1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Motors The Official Bit-Tech F1 2009 Thread

Discussion in 'General' started by GreatOldOne, 18 Nov 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BentAnat

    BentAnat Software Dev

    Joined:
    26 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    219
    Them quitting doesn't necessarily indicate guilt, mind.
    Even them pleading no contest doesn't
    it just means that they don't want to take the possible repercussions. If my estimation is right (and it probably isn't as i have been proven wrong more than often enough), this would be a war full fo circumstantial BS.
    For the good of the team and for the sake of a quick and hopefully less painful resolution, Flav and Pat left, ING Renault goes "Ok... fine...".
    Watch them appeal immediately if the FIA decides they are banned... take back their no-contest, and shoot back trying to break Piquet family.

    I see the Flav/at move as more of a Ron Dennis move.
     
  2. ou7blaze

    ou7blaze sensational.

    Joined:
    5 May 2003
    Posts:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well I don't know what the hell's going on with Formula 1 these days and all this match fixing business. The Mclaren "spy-gate" scandal and now this Renault match fixing, it's quite distracting.

    I'm finding it hard to continue watching Formula 1, i'll never stop watching the first sport I took a liking to but this and the average races are changing my thoughts on this sport pretty quickly. I'm pretty sure there's much more race fixing going on than we know, my guess is it probably has something to do with in team betting. At the end of the day money makes the world go round.

    Whatever happens I just hope Button doesn't lose his potential title.
     
  3. Da_Rude_Baboon

    Da_Rude_Baboon What the?

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    135
    I would seriously doubt renault would get banned as what would the implications be for formula renault? They should get a serious fine though.

    Would this be considered a worse offence than the McLaren spying affair?
     
  4. smc8788

    smc8788 Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,974
    Likes Received:
    272
    Could they not just ban Briatore and Symonds if they were the ones responsible?
     
  5. aradreth

    aradreth What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    20 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    390
    Likes Received:
    61
    It should be as crashing intentionally puts people at risk of injury, spying doesn't.
     
  6. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    From the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/8261004.stm

    Eddie is off his ****ing rocker. Cheating is cheating and it makes ANY sport no longer a sport. What was left of F1 as a sport however, considering we know Ferrari are paid off more than others to stay in F1 etc
     
  7. sesterfield

    sesterfield What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    30 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    516
    Likes Received:
    12
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78682

    and a clever driver would not purposely cause a crash in order to bring out the safety car. The guy is an absolute joke :duh:
     
  8. RTT

    RTT #parp

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    14,120
    Likes Received:
    74
    Alonso knew about all of this too. Well it wouldn't surprise me, anyway.
     
  9. GreatOldOne

    GreatOldOne Wannabe Martian

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    12,092
    Likes Received:
    112
  10. mikeuk2004

    mikeuk2004 What you Looking at Fool!

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    11
    Thats what you get for race FIXING

    What if you had a bet on a different driver to win and the race was fixed and you lost money??? I wonder if people can get cash back from bookies.

    Edit, Piquet gets off becuase of his imunity for helping the investigation, Pat gets 5 year ban and Flavio gets a life time bad.
     
    Last edited: 21 Sep 2009
  11. oddball walking

    oddball walking ...!

    Joined:
    21 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    906
    Likes Received:
    4
    They got waht they desirve IMO.

    Will they be changeing the results from that race? or would the be no point.
    Will they come back after the 2 years im not sure I would.
     
  12. GreatOldOne

    GreatOldOne Wannabe Martian

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    12,092
    Likes Received:
    112
  13. mikeuk2004

    mikeuk2004 What you Looking at Fool!

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    11
    Flavio is banned indefinatley including his dirvers, which puts Mark Webber in the s**t because flavio manages him.

    Now Mark has to find a way out of his contract to distance himself from Flavio.
     
  14. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    Webber and Hamilton.

    Part of me thinks this is also Bernie and Mosley getting their own back a little on Flav's FOTA antics and wanting Max's place on the council.

    Woooow. Good strong result for the sport tbh.
     
  15. GreatOldOne

    GreatOldOne Wannabe Martian

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    12,092
    Likes Received:
    112
    The drivers are not being banned:

    (My emphasis)

    So the drivers under his managment are not being banned - they just need to leave his management team so that they can renew their supelicense when it expires.

    Since when has Lewis been managed by Flav? He's with his Dad....

    I know Flav manages Mark Webber, Fernando Alonso - who else?
     
  16. 13eightyfour

    13eightyfour Formerly Titanium Angel

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    3,454
    Likes Received:
    142
    I think Heikki Kovalainens under his management aswell
     
  17. GreatOldOne

    GreatOldOne Wannabe Martian

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    12,092
    Likes Received:
    112
    I really don't think that the punishment handed to the team goes far enough.

    It is tantamount to slapping their wrists. Because you plead guilty (which is what Renault basically did by not contesting the allegations), should the punishment be any less?

    A fine in the same order as McLarens spygate punishment plus points deducted would have been more fitting IMHO.

    It'd be interesting to see how much Renault have "given" the FIA saftey programme, and wether the protestations of Renault engine customers (who where scared of Renault been kicked out altogether, leaving them up **** creak without a piston) swayed the council.
     
  18. Combinho

    Combinho Ten kinds of awesome

    Joined:
    5 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    110
    I think that harsher action should have been taken against the teams. As GOO said, the same punishment as the McLaren's would have been in order, as well as the suspended ban.
     
  19. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,929
    Likes Received:
    657
    Sounds like a pretty decent result to me. There should've been some points docked I s'pose, but it sounds like the right people (except for Piquet) got what they deserved.

    Having said that, Piquet won't get a seat at any respectable racing team in the world now - after playing the key part in a dangerous and ridiculous thing like this.
     
  20. BentAnat

    BentAnat Software Dev

    Joined:
    26 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    219
    I am happy with this result.
    The punishment on Flav is merciless, like it should be. Dunno what Symmonds said or did to the FIA to get away lighter (or the ways in which the FIA deems him responsible)... but i think the deal sounds fair.
    Renault still racing is good news.
    As for new management teams for Hamilton and Webber - they're good drivers. I'm sure anyone would take them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page