bit-tech.net

Go Back   bit-tech.net Forums > bit-tech.net > Article Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:04   #1
brumgrunt
Ultramodder
 
brumgrunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,009
brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.brumgrunt is a hoopy frood who really knows where their towel is.
AMD FX-8120 review

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...-8120-review/1
brumgrunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:18   #2
Harlequin
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Harlequin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Eastbourne ,East Sussex ,UK
Posts: 4,760
Harlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming Saiyan
A question - did you apply both bulldozer hotfixes to windows?
__________________
i have a 3dfx voodoo5 6000
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:25   #3
longweight
Possibly Longbeard.
 
longweight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Posts: 10,517
longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.longweight is definitely a rep cheat.
Oh dear AMD, I'd love it if they could produce something that at least provides a bit of competition for Intel!

Nice review
longweight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:28   #4
SMIFFYDUDE
Supermodders on my D
 
SMIFFYDUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saddleworth
Posts: 2,426
SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.SMIFFYDUDE is definitely a rep cheat.
Intel could go on holiday for 5 years, come back and still be beating AMD's new cpus.
How old is the i7 920 now?
Shame seeing the FX brand used on chips like this.
__________________
Cooler Master HAF 932 | ASUS Rampage II Extreme | i7 930@4.1 | Corsair H50 | 12GB OCZ PC3-12800 Gold | x2 Palit GTX 560Ti 2GB | XFX Pro 750W XXX | HP LP2475w | Speedlink Medusa NX 5.1 | CM Storm Inferno | Logitech G27 | Windows 7 Home Premium

SMIFFYDUDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:45   #5
greigaitken
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 283
greigaitken has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
saw amd review and thought 'oh dear lets see what they got this time' and clicked on link. Turns out it's still poor little amd cant climb up to the tree house.
greigaitken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:46   #6
Harlequin
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Harlequin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Eastbourne ,East Sussex ,UK
Posts: 4,760
Harlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming Saiyan
http://ark.intel.com/products/37147/...-GTs-Intel-QPI)


3 1/2 years old

whilst at the top end AMD havent got a chance - with APU`s the roles are reversed - intel are still playing catchup to AMD


edit:

OP

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2646060

^^ First apply this bulldozer hotfix then

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2645594

^^ second hotfix to be applied
__________________
i have a 3dfx voodoo5 6000
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 09:47   #7
themassau
Minimodder
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27
themassau has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
acurally in my country a i5 costs as much as a 8150. but i bought the 8120 because it was 50 euros cheaper. alse am3+ motherboards are more higher quality at the same price point. so i bought the saberthoot.

i also want to learn parallel programming so i could check how it scales at more cores. my previeus cpu was a athlon 6000+ so it feels like an upgrade.

but i will upgrade again when ddr4 is out en when descent APU's are on the market.
themassau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 11:42   #8
MjFrosty
Hypermodder
 
MjFrosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Surrey UK
Posts: 853
MjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on youMjFrosty - may the hammer of Bindi be bestowed on you
FX 55, what a CPU that was.

They need to recruit some new engineers me thinks.
__________________
Fast
MjFrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 12:42   #9
.//TuNdRa
Resident Bulldozer Guru
 
.//TuNdRa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northamptonshire Region.
Posts: 3,798
.//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat.
It's not the engineers. AMD is using artificially generated CPU Silicon designs, not the original Hand-designed, carefully planned pathways that wound up more efficient and smaller. Which is letting them down in some areas.

So; I suppose it is the engineers, or at least; the lack of them, which is causing issues like this.

Bulldozer's Ridiculously long development cycle didn't help the chip. Considering AMD had to take a shot at the future from, what? Six years ago? They've not falling that far off the mark.

I'm amazed that, for once, A reviewer didn't get a chip that'd do crazy things, though. I can hit 5ghz on this chip. Albiet; not 100% stably. 4.8-4.9 seems to be the ceiling, so far as I've tested.

I'm never going to hear the end of this review, though. I could break out in the usual "Oh! Cinebench is optimized for Intel chips!" and all that crap, but it wouldn't change the other results. What really ruins the performance in things like the Image Editing is probably the memory speeds. Even the i3 2100 is capable of achieving higher memory bandwidth than the FX 8120.
__________________
Dozy Beast: AMD FX8120 | Thermalright Archon | Asus Crosshair V Formula | 16GB (4x4GB) Corsair Vengeance LP | Asus Xonar DX/XD | 2X SLI KFA2 550Ti White Edition | Silverstone SSTG1000W | Silverstone Raven RV-02B V1.7 | OCZ Agility 3 60GB | 2x WD 3TB RED RAID0 | Lite-on Blu-ray ROM
Dell U2913WM | Sennheiser HD 485s | Creative Gigaworks T40s | Logitech G13 | Microsoft Sidewinder X6 | Cyborg R.A.T 9
.//TuNdRa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 13:28   #10
Harlequin
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Harlequin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Eastbourne ,East Sussex ,UK
Posts: 4,760
Harlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming Saiyan
http://www.insideris.com/amd-spreads...ee-speaks-out/

Quote:
Now, we did some digging and found out quite few interesting things. Here is a quote from the AMD ex employee himself, who posted few comments about the whole situation some time ago:


On paper bulldozer is a lovely chip. Bulldozer was on the drawing board (people were even working on it) even back when I was there. All I can say is that by the time you see silicon for sale, it will be a lot less impressive, both in its own terms and when compared to what Intel will be offering. (Because I have no faith AMD knows how to actually design chips anymore). I don’t really want to reveal what I know about Bulldozer from my time at AMD.


What did happen is that management decided there SHOULD BE such cross-engineering ,which meant we had to stop hand-crafting our CPU designs and switch to an SoC design style. This results in giving up a lot of performance, chip area, and efficiency. The reason DEC Alphas were always much faster than anything else is they designed each transistor by hand. Intel and AMD had always done so at least for the critical parts of the chip. That changed before I left – they started to rely on synthesis tools, automatic place and route tools, etc. I had been in charge of our design flow in the years before I left, and I had tested these tools by asking the companies who sold them to design blocks (adders, multipliers, etc.) using their tools. I let them take as long as they wanted. They always came back to me with designs that were 20% bigger, and 20% slower than our hand-crafted designs, and which suffered from electromigration and other problems.

That is now how AMD designs chips. I’m sure it will turn out well for them [/sarcasm]



BTW, you ask how AMD could have competed? Well, for one thing, the could have leveraged K8 and the K8 team’s success and design techniques instead of wasting years of time on a project that eventually got cancelled using people that had never achieved any success. It took Intel years to come out with Nehalem, and AMD could have been so far ahead by that point that they’d have enough money in the bank that they wouldn’t have to accept a low-ball settlement offer in the antitrust suit and they wouldn’t have to sell off their fabs.

Gives a totally different perspective on why Bulldozer failed, doesn’t

that italic parts are from 2010 - and the article i linked to is from 2011!
__________________
i have a 3dfx voodoo5 6000
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 13:30   #11
bagman
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
bagman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Swedish but in Loughborough
Posts: 3,525
bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.bagman is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by .//TuNdRa View Post
Bulldozer's Ridiculously long development cycle didn't help the chip. Considering AMD had to take a shot at the future from, what? Six years ago? They've not falling that far off the mark.
Intel start to develop their chips 10 years in advance. But you also have to consider that the bulldozer chips were made under a time of uncertainty at AMD with new (was it new CEOs like every month or something because the share holders weren't happy?).

What I don't understand is how inefficient the bulldozer chips are. 579W @4.65GHz for a chip far from the performance of a i7 920 @4GHz which draws 411W.
__________________
Apple = For the incompetent.
My sister owns a iMac, the shame.
bagman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 13:46   #12
Jhodas
Theorist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 26
Jhodas has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
AMD made some weird design choices. Follow this link for a comparison of the X6 1100, X4 980 and FX 8150. The L1 data cache size is smaller on the new FX for a start. (16k vs 64k)
AMD has also gone for massive 64-way associativity on the FXs L3 Cache. Associativity reduces cache misses, but increases cache latency. Ivy's L1 and L2 cache is 8-way and L3 is 16-way, which appears to be a better compromise (FX 8150 has 4-way L1 data, 2-way L1-instruction and 16-way L2 data).

Overall, Intel's cache design seems to be simpler and more effective. I think this is one of the main issues Bulldozer has besides the memory controller.
Jhodas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 14:17   #13
Bkid
What's a Dremel?
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Bkid has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
Will be interesting to see, if AMD can make a dual core processor with 4 or 5 GHZ stock speed without any overclocking. Because i'll be the first one to buy it. :-)
Bkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 14:49   #14
Hustler
Hypermodder
 
Hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 619
Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.Hustler is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Still only a Quad Core with some fancy new Hyper Threading thrown in.

Dishonest marketing from AMD.
Hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 14:55   #15
Zinfandel
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Zinfandel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Egham
Posts: 3,207
Zinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpitZinfandel is almost as Godly as yodasarmpit
Why do they even bother?
__________________
I request you to interact on this forum in a streetwise style without going against the Data Protection Act.
Zinfandel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 14:57   #16
Harlequin
I Mod, Therefore I Own
 
Harlequin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Eastbourne ,East Sussex ,UK
Posts: 4,760
Harlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming SaiyanHarlequin is a Super Spamming Saiyan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zinfandel View Post
Why do they even bother?
well if they didnt your fancy new ivy bridge i5 replacement would start at 500 and head upwards.....
__________________
i have a 3dfx voodoo5 6000
Harlequin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 15:46   #17
[USRF]Obiwan
I *am* a Dremel
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,703
[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.[USRF]Obiwan is the Cheesecake. Relix smiles down upon them.
Their biggest mistake AMD made was to make these new cpu's for a new socket. Instead they could have used it on the AM3 (non plus) and a lot of customers would have bought it as replacement.
__________________
Mascleta: "The most accurate simulation of thunder, humans can simulate..."
The answer is 42, so... whats the question again?
If you know what 'Peek' and 'Poke' represents, then you are probably as old as me.
In 1982 I was addicted to Lady Bug and played it in the local arcade (every day) And yes i'm proud I did that!
[USRF]Obiwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 16:00   #18
tad2008
Supermodder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 311
tad2008 has yet to learn the way of the Dremel
AMD's stuff has certainly been a bit hit and miss over the years and desperately feel the need to upgrade as I am still using an AMD 64 X2 6000+ CPU on the AM2 socket with a mere 2GB ram and a Radeon HD6850 graphics card under XP.

I had thought of going with AMD's FM1 socket and the Athlon II X4 651K Black Edition CPU til I realised that the FM1 socket is already obsolete and would leave no future upgrade path and simply can't afford the extra layout for an Intel i3 2100 let alone an i5 2400.

Soo frustrating...
tad2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 16:13   #19
.//TuNdRa
Resident Bulldozer Guru
 
.//TuNdRa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northamptonshire Region.
Posts: 3,798
.//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat..//TuNdRa is definitely a rep cheat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
Still only a Quad Core with some fancy new Hyper Threading thrown in.

Dishonest marketing from AMD.
Not entirely. Some parts of it are completely doubled. It's more like 1.7 cores per module. It's just the Integer units aren't doubled, which means Bulldozer Tanks in any mathematical tests that stress more than four cores.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bagman View Post
Intel start to develop their chips 10 years in advance. But you also have to consider that the bulldozer chips were made under a time of uncertainty at AMD with new (was it new CEOs like every month or something because the share holders weren't happy?).

What I don't understand is how inefficient the bulldozer chips are. 579W @4.65GHz for a chip far from the performance of a i7 920 @4GHz which draws 411W.
Chip production issues. This current batch are very, very badly produced. Bulldozer would have been much better if it didn't have this much in the way of silicon leakage. The new Stepping AMD is planning to roll out at some point (Although I'm not sure if that's been canned in favour of Piledriver) is said not to have as bad a case of these issues, but I don't hold much hope.

I'm committed now, with the amount of money i've sunk into this, and I will fight tooth and nail to prove that it's not crap, but I'm never, ever going to claim it's the best, or anywhere near.
__________________
Dozy Beast: AMD FX8120 | Thermalright Archon | Asus Crosshair V Formula | 16GB (4x4GB) Corsair Vengeance LP | Asus Xonar DX/XD | 2X SLI KFA2 550Ti White Edition | Silverstone SSTG1000W | Silverstone Raven RV-02B V1.7 | OCZ Agility 3 60GB | 2x WD 3TB RED RAID0 | Lite-on Blu-ray ROM
Dell U2913WM | Sennheiser HD 485s | Creative Gigaworks T40s | Logitech G13 | Microsoft Sidewinder X6 | Cyborg R.A.T 9
.//TuNdRa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2012, 18:05   #20
Action_Parsnip
Hypermodder
 
Action_Parsnip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Exeter
Posts: 719
Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!Action_Parsnip - it's over 9000!!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
There is no B3 stepping of Bulldozer coming. The next version will be the piledriver version.
__________________
"Ooh he card read good!"

Q6700@3.475ghz 9x386mhz, Asus P5-B Deluxe WIFI-AP, 2x2gb Kingston 1066 @965mhz 5-5-5-15, western Digital Caviar Black 1tb HDD, Titan Fenrir, PC Power&Cooling 750w, XFX 4890
Action_Parsnip is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.