1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Intel Broadwell-K chips tipped to feature Iris Pro

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 21 Nov 2013.

  1. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,129
    Likes Received:
    6,717
    Gareth Halfacree, 21 Nov 2013
    #1
  2. barny2767

    barny2767 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    27 Sep 2011
    Posts:
    172
    Likes Received:
    8
    Always good to see Intel making things backwards compatible.

    Ho wait you still need a new Mobo to get a 9 series chipset.

    Anyone think Intel is ripping people off here.
     
    barny2767, 21 Nov 2013
    #2
  3. GiantKiwi

    GiantKiwi What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    427
    Likes Received:
    6
    They have no decent competition in the consumer market, so they are able to pull any shenanigans they like now.
     
    GiantKiwi, 21 Nov 2013
    #3
  4. edzieba

    edzieba Virtual Realist

    Joined:
    14 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    3,909
    Likes Received:
    591
    This seems ass-backwards. Integrated graphics is great for i3 and i5 builds where you can get away without a discrete GPU (e.g. media-centre, basic office Pc, etc), but if you're plumping for a higher-end CPU you'll likely be buying a discrete GPU too making that integrated GPU just a waste of die space (and money).
     
    edzieba, 21 Nov 2013
    #4
  5. rollo

    rollo Modder

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    131
    Iris is expensive.
     
    rollo, 21 Nov 2013
    #5
  6. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,129
    Likes Received:
    6,717
    Not at all. Remember that the gaming market isn't Intel's core demographic. Intel's Iris Pro IGP includes features like Quick Sync, designed to speed up video rendering - meaning that someone doing video-heavy work could easily not bother with a discrete graphics card in their system, saving cash, power draw, heat, noise and space. Even for 3D work, Iris Pro is good enough - especially if you're not rendering directly on the workstation but instead shipping the work out to a renderfarm, or if you're doing ray-tracing with something like one of Imagine's Caustic render cards.

    Sure, a gamer will always pair a Core i7 with a discrete GPU or six - but gamers aren't the whole, or even the majority, market.
     
    Gareth Halfacree, 21 Nov 2013
    #6
  7. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    You speak such blaspheme :eeek: :waah:
    Quick grab the pitchforks :D
     
    Corky42, 21 Nov 2013
    #7
  8. r3loaded

    r3loaded Minimodder

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    31
    They're going to be the few who'll actually overclock their chips though. Anyone doing workstation stuff as you've mentioned wouldn't dare using a chip beyond its spec if it's time/business critical work they're doing. Hence there's no reason to have it on a K-series chip.
     
    r3loaded, 21 Nov 2013
    #8
  9. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,129
    Likes Received:
    6,717
    Unless they're buying pre-overclocked workstations, which aren't exactly uncommon. Add to that, I know several businesses that mildly overclock their workstations as standard as a means of getting more bang for their buck.
     
    Gareth Halfacree, 21 Nov 2013
    #9
  10. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    388
    While i agree gamers are probably the few who will OC the chip, the K series is likely to come some 6 months or more after the standard chips. Overclocking and gamers are an after thought to their main market, the cost of totally redesigning a chip would be out of the question.
     
    Corky42, 21 Nov 2013
    #10
  11. ZeDestructor

    ZeDestructor Minimodder

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    4
    As much as people are talking about the eDRAM being used for IGP, you're all missing one cool point: we now have a 128MiB block of fast L4 cache, well, faster than RAM, slower than L3 and lower, as is the case with cache levels.

    I for one am looking forward to programmers fitting core gameplay entirely into the cache and leaving the RAM out to be used for large resources, like textures and whatnot.
     
    ZeDestructor, 21 Nov 2013
    #11
  12. Chicken76

    Chicken76 Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    952
    Likes Received:
    32
    Are the variants with less L3 cache only the Iris Pro variants, or all the chips in the (what I assume will be named the 5000) -series will have less cache than their 4000-series equivalents?
     
    Chicken76, 22 Nov 2013
    #12
  13. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,129
    Likes Received:
    6,717
    No idea, and Intel ain't saying. Guess we'll be waiting for a more detailed leak, or Intel's official announcement next year, to find out.
     
    Gareth Halfacree, 22 Nov 2013
    #13
  14. ZeDestructor

    ZeDestructor Minimodder

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    4
    If it's like Intel's current Haswell SKUs, you'll get a minor loss of L3 in exchange for a much larger L4/eDRAM block. ( http://ark.intel.com/compare/75131,76088,76642,75122 )

    EDIT: of course, being K-seires, we may well see full cache allocations...
     
    ZeDestructor, 22 Nov 2013
    #14
Tags: Edit

Share This Page