bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th May 2012, 18:00   #1
brumgrunt
Ultramodder
 
brumgrunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,009
brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
Apple goof opens FileVault hole in OS X

A flawed update from Apple has opened a serious security hole in the company's FileVault encryption

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/20...levault-flaw/1
brumgrunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2012, 19:36   #2
schmidtbag
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 753
schmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on you
"With Apple fans often claiming that the company's systems are somehow less vulnerable to attack than those from long-time rival Microsoft"

That's where apple users don't know the difference between malware vulnerability and hacking vulnerability. All unix based and unix-like systems are naturally resistant to malware, whereas WIndows is naturally insecure about infections. But, hacking is a separate story.

However, hacking is so different that it isn't (or shouldn't be) entirely the OS's obligation to protect against such a thing. When someone attempts to hack into your stuff, you've either pissed someone off or you made others aware of who you are and what you have. That being said, its kind of the user's fault if anything breaches a computer via non-malware methods. In the situation of users getting their things hacked when relying on Apple's FileVault, well that is also Apple's fault because they made an unreliable product.
__________________
4.4GHz FX-6300 (on an AM3 board) with C'n'Q on, 6GB of RAM, 2x ATI HD5750, ADATA SP900 64GB SSD, Arch Linux 64 bit.
schmidtbag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2012, 21:33   #3
Snips
I can do dat, giz a job
 
Snips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: wiv me kids
Posts: 1,864
Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.Snips is definitely a rep cheat.
Oops! I'm sure they will have it fixed sooner or later. If you are using Apple OSX then try downloading Microsoft Security Essentials
Snips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2012, 21:35   #4
Andy Mc
I *am* a Dremel
 
Andy Mc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a house.
Posts: 1,621
Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.
Wonder how long it will take them to pull their finger out and patch this?

I call 6 months.
__________________
Andy Mc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 00:08   #5
Cei
pew pew pew
 
Cei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,489
Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Interesting. When will Bit-Tech start posting news articles on every Windows flaw?
__________________
Join the BitSec organisation in Star Citizen!
i7 3770K | Asus RoG Maximus V Gene | 16GB 1866Mhz Vengeance | Crucial M4 256 & Samsung EVO 500 | Corsair H80 | Corsair AX750 | EVGA GTX 780 SC 3GB | Silverstone FT03
i5 4670K | Asus RoG Maximus VI Impact | 8GB 1866Mhz Vengeance LP | Samsung 840 EVO 128GB | Noctua NH-U9B SE2 | EVGA GTX 770 SC 2GB | EVGA Hadron Air
Cei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 00:39   #6
AmEv
Meow meow. See yall in 2-ish years!
 
AmEv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 1,173
AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.AmEv is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
Interesting. When will Bit-Tech start posting news articles on every Windows flaw?
Funny.

Seriously though, it isn't that Windows is/isn't flawed, it's that most of the users that we hear about claim that OS(X) is immune from inoperability. As in, there is 0 malware for it.

Another thread.
__________________
The Elder is away.
AmEv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 02:35   #7
Andy Mc
I *am* a Dremel
 
Andy Mc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a house.
Posts: 1,621
Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.Andy Mc is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
Interesting. When will Bit-Tech start posting news articles on every Windows flaw?
I think the issue here is more about Apples approach to security patching, they are just terrible at it.

MS will patch issues quite quickly whereas Apple will drag their feet and still insist on telling their users that they do not need to use any form of AV software on their Mac.

This issue was first seen 3 months ago! Theres more on it here: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/a...ear-text/11963
__________________

Last edited by Andy Mc; 8th May 2012 at 02:45.
Andy Mc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 07:15   #8
fluxtatic
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 483
fluxtatic has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
This just in from my local Genius (tm) - "Whatever are you talking about? There's no problem, no vulnerability here. Just as the Great Steve (tm) decreed, 'OS X is invulnerable to any sort of problems at all. It's no more vulnerable to hacking or viruses than your toaster.' So, you see? Nothing to see here. Want to buy a new shiny to give your life meaning?"

There you have it, folks. Every tech site on the planet is just dead wrong about this.
fluxtatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 07:18   #9
modfx
Loft Gremlin
 
modfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hiding in your attic
Posts: 209
modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!modfx - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
A massive scale attack on apple would be most amusing. A few people I know are the "head in the sand lalallalalala Apple cant get viruses and are the most awesome creation known to man. Why? It's Apple, you don't ask why, they just are." types and it would be funny to see their beloved Mac crumble.

By no means is this aimed at Mac users in general. Fanboys of any description irritate me.
__________________
Modified Silverstone Temjin TJ-07B - Core i7 920 - Asus Rampage II Extreme - 3x2Gb Corsair Dominator 1600MHz - GTX570 - 9600GT - 128GB Crucial M4 - 1tb Samsung Spinpoint F3 - Corsair HX1000W -Win 7 HP 64 bit - Samsung 206BW
modfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 08:00   #10
Gareth Halfacree
WIIGII!
bit-tech Staff
 
Gareth Halfacree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 3,772
Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
Interesting. When will Bit-Tech start posting news articles on every Windows flaw?
Like this one? How about this one? This one? Perhaps this one? This one? This little round-up? This one? This one? This one? This one in Sharepoint?

If a vulnerability is news-worthy, it gets mentioned - regardless of platform. We don't cover every Windows vulnerability - partly because there's too many of 'em, and partly 'cos we're not a security-focused site - but we try to cover the highlights.

And, I think you'll agree once the Apple-provided scales have fallen from your eyes, storing the passwords for encryption software on the disk in plain-text is definitely a highlight. If Microsoft had done the same, you'd better believe we'd have reported it.
__________________
Author, Raspberry Pi User Guide, Meet the Raspberry Pi | gareth.halfacree.co.uk | twitter
bit-tech news correspondent, Custom PC columnist, other things to other people
I'm a filthy freelancer! Hire me!
Gareth Halfacree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 09:36   #11
FelixTech
Robot
 
FelixTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 346
FelixTech has yet to learn the way of the DremelFelixTech has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I'm fairly sure you can bypass Wndows login screens over firewire unless there are non-default settings for the port. However, OSX is the only operating system stupid enough to let you read any bypassed passwords in plain text! It's quite easy to do really! :O
__________________
Use ClickMechanic for car repairs and servicing!
Play Animal Shogi for free on Android!
FelixTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 12:22   #12
Cei
pew pew pew
 
Cei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,489
Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Cei is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth Halfacree
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
Interesting. When will Bit-Tech start posting news articles on every Windows flaw?
Like this one? How about this one? This one? Perhaps this one? This one? This little round-up? This one? This one? This one? This one in Sharepoint?

If a vulnerability is news-worthy, it gets mentioned - regardless of platform. We don't cover every Windows vulnerability - partly because there's too many of 'em, and partly 'cos we're not a security-focused site - but we try to cover the highlights.

And, I think you'll agree once the Apple-provided scales have fallen from your eyes, storing the passwords for encryption software on the disk in plain-text is definitely a highlight. If Microsoft had done the same, you'd better believe we'd have reported it.
Oh don't get me wrong Gareth, this is a flaw in OS X, and a ridiculous one at that - particularly for any owners that have upgraded from previous OS X versions whilst using FileVault. Yet the fact that you need physical access to the machine begins to turn this in to something that its more academic than a threat to the average internet user.

Your list of links, though pretty, all seem to date from 20120 (apart from a single one in Jan 2011 and a single 2012 article). We've then had a whole spate of Apple ones in recent times, and no comment on what happens to Windows.

I guess my point is that, as you say, B-T isn't a security website, and so any article you do post is going to have to be of above average interest to the readers. So why post Apple-related ones, on a security flaw requiring physical access, when basically ignoring what goes on with Windows since 2010?
__________________
Join the BitSec organisation in Star Citizen!
i7 3770K | Asus RoG Maximus V Gene | 16GB 1866Mhz Vengeance | Crucial M4 256 & Samsung EVO 500 | Corsair H80 | Corsair AX750 | EVGA GTX 780 SC 3GB | Silverstone FT03
i5 4670K | Asus RoG Maximus VI Impact | 8GB 1866Mhz Vengeance LP | Samsung 840 EVO 128GB | Noctua NH-U9B SE2 | EVGA GTX 770 SC 2GB | EVGA Hadron Air
Cei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 12:42   #13
Gareth Halfacree
WIIGII!
bit-tech Staff
 
Gareth Halfacree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 3,772
Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
Yet the fact that you need physical access to the machine begins to turn this in to something that its more academic than a threat to the average internet user.
Combine it with the drive-by downloader which gains administrative access to OS X without the user's knowledge, and you have a way to remotely harvest passwords for FileVault partitions. Considering that the whole point of FileVault is to protect your privacy in the event of local or remote intrusion, I'd say that's a serious threat indeed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cei View Post
I guess my point is that, as you say, B-T isn't a security website, and so any article you do post is going to have to be of above average interest to the readers. So why post Apple-related ones, on a security flaw requiring physical access, when basically ignoring what goes on with Windows since 2010?
Ignoring what goes on with Windows since 2010? Whatever you're smoking, I'll have some.

I stopped writing for bit-tech a while back, then started again when Simon took over. If you're wondering why there weren't so many stories in 2011 as in 2010 - I wasn't here to write them!

As for the 'whole spate' of Apple security articles, I count a massive two in 2012: this article, and one about the first drive-by downloader for OS X in the wild. Both, I would say, are very much newsworthy and deserve to appear on bit-tech.

In the same space of time - i.e. since 1st January 2012 - there have also been two stories about the Microsoft Windows RDP vulnerability and one about Google's cash-for-vulns programme.

I would say an equal number of articles about vulnerabilities in Windows as about vulnerabilities in OS X is fair, wouldn't you?

As for 'ignoring' Windows vulnerabilities, it's quite simple: a new drive-by downloader for Windows isn't news. There are hundreds of them. The majority aren't very successful. The world's first drive-by downloader for OS X, which has a confirmed list of victims 550,000-long? That's news. If it were the first drive-by downloader for Windows, I'd have written about it too.

The biggest security SNAFU of the year from Microsoft was the RDP vulnerability, which got two stories. The biggest SNAFUs from Apple were the drive-by downloader - which at half a milion victims on an OS the company has claimed is immune to viruses, is big news - and the FileVault bug.

You want me to write more about Windows vulnerabilities than Apple vulnerabilities? Go find some interesting vulnerabilities in Windows, and I'll write about 'em. It's really as simple as that.
__________________
Author, Raspberry Pi User Guide, Meet the Raspberry Pi | gareth.halfacree.co.uk | twitter
bit-tech news correspondent, Custom PC columnist, other things to other people
I'm a filthy freelancer! Hire me!

Last edited by Gareth Halfacree; 8th May 2012 at 12:50.
Gareth Halfacree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 12:50   #14
cookie! nom nom
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!cookie! nom nom - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
meh, mistakes happen..... it not like people priviet info can be used/seen
cookie! nom nom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 15:05   #15
schmidtbag
Hypermodder
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 753
schmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youschmidtbag - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on you
Quote:
Originally Posted by cookie! nom nom
meh, mistakes happen..... it not like people priviet info can be used/seen
that's true, but there's a difference between making a mistake and then just being ignorant about something. anyone who knows anything about computers knows that an easily accessible text file is not something you store data that should otherwise be hidden/encrypted.
__________________
4.4GHz FX-6300 (on an AM3 board) with C'n'Q on, 6GB of RAM, 2x ATI HD5750, ADATA SP900 64GB SSD, Arch Linux 64 bit.
schmidtbag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 18:32   #16
Paulg1971
Multimodder
 
Paulg1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 90
Paulg1971 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Another thing to consider is that most pc users have some form of security on their machines where as apple users still have their heads up their arses and have no security so highlighting problems for apple makes good sense(and gives pc users a good laugh)
Paulg1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2012, 19:33   #17
lamboman
I *am* a Dremel
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,509
lamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulg1971 View Post
Another thing to consider is that most pc users have some form of security on their machines where as apple users still have their heads up their arses and have no security so highlighting problems for apple makes good sense(and gives pc users a good laugh)
A vague statement to make. What do you mean by "security"? What form of security specifically?

Either way, if your statement were true, there wouldn't be such a ridiculous amount of infected Windows systems.

Furthermore, Windows users have nothing to laugh at. There are still quite a few more threats for Windows PCs, to say the least. Not because Windows is a more insecure platform, merely because there are more users. At the same time, Mac users who claim that their systems are invincible to every threat known to man need to be lined up and shot, frankly.

All operating systems have vulnerabilities. No point in arguing that one platform is more secure than the other, because there will always be more vulnerabilities found for any platform.

Finally, a huge proportion of security issues are caused by the user. Stick up a firewall, have some decent anti-malware protection, and most importantly, use some common sense.

I am by no means a security expert. Quite frankly, anybody could say what I've just said.

EDIT: I should also add that I would agree that Apple can be slow to issue updates, not just for security issues but for other problems too (take the 2011 iMac's Wi-Fi issues that weren't fixed for 6 months). If they're kicked about enough on the Internet, updates will be issued quicker. However, it shouldn't be like that. This FileVault issue is a "tad" silly...

Last edited by lamboman; 8th May 2012 at 19:41.
lamboman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2012, 08:59   #18
Gareth Halfacree
WIIGII!
bit-tech Staff
 
Gareth Halfacree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 3,772
Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.Gareth Halfacree is definitely a rep cheat.
Apple has now fixed the FileVault bug (along with a few other security holes) in OS X 10.7.4, plus another hole in Safari with 5.1.7. If you're a Mac user, it's time to update.
__________________
Author, Raspberry Pi User Guide, Meet the Raspberry Pi | gareth.halfacree.co.uk | twitter
bit-tech news correspondent, Custom PC columnist, other things to other people
I'm a filthy freelancer! Hire me!
Gareth Halfacree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2012, 07:51   #19
slothy89
MicroModder
 
slothy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 145
slothy89 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
I laugh at all this Windows vs Mac banter! Neither is superior to the other.

I own both, and know the weaknesses each possess. I cringe when I hear a salesman tell a naive customer that their shiny new iMac doesn't need Internet security, as the days of the secure mac are gone. With more and more clueless consumers buying macs, the concentration of Mac PCs is increasing, whilst the average IT knowledge of mac users dropping. This makes macs a more viable target for malware devs.

That said, I don't run any fancy security suite on my Windows or Mac PCs as one I don't want to pay, and two from my experience most infections are the result of opening spam emails or downloading fake torrents etc. in other words, lack of common sense. I have not had one issue with malware in the past 5 years of having my own private PC Internet connected.

Ultimately it is the lump of flesh that tells the shiny box what to do that is the main vulnerability on any system whether it's Windows, Mac, Linux or otherwise.

Good story!
__________________
CPU : Intel i7 2600K @4.5GHz ~ Cooler : Zalman CNPS 9900MAX Blue
GPU : 2xSLI Gainward GTX460 1GB GLH ~ PSU : Superflower 800W Modular
Mobo : ASUS P8P67 Pro B3 ~ RAM : 4x4GB (16GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 @ 9-9-9-24
Case : Zalman Z9+ (filled with Xigmatek XLF fans 120mm&140mm)
Storage : 120GB OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS - 1TB WD Caviar Black SATA III
slothy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2012, 11:19   #20
lamboman
I *am* a Dremel
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,509
lamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremellamboman has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Quote:
Originally Posted by slothy89 View Post
*snip*
Couldn't agree more. That said, always worth having anti-virus software just to scan anything that does come in, just in case.
lamboman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.