Both companies certainly do some things from time to time that aren't actually in the consumer's best interest. To some degree that's the nature...
+1
Nah, it's all good. We can have a difference of opinion and still get along and it's not my intent to start any kind of flame war or anything...
There's some more history to the whole physics debacle that is also interesting. NV started out on board with Havok very close to the same time...
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/archive/index.php/t-114856-p-6.html This was your response to the following question: This conversation...
You're correct on that. However the delivery was misleading IMO. It was all a mishmash of G80 vs. G92 and then which cards could and could not...
This was the statement that I was refering to specifically. Saying that AMD would do an about face concerning DX11 means to me that they don't...
Yay. I win. LOL
I should add that I own both AMD-based and NV-based cards. I have more than one PC and I typically buy whatever I felt like represented the best...
Are you saying that AMD GPUs won't run on some CPUs? One way to gauge it is how many titles run each solution. Havok has a significant lead...
PhysX is at best the number two player in this field. By recognizing Havok as the industry leader and going that direction INSTEAD of taking the...
I can only hope that it's true about AMD not supporting PhysX on principle. It would truly be refreshing to have a company have some principles....
Separate names with a comma.
