bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th Mar 2012, 10:39   #1
brumgrunt
Ultramodder
 
brumgrunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,009
brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
The story of artificial intelligence

The story of artificial intelligence, from chess to the possible end of humankind as we know it...

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2012/03/19/aisearch/1
brumgrunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 10:46   #2
PingCrosby
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sunny Redcar in Cleveland
Posts: 390
PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.PingCrosby is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
My Miele washing machine has more intelligence than some people I know
PingCrosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 10:55   #3
greigaitken
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 285
greigaitken has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I finished my degree in AI and CS many years ago. Almost always the main bottleneck in creating useful programs was coding all the rules, limitations and options.
would be ideal to have a new programming environment where the user already has this done and can drag and drop common rules like lego.
eg. find fastest route to top of building, you shouldnt have to code gravity limitations, and walls etc. every time.
greigaitken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 11:48   #4
fodder
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 156
fodder has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
@PingCrosby - Lol. So true.

@ greigaitken - But, doesn't that negate the meaning of AI? 'Intelligence' implies the ability to integrate current knowledge to solve problems and increase that knowledge. If you just have a 'list reader' then it's not really intelligent, just a large storage of data with an efficient recovery mechanism. (Sounds like Google).

Sentient beings learn by doing (mostly). I think it is this ability of our brains to be plastic that makes us intelligent. IE - Learning to walk is a constant alteration of neuronal connections until our reflexes and central nervous system balance the movements required with our weight and gravity. No one tells us the value of gravity, or the weight of the limb and it's fulcrum.
fodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 12:29   #5
BentAnat
Software Dev
 
BentAnat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Windhoek, Namibia
Posts: 6,330
BentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for president
@fodder:
Essentially, it's not all that fundamentally different.
We learn the use of our legs as well. Theoretically, given a few base rules, an AI is able to uild HUGE repositories of "learned data", which it could use to come up with new solutions.
Procssing that data is what computers struggle to do.
Just the basics of walking took years to get right, as there are so many factors to consider.
__________________
Find Jobs in Namibia | Events Namibia
BentAnat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 12:54   #6
Bauul
Sir Bongaminge
 
Bauul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Godalming, near Guildford
Posts: 2,173
Bauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run CrysisBauul can run Crysis
I don't think we'll get close to mimicking true human intelligence in a computer whilst not really understanding how human intelligence works.

Compared to a computer, we're unbelievably strange and illogical. Many of our decisions are made unconsciously by a section of the brain we have limited control over. Our memories fluctuate and change, and our opinions endlessly shift based on stimulus that we receive in an enormously varied number of ways.

The fact our brains are biological, that they are built of cells that live, die, change and change again means our intelligence is in a constant state of flux. Add to that endless chemical influences from internal and external sources, and the result is so endlessly illogical and random it'd be impossible for a non-biological entity to ever replicate it truly.

I'm not saying you won't ever get intelligent machines, they just won't have the same intelligence as humans.
__________________
Intel Core i5-2500K | 8Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1,600 Mhz
Gigabyte Geforce 460 GTX OC 1Gb | 1Tb + 1.5Tb Samsung Spinpoint F3 | Asrock Z68 Extreme4
Ibanez RG 470 Japanese Edition | 1991 Japanese Lo-TRS Tremolo | V7 S1 Custom V8 HSH Pickups
Bauul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 12:59   #7
BLC
Something witty goes here
 
BLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 2,383
BLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming SaiyanBLC is a Super Spamming Saiyan
A while ago, the Skeptic's Guide to the Universe podcast did an interview with Michael Vassar, the president of the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence (linky: http://www.theskepticsguide.org/arch...?mid=1&pid=218). It was pretty interesting stuff.

Interesting read; it's not something that I would have expected to find on bit-tech... Professor Sharkey may be right, however; at least for the time being. It's important to remember that no matter how much computing power you have or whatever algorithms you program, computers are fundamentally just big adding machines; albeit machines that can add up at inhuman speed. We really don't know how the human brain functions on such a fundamental level; until we know that, it may well be impossible to design a machine that can truly replicate emergent and "intelligent" behaviour. We've come a long way, but we're nowhere near that goal yet.

Incidentally, on the subject of Alan Turing, you should all go and visit Bletchley Park at some point. My girlfriend and I visited it around two weeks ago, and it was fascinating; if you do go, make sure to take one of the guided tours - our tour guide worked there during the war and knows so much about the entire site and all the work that went on there. There's quite a bit about Alan Turing there (including Gordon Brown's official apology letter), as well as the (fully working) rebuilt bombe, the Colossus and a huge collection of Enigma machines...

Plus you can also visit the National Museum of Computing and marvel at the four-foot diameter hard drive platters from the 60's/70's which only store 4mb per side; or get all nostalgic about all those old computers that you grew up with, now consigned to museum exhibits.
__________________
Asus Z87-K | Core i5 4670K | MSI GTX760 "TwinFrozr OC Edition" | 8GB Corsair Venegance 1600MHz
-------------------------------------------
Look ma, I do YouTube!
BLC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 13:04   #8
RedFlames
is not KidMod
 
RedFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The northern wastes of Geordieland
Posts: 4,239
RedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming SaiyanRedFlames is a Super Spamming Saiyan
completely off topic and train of thought de-railing but...

anyone know where i can get a bigger/full-sized version of this:




... carry on

[i'll read this and comment appropriately when i'm a little less dead...]
__________________
I have the heart of a child... in a jar... on my desk...

RedFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 15:17   #9
the_kille4
Chaos will rule da world.eventually
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near the equator
Posts: 213
the_kille4 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFlames
completely off topic and train of thought de-railing but...

anyone know where i can get a bigger/full-sized version of this:

would this one do?
__________________
Headphones/set: Grado SR325i | AKG K240 MK II
Mic: Antlion ModMic 2.3
Surround Amp: Onkyo TX-SR604
Speakers: Ceed 682F (Front) | Q Acoustics 2010i (Side) | Q Acoustics 1010i (Rear) | Q Acoustics 1000Ci (Center) | Q Acoustics 1000Si (Sub)
the_kille4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 15:46   #10
BentAnat
Software Dev
 
BentAnat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Windhoek, Namibia
Posts: 6,330
BentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for presidentBentAnat should be considered for president
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauul View Post
I don't think we'll get close to mimicking true human intelligence in a computer whilst not really understanding how human intelligence works.

Compared to a computer, we're unbelievably strange and illogical. Many of our decisions are made unconsciously by a section of the brain we have limited control over. Our memories fluctuate and change, and our opinions endlessly shift based on stimulus that we receive in an enormously varied number of ways.

The fact our brains are biological, that they are built of cells that live, die, change and change again means our intelligence is in a constant state of flux. Add to that endless chemical influences from internal and external sources, and the result is so endlessly illogical and random it'd be impossible for a non-biological entity to ever replicate it truly.

I'm not saying you won't ever get intelligent machines, they just won't have the same intelligence as humans.
Agree 100% with this.
There are a few things that are IMHO not simulatable: Emotion and Intuition to name but two.
Computers can pretty much by definition make "cold" decisions quicker and more logically than us (humans), but they lack a human factor that is so very important. Just the speed at which, without stepping through all the logical paths, a human brain can draw a conclusion about something based on nothing but what is describied as "gut feeling" is VERY hard, if not impossible to simulate with typical logic-based decisions.
In pure rationality, though, a computer (especially a self-taught system) would out-do us, though... /2c
__________________
Find Jobs in Namibia | Events Namibia
BentAnat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 19:53   #11
XXAOSICXX
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 541
XXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitXXAOSICXX is almost as Godly as yodasarmpit
Ahem.. "Most recently, the construction of the Large Hadron Collider hastened rumours that an artificially created black hole could destroy they entire planet"

I think you mean THE entire planet
XXAOSICXX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 20:46   #12
edzieba
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 531
edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
But in 2005, fiction became a reality when Japanese scientists created Asimo (an acronym which stands for Advanced Step in Innovative MObility), a plastic-shelled humanoid standing some four feet tall and capable of recognising objects, faces, hand gestures and speech.
Unless you count "has legs" as a defining characteristic of AI, this happened in the late '90s with Kismet, or even earlier depending on your definition of AI. Which is one of the biggest problems in AI research: the definition of AI, and it;s ever changing nature.

In reality, we have LOTS of AI. We use it all the time. Let me introduce the concept of 'hard AI' and 'soft AI'.

Hard AI is an artificial consciousness. This is immediately made a woolly definition by the choice between an artificial human consciousness (i.e. the only sort of consciousness we have encountered) or any general sort of consciousness, which thus far the definition of which has been hard to pin down.

Soft AI is a learning system. Oh, wait, we have those SLNN things, and they're certainly not really AI so that can't be it.
Soft AI is a system that can learn and produce emergent behaviour that is not programmed in or trained. Oh, wait, the Seven Dwarves and other swarm robots can do that, and they're certainly not really AI, so that can't be it.
Soft AI is a system that can recognise visual stimulus and classify them as known objects. Oh, wait, Google Goggles can do that, and that's certainly not really AI so that can't be it.
Soft AI is a system that can recognise and respond to natural spoken language. Oh, wait, Siri can do that, and that's certainly not really AI so that can't be it.

And so on. The goalposts of 'soft AI' move continuously as the next frontier is reached, achieved, and becomes mundane.


And once again, I must take issue with Sharkey's odd view on machine emotions and machine empathy (specifically, the lack thereof) and of the non-computational nature of the mind.
I'll address the latter first: If the mind is not computational (i.e. cannot be simulated) this implicitly requires you to accept Cartesian Dualism; that there must be an intangible something, a 'soul' or the like, that makes up the mind. This is silly.
On machine emotions: we have emotional machines. A machine can be 'afraid' or 'angry' or similar. We encounter these often: game AI. These aggregate states are machine emotions (e.g. when 'scared' an AI will attempt to hide from a player's sight, where otherwise it might wander looking for 'food', unless hiding would put it in danger in which case it would overcome it;s 'fear' enough to move into the player's sight and flee, before hiding again).
But what about empthy? We can make machines that recognise facial expressions (you can even download openCV and play with it yourself). We can make AIs that 'feel'. Input the detected emotion as an influence on the machine aggregate state (it's emotions) and Voila! You have an empathic machine.


I leave you with a final thought on the 'sentient machine apocalypse': a conscious AI would have a creator, and thus a parent/parents. When we grow up and become independent of our parents, we do not go on a murderous rampage. Why would we? And if not, why would an AI? We would have taught it all it knows, so unless we teach it that Destroy All Humans is good, then it's unlikely to think that way.
edzieba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Mar 2012, 21:03   #13
thehippoz
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 5,780
thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
oh man the old ai debate.. of course it could only be thought of by people who have never programmed anything.. programming and the hardware behind it are extensions of the programmer.. it cannot learn or do anything outside that box it's given

to put bluntly- when trying to create an ai out of non-living parts.. you've already lost.. course people with thier head in the clouds will never accept this.. there must be a way for a machine to think and write it's own code..

think of it like this.. when you write a program- and your trying to simulate the thought process.. your missing the one thing we have, that it can never have.. a soul if you will

sure you can have it process input and react to that input.. but to have it actually do something inspired outside of it's programming isn't going to happen.. you could have it act spontaneously with a random number generator here and there but it isn't thinking for itself- true or false, on and off, if then- that's what your dealing with

oh well I'll leave this here.. think can see a reflection of the guy who built this thing in the visor

Image Removed

How many times TheHippoz. You know that stuff like that isn't OK, so why do you do it?

Last edited by specofdust; 20th Mar 2012 at 09:00. Reason: Removing TheHippoz balls fetish related image
thehippoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 02:26   #14
Bakes
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 886
Bakes has yet to learn the way of the DremelBakes has yet to learn the way of the DremelBakes has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
The fact Noel Sharkey was quoted makes this article awesome.

Anyone else remember Robot Wars?

[QUOTE=thehippoz]oh man the old ai debate.. of course it could only be thought of by people who have never programmed anything.. programming and the hardware behind it are extensions of the programmer.. it cannot learn or do anything outside that box it's given

to put bluntly- when trying to create an ai out of non-living parts.. you've already lost.. course people with thier head in the clouds will never accept this.. there must be a way for a machine to think and write it's own code..

think of it like this.. when you write a program- and your trying to simulate the thought process.. your missing the one thing we have, that it can never have.. a soul if you will

sure you can have it process input and react to that input.. but to have it actually do something inspired outside of it's programming isn't going to happen.. you could have it act spontaneously with a random number generator here and there but it isn't thinking for itself- true or false, on and off, if then- that's what your dealing with

oh well I'll leave this here.. think can see a reflection of the guy who built this thing in the visor

image removed - specofdust

Just because something has been created, doesn't mean it can't be intelligent. Computer programs can write their own code, can improve according to what works and what doesn't, if you will. It would seem pretty silly to base your argument around 'BUT ROBOTS DON'T HAVE SOULS'.

Last edited by specofdust; 20th Mar 2012 at 09:01. Reason: Removing Hippoz picture of balls
Bakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 02:43   #15
Krazeh
I *am* a Dremel
 
Krazeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,892
Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.Krazeh is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakes View Post
Just because something has been created, doesn't mean it can't be intelligent. Computer programs can write their own code, can improve according to what works and what doesn't, if you will. It would seem pretty silly to base your argument around 'BUT ROBOTS DON'T HAVE SOULS'.
Having seen thehippoz's input into topics of a similar nature in SD I think it can safely be said that he doesn't really have much, if any, of a clue when it comes to these sorts of things. You're best just letting him have his say and moving on without acknowledging it tbh.
__________________
"My name is don don
I am pretty elephant
Love me well!"
Krazeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 04:43   #16
thehippoz
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 5,780
thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!thehippoz - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
bah had this conversation before a long time back.. I came to the conclusion everyone in the field has finally come to- only this was years before

http://forums.bit-tech.net/showpost....2&postcount=20

just because you read it in a science fiction novel or watch movies doesn't make it true.. it would be cool to tell you the truth- but really not much of a chance imo.. now mixing the two is interesting but considering we only use a small portion of our brain as it is.. probably better time spent figuring out how to access all of it instead of going that route..

you guys can believe otherwise.. we need people like that anyway- it's like the chupacabras keeps your brain turning when your out in the field late at night.. then you see it get in the car with some dood
thehippoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 07:02   #17
edzieba
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 531
edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.edzieba is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehippoz View Post
oh man the old ai debate.. of course it could only be thought of by people who have never programmed anything.. programming and the hardware behind it are extensions of the programmer.. it cannot learn or do anything outside that box it's given

to put bluntly- when trying to create an ai out of non-living parts.. you've already lost.. course people with thier head in the clouds will never accept this.. there must be a way for a machine to think and write it's own code..
To put it bluntly: you are completely wrong. Not only is it possible to programs to write their own code (polymorphic viruses and other malware will demonstrate this), but code certainly can 'learn and or do anything outside that box it's given'. Take Boids for example: You program an AI with three simply rules of avoiding crowding, aligning with neighbours, and aiming for the average position. These are pretty simple behaviours, but the behaviour that emerges is complex: flocking.
That's not to mention things like SLNNs and learning classifiers. These do bugger all when programmed, you have to train them with input data to get them to classify correctly. Different training data will result in different outputs, for the same code written.
edzieba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 12:46   #18
theevilelephant
Ultramodder
 
theevilelephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aberystwyth
Posts: 1,334
theevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysistheevilelephant can run Crysis
Do we have some all singing all dancing AI tech that is equivilent to a person?

Nope.

Are we close to that?

Nope.

Do we have some very impressive techniques that could be perceived as intelligent?

Yup, plenty.

One of the reasons A.I is so complex is that we dont have a definition of what we mean by intelligence, which makes it an even harder goal to achieve. Certainly we have things like the Turing test but that is by no means a definitive test of intelligence in a computer system.
__________________
Core i5 2500K || GA-Z68XP-UD3P || 8Gb 1600 LP Corsair Vengeance || Nvidia 570 GTX || Crucial M4 256Gb
theevilelephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 14:47   #19
fodder
Multimodder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 156
fodder has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Just what I was about to write on, having cogitated over the reply to my last post.

Maybe, what we are trying to think of as AI, is self awareness. Once something is self aware, it becomes more self guided in it's decisions about the world it inhabits. You could program conditions into an AI to cause itself harm, but if it was self aware would it then follow that programming or decide to follow another string of code instead? (I am not a programmer, so that's my take on it).

In terms of the '1's and 0's' being all a computer can do, we are the same. A neurone fires or it doesn't. It may take several other neurones firing at the same time at the synapse to get that neurone to fire, but it is still 'on' or 'off'. Put inhibitory neurones into the equation and you can start to get a system that starts to look analogue despite being 1's and 0's at the operating level.
fodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th Mar 2012, 17:00   #20
Tribble
Steals Avatars
 
Tribble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: nr london, UK.
Posts: 576
Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Tribble - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by PingCrosby View Post
My Miele washing machine has more intelligence than some people I know

arh yes the miele washing machine is a bit of engineering genius, well mine is


Quote:
Originally Posted by thehippoz View Post
but considering we only use a small portion of our brain as it is.. probably better time spent figuring out how to access all of it instead of going that route..
http://www.neatorama.com/2008/09/05/...-in-the-world/
__________________
I was looking for a moderator to change my signature, and I found one. Now I won't change this signature, otherwise I might be banned

Last edited by Tribble; 20th Mar 2012 at 17:21. Reason: became more interesting
Tribble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:46.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.