|
|
#1 |
|
Just another nobody
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,671
![]() |
Electronics guide part 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Trust the Computer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,797
![]() |
Brilliant
<A88> |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 319
![]() |
Great stuff.
I would like to make a couple of suggestions. When calculating resistors for LED use, remember to work out the power dissipation in the resistor and choose a resistor that can handle it. This is almost never a problem for 1 or 2 LED's, but put a heap of LED's in parallel and you can start burning resistors. Because LED's are a PN junction device, the potential across them is fixed, provided the supply voltage is at least the forward voltage. This is what makes it possible to choose a resistor to limit the current from a suitable value. Feel free to take or paraphrase material from here, http://forums.bit-tech.net/showthread.php?t=88511 But if you do this i would like to be credited in the article. I'd be happy to make suggestions / comments / help write future parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lazy Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 'States
Posts: 4,529
![]() |
Great to see an electronics guide on bit-tech at long last
__________________
Technology Schmecnology |
|
|
|
| RotoSequence |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RotoSequence |
|
|
#5 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At my desk.
Posts: 687
![]() |
cool first part, makes a lot of sense. hopefully this will stop me posting "help, im a n00b!" posts int he electronics forum...
![]() eagerly looking forward to the full series, and creating some cool stuff to make my cases a little more whizz-bang |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Your appeal has already been filed.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
![]() |
Looks very useful, will stay tuned for part 2!
__________________
om nom nom nom |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Smitten ;)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 709
![]() |
Good beginners guide, I cant wait for the section on Thevenin and Nortons theorems
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Bored
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rochester Kent
Posts: 1,268
![]() |
WooooO00o0o0o0o0o0 yay.
A modding article for a change Very well written, if i 'twas a noob id understand that well! Certainly easier than Q= 1/2CV^2 or other pants like that.
__________________
>[DFI LAN-PArty UT NF4 Ultra-D]-[Athlon64 3200+ Winchester]-[1Gb Corsair pc3200]-[Vapochill Micro]-[Powercolor ATI Radeon X800XL 256Mb]-[Chieftec DX-01-YL With 6 Fans]< Pug- "The spirit of modding is unleashing your creativity in the pursuit of individuality." Current Project: Unnamed Chieftec Dragon Mod |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At home
Posts: 807
![]() |
at last a beginners guide that i can understand.looking forward to part 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Multimodder
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Slightly south of lost
Posts: 173
![]() |
Great stuff
I'm not the most prolific poster but I use BitTech as a source of reference a great deal and this addtion makes it only more useful. Nice one
__________________
Ain't nothing cooler than a small brown dog! |
|
|
|
| Alwayz Dead |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Alwayz Dead |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 319
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 306
![]() |
rough guess here (a guess, mind you)
hes being sarcastic/joking... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Here comes the farmer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 3,519
![]() |
sweet.
Nice one acrim. - S
__________________
\o/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Smitten ;)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 709
![]() |
Off Topic: Interesting how the New Zealander understood the sarcasm and the aussie didnt. Read into it what you will
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Modder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 66
![]() |
ye, thats a really good guide for noobss like me
__________________
Sex Is Nice, Do It Twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 550
![]() |
Last time I checked, current was a flow of positive charge, not of electrons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 319
![]() |
In the majority of cases, current flowing through solid metals, or graphite, etc, the sole charge carriers are electrons.
Last edited by g0th; 3rd May 2005 at 05:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 550
![]() |
Quote:
That still doesn't change the fact that current is the measure of postive charge flow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 319
![]() |
Yeah, you're talking about 'conventional current', which is one of the Stupidest Things Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Custom User Title:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 4,060
![]() |
Quote:
I see where you're coming from - but positive charge arises due to electrons flowing in the opposite direction. The more electrons flow, the greater the 'positive charge flow' and so the greater the current. In some respects I am wrong to say that electricity comes about due to electrons as electricity can arise due to proton flow in liquid metals - however I'm just going to be working with Molexs, not mecury, so for the first part of the guide at least, I think this level of understanding is far more than enough.
__________________
Kemp yourself silly: www.rosskemp.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|