers are as good as possible for the launch reviews.

For example, we had 5870 hardware a week before the drivers arrived and we had less than a week to get all of our 5870 testing done ahead of the launch. Everything, including the testing for the architecture piece was done in that week (the architecture piece was delayed because I spent the few days in the US before IDF in bed with fever - the time I'd set aside to get everything about the 5870 written up). That's pretty damn tight for a brand new architecture as it is because there's generally quite a bit to be explored ahead of a major architecture launch.
__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:25   #14
Er-El
Supermodder
 
Er-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, UK
Posts: 482
Er-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the DremelEr-El has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Why is the power consumption on idle slightly higher than the HD5870's ?
OT question: wasn't Direct3D 11 also supposed to run on current D3D10 cards?
Er-El is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:29   #15
Tim S
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Tim S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,878
Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.Tim S is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Er-El View Post
Why is the power consumption on idle slightly higher than the HD5870's ?
card-to-card differences... not all silicon is the same.
Quote:
OT question: wasn't Direct3D 11 also supposed to run on current D3D10 cards?
Parts of DX11 runs on DX10/10.1 hardware, but a lot of it won't.
__________________
My words don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Tim S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 13:54   #16
Elton
Proud Model M User
 
Elton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 8,465
Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.Elton is definitely a rep cheat.
So any whiff of news on those GT300s?
__________________
There's good ideas and then there's terribly great ideas.
Elton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 14:06   #17
Slepnyrl
Minimodder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 21
Slepnyrl has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by McVittees
Reading these posts and this review the interesting thing is perspective. My 2.75 year old gtx8800 died two weeks ago and last night I installed my new HD5850 replacement. At 200 I'm getting a ~200% performance increase, a more compact card that runs cooler, uses less power (an important issue with my 520w PSU), is quieter AND costs less than the card it replaced! So, from my perspective this represents an excellent purchase.

I think the DX11 aspect is a bit irrelevant as I bet just like with DX10, it will add overhead that doesn't do much and slows things down. Developers always go for features - not speed (imo).
Thanks! This is exactly the answer I was looking for!

Regarding the noise testing, I personally don't need accurate decibel measures but simple comparisons to other cards and/or if the noise is a problem at full load. Which is a point that is made on almost every HD4890 review for instance
Slepnyrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 14:24   #18
McVittees
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11
McVittees has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slepnyrl View Post
Thanks! This is exactly the answer I was looking for!
Run the Crysis benchmark and be happy.
McVittees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 14:35   #19
javaman
May irritate Eyes
 
javaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 2,528
javaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for presidentjavaman should be considered for president
Nice starting price but I think ill miss this round till more DX11 flood the market. My GFX card is still under 1year old and can manage everything well. Quick question, whats causing the results to even out at the top? is it the card has reached its limit or CPU bottlenecking?
javaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Oct 2009, 15:05   #20
Bongoman
whos that bongo noob?
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sarf London/Sunny Surrey u decide!
Posts: 2
Bongoman has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Good review... Im building myself a new comp at the end of the month and i think this is the card im gonna buy. It just about represents best bangperbuck in a current market thats being milked by a dominant ati. Damn nvidea for providing no real competition. I cant justify £300 for the 5870.... I can see the 5850s price dropping to around £170 at some point next year so i wouldnt buy it now if i could wait...but i cant wait :/
Still not 100% sure though...gah! choosing the best value/future proof-ish graphics card atm is hard even with all the great guides on this site.
The earlier recommended route of buying a 4890 for £70 less and waiting for dust to settle/300 series is tempting but i dont see nvidea putting up much of a fight in the price to performance stakes.
Bongoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:21.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.