bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 17th May 2010, 11:23   #1
CardJoe
Freelance Journalist
bit-tech Staff
 
CardJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,339
CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.CardJoe is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Google admits Street View WiFi sniffing

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20...ifi-sniffing/1
__________________
----------------

I was Bit-tech's Games Editor. Now I'm freelance. Find me at:

www.joemartinwords.com

@joethreepwood on Twitter
CardJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 11:51   #2
scawp
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 91
scawp has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
google one step closer to skynet everyday. sack of c*nts.
scawp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 12:06   #3
Aracos
Elite
 
Aracos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 1,337
Aracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run CrysisAracos can run Crysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by scawp
google one step closer to skynet everyday. sack of c*nts.
Dammit! I wanted to be the one to say that
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubisoft CEO
Our clear goal today is to come more regularly with our top brands
Ragnarok: i5 750 @ 3200MHz | Titan Fenrir | MSI P55-GD65 | 8GiB Vengence 1600MHz CAS 9 | 1GiB 6950 DirectCU II | 60GB Crucial M4 | Samsung F3 500GB | Samsung F3 1TB | Seasonic X-750 | X-Fi XtremeGamer | HAF932 | Win 7 Pro | openSUSE
Aracos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 12:16   #4
mclean007
Officious Bystander
 
mclean007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nodnol
Posts: 2,009
mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.mclean007 is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Surely more to the point is that if you're running an unsecured WiFi network you should assume that someone is listening to every packet transmitted. In this case it was Google, they only got fragments, and they've pledged to purge it all, so no harm done. Google hasn't published anything they snooped, and it's not like they were actively trying to break into networks - they were just trundling down public roads recording data transmitted in the clear. They weren't using specialist equipment for this either - it could equally well have been someone with sinister intentions using any old laptop with freely available WiFi packet sniffing software.

I say kudos to Google for owning up and taking immediate action. If anything hopefully this will serve to highlight the fact that running an unsecured WiFi network is stoopid, and more people will take basic steps to secure theirs.
__________________
mclean007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 12:19   #5
Lee @ Scan
Scan Computers
 
Lee @ Scan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the dancefloor reaching for the laser
Posts: 128
Lee @ Scan has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by mclean007 View Post
I say kudos to Google for owning up and taking immediate action.
Google didn't own up to it though. This was only found out after the Germans asked to the look at the data the streetcars collected.

If the Germans never asked for access, do you think they would have seriously owned up to it?
__________________
Women are like a half-eaten box of chocolates. All the good ones have already been taken, leaving the nutty ones behind
Lee @ Scan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 12:19   #6
rickysio
N900 | HJE900
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 964
rickysio has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Like Google doesn't know enough of us already. Wifi won't matter.
rickysio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 13:42   #7
Fizzl
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 76
Fizzl has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickysio
Like Google doesn't know enough of us already. Wifi won't matter.
You have missed the point, in some countries (UK included) citizens have been fined or even sent to gaol for wardriving (usually as 'unauthorized access of a computer network') but Google seem to think it's OK to break the law and when they are found out they say Woops our bad! and nothing happens.

I was surprised to find these days I like Microsoft and think Google are pure evil. Ballmer and his mates have created an industry for me to work in that pays extremely well plus developed two gaming platforms I enjoy (PC and xbox). All Google ever seems to do these days is take the piss and sell my data.
Fizzl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 14:12   #8
FelixTech
Robot
 
FelixTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 346
FelixTech has yet to learn the way of the DremelFelixTech has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I'd still take Google over Facebook though...
__________________
Use ClickMechanic for car repairs and servicing!
Play Animal Shogi for free on Android!
FelixTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 16:27   #9
Zurechial
Elitist
 
Zurechial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,038
Zurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run CrysisZurechial can run Crysis
So people are getting up on their high horses about sniffing of unencrypted wifi networks?
lolwut?

If you give a ****, your network will have basic encryption switched on. If people are stupid enough to leave their networks unencrypted in urban areas then google sniffing packets from them are the least of what could happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by article
vast quantities of private WiFi traffic
If the traffic is private, encrypt the network - Simple as that.
__________________
Main: CM Cosmos II <-> i7 4770k <-> EVGA GTX 780Ti SC <-> Sabertooth Z87 <-> 16GB DDR3 <-> Samsung 840 Pro <-> Crucial M4 <-> Dell U2410 <-> HP ZR24w
Laptop: Core i7 2670QM<-> GTX 570M <-> 8GB DDR3 <-> Crucial M4 <-> XMG P511
Zurechial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2010, 20:23   #10
Psytek
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 159
Psytek has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
If you write your credit card details in 10ft high letters on a wall on a main high street with spraypaint... you should expect someone to find that information...

The law needs to be changed to reflect that if you make your wi-fi traffic public, you do so at your own risk.
Technically, anyone with a laptop with wi-fi is currently breaking the law, because any wi-fi radio in any laptop is always 'receiving' the signals of any wi-fi hotspots in range. I agree it's suspicious that google would record payload data, but it sounds like it wasn't a policy decision, it sounds like it was just something the software can do and they overlooked disabling it.
Psytek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2010, 01:36   #11
dark_avenger
Raspberry Pi owner
 
dark_avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,070
dark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysisdark_avenger can run Crysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zurechial View Post
So people are getting up on their high horses about sniffing of unencrypted wifi networks?
lolwut?

If you give a ****, your network will have basic encryption switched on. If people are stupid enough to leave their networks unencrypted in urban areas then google sniffing packets from them are the least of what could happen.


If the traffic is private, encrypt the network - Simple as that.
+1

takes all of 30 seconds and a handful of button presses.
dark_avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2010, 11:15   #12
Lee @ Scan
Scan Computers
 
Lee @ Scan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the dancefloor reaching for the laser
Posts: 128
Lee @ Scan has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_avenger View Post
+1

takes all of 30 seconds and a handful of button presses.
Yeah, but there are those ( usually on talktalk ) who are of a certain age and can only just turn on their PC and look at the grandkids images on facebook, nevermind log into a router and adjust the settings.

When I installed my wireless at home I did a quick scan and found 16 local networks, out of which 5 were unsecure. A little walk to the shop with the iphone and the wireless application I have switched on has located them to just behind mine where there are quite a few bunglelows. I'm in the process of speaking to them as I know they'll all be sat outside tonight in the sun to offer my services (not like that you sick puppies!) and secure their networks as it's only a 5 min jobby
__________________
Women are like a half-eaten box of chocolates. All the good ones have already been taken, leaving the nutty ones behind
Lee @ Scan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2010, 01:20   #13
Faulk_Wulf
Internet Addict
 
Faulk_Wulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 402
Faulk_Wulf has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Love your neighbors but lock your doors.
No one should be pissy with Google at this.
If you're too lazy to put an encryption on your wifi,
well then tough cookies.

Routers honestly should come with WEP/WPA~2
switched on and make part of the set up, setting a password.
Save a lot of these kinds of discussions.

Wake me when they start cracking passwords to get in.
__________________
-- Faulken S. Wulf
"Under the Willow, he sleeps and dreams, of Heaven."
Looking over my threads, I've come to realize that I have a ridiculous amount of bad luck with my electronics.
Faulk_Wulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2010, 02:18   #14
thehippoz
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 5,780
thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
we live right across from a high school.. the kids there for years after school have been running unencrypted full shares everything- it's gotten better the last couple of years though

breaking wep is easy to do pretty much everybody is doing it.. remember when I setup my first wireless g network when it just came out.. was the only one around in my neighborhood and I thought I was soo secure running wep xD
thehippoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2010, 05:17   #15
giantegg
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
giantegg has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee @ Scan
Quote:
Originally Posted by mclean007 View Post
I say kudos to Google for owning up and taking immediate action.
Google didn't own up to it though. This was only found out after the Germans asked to the look at the data the streetcars collected.

If the Germans never asked for access, do you think they would have seriously owned up to it?
Pretty sure they were unaware of the privacy issues *until* the german authorities asked them to check it out.
Since then Google THEMSELVES have since requested a third party investigation to reassure people...

Personally I don't even see the problem - they were unsecured networks, and only portions of payload were taken, it's not like they camped outside someone's house for a week sucking up every bit of data traveling on their network, they drove past and snatched up a few random packets. Now I don't know how fast your wifi is, but I wouldn't be able to transmit a life's worth of personal data in a few seconds.

tl;dr: cry me a river.
giantegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2010, 07:29   #16
topgold
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
topgold has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
OK, tell me again why it's bad for my local shop, rail carriage or B&B to offer free and open wifi to those within range of the wireless access point. I'd expect free illumination to come on when I hit the switch and free water from the tap when I wash my hands. Why lock down a public service?
topgold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st Jun 2010, 13:28   #17
sb1991
Supermodder
 
sb1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 425
sb1991 has yet to learn the way of the Dremelsb1991 has yet to learn the way of the Dremelsb1991 has yet to learn the way of the Dremelsb1991 has yet to learn the way of the Dremelsb1991 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Well, it's not really free and neither are water or electricity. If you're paying for the train ride/buying goods in a shop then sure, but it isn't a public service. More importantly, collecting data on unsecured wireless networks potentially allows them to be taken advantage of if the data gets into the wrong hands (imagine if unsecured home networks showed up on google earth!). It's not so much that google might be out collecting people's personal data, but that somebody else might be able to if they got hold of google's information.
sb1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.