1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Graphics 8800GTX good for Bad Company 2?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by keir, 15 May 2010.

  1. keir

    keir S p i t F i r e

    Joined:
    5 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,380
    Likes Received:
    49
    As the title says is a 8800GTX good for Bad Company 2?

    My current rig is getting battered by it, so I'm thinking and upgrade from a AMD 64 4800+ x2 with 2gig DDR400 to a overclocked i5 750 with 4gig DDR3 1600 should do the trick.

    Wanting to run everything on max smooth, 1920x1200
     
  2. Ph4ZeD

    Ph4ZeD What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    143
    8800 GTX will simply not cut the mustard anymore. Your asking a card that years old to run a cutting edge game at a very high resolution at maximu
    settings. Just to let you know - I had to upgrade from a single 260 GTX to SLI 260s to run Bad Company 2 at maximum settings smoothly at 1680x1050.
     
  3. Gunsmith

    Gunsmith Maximum Win

    Joined:
    23 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    Ignore him, the GTX is a fantastic card and will play modern games well because of the 360 holding everything back, the problem is the BC2 engine is a steaming pile of ****.
     
  4. Ph4ZeD

    Ph4ZeD What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    143
    Well he asked about BC2, and you've just said that BC2 engine requires a lot of horsepower, so I don't get why your being rude and telling him to "ignore" me when you've basically just agreed with me?
     
  5. Gunsmith

    Gunsmith Maximum Win

    Joined:
    23 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    2,362
    you said it was cutting edge :hehe:
     
  6. Xonar

    Xonar What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    676
    Likes Received:
    33
    It won't run smoothly with everything on max, as long as you've got a fairly decent quad core you should be able to run it smoothly with a mix of low/medium settings and no AA with an 8800GTX
     
  7. smc8788

    smc8788 Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,974
    Likes Received:
    272
    The GTX was a fantastic card. I mean, you wouldn't exactly say a lower-mid range card like the 5770 was fantastic these days, even though it's faster than an 8800GTX.

    I get anywhere from 60-90 FPS on medium (which still looks pretty good IMO) @ 1680*1050 with a GTX 275. Saying that, it's certainly a very CPU intensive game, so I'd say you've done the right thing by upgrading to a newer platform.

    You're not going to be able to max it at native res, but you should be able to get decent results with the quality settings and resolution knocked down a few notches.
     
  8. Krazeh

    Krazeh Minimodder

    Joined:
    12 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    2,124
    Likes Received:
    56
    I run BC2 perfectly well on a 8800GTX and a Q6600. Running at 1680*1050, I have level of detail, shadow quality, effects quality and texture quality set to medium, AA set to 4x MSAA and anisotrophic filter set to 4x. You don't need to run everything at high, it looks just as good at medium.
     
  9. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Mmmm biscuits

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,616
    Likes Received:
    197
    I have the feeling its not the 8800GTX slowing you down, but the old school 939 Athlon and 2Gb of ram.

    The 8800GTX should be fine if the CPU and memory are upgraded
     
  10. skreenname

    skreenname SFF Forever

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    334
    Likes Received:
    10
    I run Bad Company 2 on nigh max settings at 1600x900 and I usually get about 35FPS average.

    [​IMG]

    System in my signature.
     
  11. Bagpuss_Nam

    Bagpuss_Nam What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    8 May 2009
    Posts:
    46
    Likes Received:
    1
    I run that smooth at 1680 x 1050 on 8800GTX. But then there are 2 of them. Even without SLi it seems OK but I'm running it on a quad core Q9650 with 8GB RAM.

    The Game does pretty much max out all 4 cores when I'm playing it so as above I think its CPU intensive.

    I dont think a skt 939 would be up to it regardless of GC.

    Perhaps when the CPU/Mobo etc is upgraded the 8800GTX may be OK,
     
  12. docodine

    docodine killed a guy once

    Joined:
    10 Feb 2007
    Posts:
    5,084
    Likes Received:
    160
    +1 what Burnout21 says
     
  13. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    11,994
    Likes Received:
    714
    ouch, i would have imagined you can play on high with a gtx275. have you tried Dx9 mode instead of Dx10? also, turn off HBAO, heard that's a performance killer.

    try Dx9, medium, no AA with 8800GTX at 1920x1200. should be fine.
     
  14. Frohicky1

    Frohicky1 Awaits his moosey fate . . .

    Joined:
    16 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    9
    I disagree, I think it's really good. Not perfect, but well worth the purchase.
     
  15. smc8788

    smc8788 Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,974
    Likes Received:
    272
    I can play on high, it just means an average FPS of around 50 vs. ~70 on medium. The reason I keep it on medium is because I like to have a high framerate in multiplayer games and I can't really tell much difference between medium and high. For example, compare these sets of images - one image in each is of all medium settings, the other all high. All other settings are the same (HBAO off, 2x MSAA, 4x AF).

    1.

    http://i44.tinypic.com/k3uqgg.jpg
    http://i42.tinypic.com/16iuop5.jpg

    2.

    http://i39.tinypic.com/2qittab.jpg
    http://i44.tinypic.com/11havs4.jpg

    Can you really tell the difference, and would you be able to in-game? I can't honestly say I do, so I'd rather take the extra FPS over being able to say I can run it at max settings.
     
  16. keir

    keir S p i t F i r e

    Joined:
    5 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,380
    Likes Received:
    49
    Game plays smooth everything on high @ 1920x1200 in single player, but online is unplayable.
    I have to lower all the settings to get more FPS. :(

    So I'd say it's CPU.
     
  17. TheBlackSwordsMan

    TheBlackSwordsMan Over the Hills and Far Away

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    4,102
    Likes Received:
    534
    8800gtx = 9800gtx = gts250

    Live I run BF2 with a 9800gtx
    and one of my friend run it with his Amd 1090t 6 core and a 9600gt lollll The Processor realy help the card for this particular game. So I think you'll be allright with your card.
     
  18. aLtikal

    aLtikal 1338-One step infront of the pro's

    Joined:
    7 May 2008
    Posts:
    944
    Likes Received:
    30
    haha im running BC2 on a x1950 XT 256mb...but everything is on low and playing on 1024x768 res haha.

    Good FPS but res sucks!!!
     
  19. mars-bar-man

    mars-bar-man Side bewb.

    Joined:
    17 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    7,356
    Likes Received:
    276
    GTX260, and mostly on high settings at 1680x1050 roughly 40FPS. So I reckon the 8800GTX will cut it. Just.

    Don't expect miricles though.
     
  20. isaac12345

    isaac12345 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    20 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    427
    Likes Received:
    3
    The Frostbite engine is terribly CPU dependent. Your CPU upgrade should give you a good boost in BC2 and other games as well.
     

Share This Page