1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Build Advice Velociraptor or SSD?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by jeff1155, 20 Jul 2011.

  1. jeff1155

    jeff1155 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    19 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not as crazy as it sounds!

    I run my FlightSimX installation with a load of scenery off a 200Gb partition on my HDD - the idea is that keeping it alone and away from all the other stuff keeps that portion of the disk less fragged up - trouble is, I've just run out of space. I could just increase the partition size, but I've been toying with the idea of using a separate HDD for FSX anyway, and started thinking whether a 10,000RPM 300GB Velociraptor would be worth it?

    However, if I'm spending upto ~£100, is there a reasonbly sized SSD that I should be considering? I'm still stuck with SATAII, I just wondered whether there might be some older SSDs around for a (relative) song?

    Failing that, what's the fastest 250GB-ish read speed for less than £100?
     
  2. thetrashcanman

    thetrashcanman Angel headed hipsters

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    76
    I'd just get a newish, Sata 3 drive crucial M4 64Gb (or the new corsair drives also look pretty good) for example, stick your OS, flight sim and a few other of your most commonly used programs on it, and then at least when you upgrade to to a board with sata 3 you'll be able to utilize it, until then you'll still get a noticeable speed increase over a stand alone mechanical drive even on sata 2 :)
     
  3. jeff1155

    jeff1155 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    19 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    My FSX installation needs around 250GB, so 64GB ain't no good.

    Can you get anything on 64GB? Windows7 alone will fit, but while a lot of the applications you install can be shoved off to a large, cheap, storage drive, a lot can't. Isn't 64GB a bit limiting?
     
  4. PocketDemon

    PocketDemon Modder

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    2,107
    Likes Received:
    139
    Yeah, a 60/64GB HDD might be fine for a pretend computer (laptop/netbook thing), but as you need to leave ~25% free space (& that's without considering increasing the OP) then it'd be really limiting.

    So it's a complete non-starter as SSDs just aren't that cheap - if you had ~£450 then you might be starting to get near to the kind of necessary budget.


    Now the big question is how are the FSX scenary files read? - simply that 'if' they're highly sequential then you're likely to get basically as good results from sticking a ~300GB partition at the beginning of a 1TB Samsung F3 for a fraction of the cost...

    if that's workable, you 'could' then look at getting a ~60/64/80GB SSD for your OS & a few apps with the rest of the money which will speed things up more generally, but that's another idea that's separate from your original question.
     
  5. thetrashcanman

    thetrashcanman Angel headed hipsters

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    76
    Ah crap, well that rules an SSD out of the equation, windows 7 fits easy peasy on a 64Gb SSD

    I have it on mine, plus a lot of programs for benchmarking etc and i still have 76 Gb free, but yeah I'm fresh out of idea's, I think the smaller capacity raptor drives aren't worth the money, only the 600Gb version is even remotely fast enough, but i think its about £160. Get a samsung f3 1tb perhaps? other than that I'm fresh out of idea's, although i'm sure there plenty of other people that can help you :)

    thats insane though 250Gb? I have FS 2004, and i don't think it needs anything like that much space (hence why assumed a 64Gb drive would be sufficient) :)
     
  6. Guest-23315

    Guest-23315 Guest

    Single platter drive.. something like a 320Gb or the like.
     
  7. Bloody_Pete

    Bloody_Pete Technophile

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    1,092
    If you just get an SSD for windows and default program it'll speed things up. One thing that really will speed things up is having the page file on a SSD, as I was told in another thread, all software uses page file, even if you have 48GB of RAM, it'll still use page file (its restrictions built into the software, although if you have 48GB you can just make a RAM drive and whack the page file on that, but I digress). So basically, even if the software isn't on the SSD it'll still gain a boost from a SSD being in the system :)
     
    thetrashcanman likes this.
  8. Wicked_Sludge

    Wicked_Sludge My eyes! The goggles do nothing!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    80
    my install of FSX is only 13GB. even with a ton of add on scenery and aircraft i cant imagine it going over 100GB. what the hell did you DO?
     
  9. Ph4ZeD

    Ph4ZeD What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    143
    You don't actually think that Velociraptors and SSDs arein the league do you?
     
  10. jeff1155

    jeff1155 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    19 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    In the same league you mean? No, but if you're considering buying a premium 'performance' HDD you'd kick yourself if you didn't consider an SSD - as it is, even for SATAII it seems they're still too expensive. So, not in the same league, no!
     
  11. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    63
    I'm going to buy another 60gb ssd for my games I think as the speed difference is ludicrous.
     
  12. Bloody_Pete

    Bloody_Pete Technophile

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    1,092
    I run 2 80GB SSD's, one for OS and one for games. Installing games takes seconds, as does loading times, but FPS, ect, isn't effected.
     

Share This Page