|
|
#1 |
|
Just another nobody
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,671
![]() |
ECS PF21 Extreme
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Biggleswade
Posts: 445
![]() |
how would you say this mobo compares to the Abit Fatal1ty AN8 SKT939?
__________________
xp 2500+ m running at 2.5GHz, 9700 pro (massivley overclocked) 1 gig of pc 3700 twister, abit nf7-s v2.0, 80 gig WD s-ata, akasa 480w
CM Stacker watercooled fully with a thermochill 120.3 in bottom -------------------------------------------------- A64 3200+ winnie at 2.4, gainward 7900gs 256mb, i gig of OCZ vx4000 Gold, lanparty RDX-200 crossfire mobo, 250 gig + 2x80 gig WD s-ata, tagan power 420w lian li v1000 no longer watercooled, but silent on air ![]() |
|
|
|
| jopers1986 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by jopers1986 |
|
|
#3 |
|
Gas Mask..ZOMG
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dudley, West Midlands
Posts: 2,473
![]() |
ECS made something decent
![]() Let me just breath here a little... ![]() 'doc |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If you want something for gaming then a 4000+ at stock performs the same as a 4.2GHz P4. And can you afford a 3.73EE? If you want it for workstation performance and general ultra-fast computing id definately go for it if i could afford it. But then you dont get dual core support, but you do get the potential of extremely fast single core use.
__________________
Last edited by Bindibadgi; 11th May 2005 at 11:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hypermodder
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 810
![]() |
6 SATA Ports?
__________________
AMD 64 X2 3800+ 1GB Corsair XMS ASRock Dual SATAII BFG 6600GT SoundBlaster Audigy! SE |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 from ICH6R and 2 from SIS180.
The Asus Intel boards for 955X have 8 SATA2 now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Brett Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
Posts: 3,906
![]() |
Bindi, why would a workstation want just one core? Many major workstation apps have a support for multithread. Single core is more for gaming nowadays, it seems.
__________________
"Frankly that seems overkill. iluvtrees2 arguing with spec is the intellectual equivalent of a bunny rabbit taking on a pissed-off lion." - Nexxo |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, yes and no. Depends on the application and the intensity of multithreaded/multitasking. A workstation can mean a variety of things. There are still many applications that are single threaded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Brett Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
Posts: 3,906
![]() |
Fair enough. I guess I'm just used to the idea of workstations being for graphics or CAD or databases and whatnot. Most programs for that now have multithread capabilities.
And 8 SATA2 ports is mad crazy. Would build a hell of a raid array, though!
__________________
"Frankly that seems overkill. iluvtrees2 arguing with spec is the intellectual equivalent of a bunny rabbit taking on a pissed-off lion." - Nexxo |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
![]() |
If you use all 400 gig drives you would have 3.2 terabytes in a raid array, what on earth would you do with that?
__________________
Sexy Black - a Lian Li case mod |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Brett Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
Posts: 3,906
![]() |
Store lots and lots of DVDs?
And really it would depend on the raid array how much of that space was useable. It could quickly get cut down to only 800gb worth of actual storage if you did a 2x 0+1 array.
__________________
"Frankly that seems overkill. iluvtrees2 arguing with spec is the intellectual equivalent of a bunny rabbit taking on a pissed-off lion." - Nexxo |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Lazy Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 'States
Posts: 4,529
![]() |
The fact that this board overclocks like a bat out of hell on the stock Intel heatsink is a surprise in and of itself; the fact that it has been made by ECS makes this astounding. Perhaps we will be seeing ECS make a rise like that of DFI did in the past. I just hope that they get better aesthetic tastes
__________________
Technology Schmecnology |
|
|
|
| RotoSequence |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by RotoSequence |
|
|
#13 |
|
Supermodder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
![]() |
I think if they see more people buying their stuff they will probably take more care when it comes to aesthetics. So far they seem to be used a lot in systems sold at stores like Fry's and such. The comp my parents bought uses an ECS micro ATX board. None of these comps are built for enthusiasts who care about these types of things.
__________________
Sexy Black - a Lian Li case mod |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Whooolapoook
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stalking Orco
Posts: 1,117
![]() |
I just cannot see how this type of hardware will ever really be a "workstation".
Then again it depends on how you would define the term "workstation"! I would love know which companies would allocate funds for Dual Core based workstations. Such companies obviously exist but they are so specialised. This type of hardware just always seems to stay mainly at enthusiast level. It will become mainstream but not for a very long time. Most companies are running horribly out-dated hardware, and the cost of upgrading to Dual Core systems is just too great. Would be nice though! Oh sorry....Nice Review
__________________
0ptimizm :PC under review
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Supermodel
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California
Posts: 340
![]() |
don't be badmouthing ECS I own several of their mobos and they work fine, but still can't compete with my Asus boards.
__________________
Soy mas cabron que guapo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Richard Swinburne
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omnipwntent
Posts: 28,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
What's a Dremel?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 5
![]() |
i have have just bought the extreme PF21 mb.and am having trouble installing winXP on a sata drive,it detects ok in the bios and i have formatted it ntfs.i have tried to copy the drivers from the cd to floppy but when i pressF6 to load driver i keep getting error messages.i have tried using silicon_v10033 drivers and they get me to the choose which drive,but windows does not see any drives.this is driving me nuts.i need sis 180 sata drivers.any help would be gratefull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Pewlius Caesar
bit-tech Staff
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ascot, Berks
Posts: 18,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
have you tried using the Intel ICH6R-powered SATA ports? It should install on those ports without the need for a driver.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
The other Brett.
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Lothian , Scotland
Posts: 9,664
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Don't know why everyone is surprised about ECS making a good board, yes they have never catered for overclockers/enthusiast before, but they have always made decent cheap stable mobo's.
__________________
The Rt. Hon. Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson - "Ping Pong is coming home" www.yodasarmpit.com clickr my flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
What's a Dremel?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 5
![]() |
Hi bigz
i have tried useing the 4 intel ports,but it does not show the drive when i startup.is there something in the bios that i need to change |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|