Currently I have a overclocked ti 64 mb, but It doesn't cut the mustard anymore and I am looking to get either a Powercolor 9800pro or if I can afford it an Asus 9800pro XT. I score 11258 in 3dmark2001se atm so what kinda results can I expect with the new radeon in? A7N8X 2700+ 512 Corsair PC2700 7200rpm ATA-133 HDD Gef4 ti 64mb core = 285mhz, mem = 580mhz ta
WAit till tomorrow, im running a similar system and i killed my ti4200 128mb yesterday, i order a 9800pro earlier £161 with shipping. I used to get 13.3k 3dmarks link-->http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7624540 'doc
i would have thought more then that, but not much. i have heard of people saying they get 11k with a ti4200 and 18+k with a 9800pro was on here actually...hmm i will find 'doc EDIT: just noticed this isn't my thread lol, they your prob correct lol.
Don't go spending your money on a 9800XT, especially when pci express is right around the corner, you'd be a fool to buy a 9800xt right now!!
saphire 9800 pro 3dmark 2001 = 18k 3dmark 2003 = 5900+ brilliant cards the saphire but all i can say is dont go with power cool they dont seem to cut it when it comes to graphics cards that well!
What is the difference between "Sapphire ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Ultimate 128MB DDR TV-Out/DVI - Retail" and "Sapphire ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB DDR TV-Out/DVI - Lite Retail"? The price difference suggests alot... £154 for the Lite version £198 for the Ultimate version Anyone know the difference?
Same speed, i think the ultimate is passivly cooled i think annd comes with some crap games really not worth it. 'doc
So the "lite" is a "proper" 9800pro then? Its just missing the bundled software? Why I would want to pay £44 for Tomb Raider The Angel Of Darkness I don't know... Could buy it new for a lot less...
The early PCI-Express graphics cards aren't going to be a hell of a lot faster than the current AGP cards. More than likely there will be no difference. The lite version of the 9800pro retail pack contains no games or extras, just the card and a DVI/VGA convertor. Might have a tv-out cable too.
Would it be fair to say the Zalman cooled version would make temps considerably lower then the fan cooled? or is it not worth the extra cash.
It prob hotter is anything as its passivly cooled not active, only if you wan't a silent system, imo massive waste of money. 'doc