1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

3D printer 'gun parts' found in Manchester raid

Discussion in 'Serious' started by Teelzebub, 25 Oct 2013.

  1. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
  2. Shirty

    Shirty W*nker! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    18 Apr 1982
    Posts:
    12,583
    Likes Received:
    1,766
    I suspect in most cases these things are far more dangerous for the shooter than the target.

    There's a reason that firearms have been made of metal since forever...
     
  3. Modsbywoz

    Modsbywoz Multimodder

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    2,771
    Likes Received:
    264
    Guns don't kill people, printers do.
     
  4. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
    I imagine they would use plastic bullets as well, Interesting thought though
     
  5. jinq-sea

    jinq-sea 'write that down in your copy book' Super Moderator

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,723
    Likes Received:
    637


    In all seriousness, it's not good. But - as Shirty rightly says, it's more likely to damage the operator than the target!
     
  6. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
  7. Archtronics

    Archtronics Minimodder

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    2,556
    Likes Received:
    62
    I dare say bullets are just as hard to come by in the UK as guns are. Chances are if they can get the bullets they have access to firearms anyway.

    Also there's nothing stopping someone making a crude gun, crossbow etc without a 3D printer
     
  8. Risky

    Risky Modder

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2001
    Posts:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    113
  9. Porkins' Wingman

    Porkins' Wingman Can't touch this

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    129
    I'm not sure why these 3D printer stories are getting such prominence. 3D printing is being heralded as the most significant development since 2D printing, so maybe it's just the industry pushing these stories to the top of the agenda for publicity.

    If someone was using them to produce some never-before-conceived killing devices then it might be interesting, but guns have been around a long time, they're regulated, and these plastic ones are likely to be less effective anyways. So where's the beef?
     
  10. Shirty

    Shirty W*nker! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    18 Apr 1982
    Posts:
    12,583
    Likes Received:
    1,766
    Because people get bored of reading about actual, metal gun killings in our inner cities and sink estates, so a hyped up story about a non-problem becomes front page news.
     
  11. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
    Anyway you can get a real gun a lot cheaper than a 3D printer
     
  12. skunkmunkey

    skunkmunkey Minimodder

    Joined:
    15 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    521
    Likes Received:
    13
    The reason is actually that metals cannot be easily disposed of, guns need to have traceability, for that they have serials. If you had a plastic gun its easy to remove the serial or dispose of the weapon whereas metal is much harder to modify or dispose of. There are some non metal materials and plastics that are as strong (or almost) as the steel used today.

    In fact you can burn a 3d printed gun and all you would have left is a firing pin (Or nail) hence why the authorities are cacking themselves...
     
  13. Unicorn

    Unicorn Uniform November India

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    12,726
    Likes Received:
    456
    We've been over this so many times in other threads... People need to wise up and stop trying to print guns from polymer because the simple fact is that they won't be reliable. They all fire at best 1 or 2 shots, then self destruct.

    The investigating Detective Inspector is quoted to have said;

    "If what we have seized is proven to be viable components capable of constructing a genuine firearm, then it demonstrates that organised crime groups are acquiring technology that can be bought on the high street to produce the next generation of weapons."

    ...but the fact is it's extremely unlikely that any crime gang are going to be capable of successfully printing a viable firearm. If 3D printing experts all over the world have been unsuccessful so far, it's unlikely that some amateurs in their garage are going to get it right and produce something which fires straight, fires more than one round and doesn't kill the shooter in the process. I think they still need to be more concerned about the acquisition and activation of replica firearms which criminals have been doing for years.
     
    Last edited: 25 Oct 2013
  14. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
  15. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    13,796
    Likes Received:
    2,177
    In Australia they were worried about the potential dangers of 3d printed guns... so they made some... Then showed the results of their test...

     
  16. Guinevere

    Guinevere Mega Mom

    Joined:
    8 May 2010
    Posts:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    176
    Shock! 3D Printers can be used to print parts for other 3D printers.

    Double shock: 3D Printer parts cannot be used to fire bullets.

    Treble shock: Manchester police are muppets.


    Even though they know the parts have nothing to do with guns they are still saying:

    The 'Gun part' they found:

    [​IMG]

    Extruder Part of 3D Printer

    [​IMG]

    The 'Gun magazine' they found (Ignoring the small detail that the liberator 3D printable gun is single shot without a magazine):

    [​IMG]

    Filament holder for 3D Printer:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: 25 Oct 2013
    lm_wfc likes this.
  17. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197
    this bugs the crap out of me big time.

    Ok, so a few are developing designs of firearms in order to use the technology of 3D printer.
    Now using the FDM technology is just full of fail, plus their not compensating for the "head space" required for the round. With an alloy breech you can have a super tight head space that sends most the gases down the barrel allowing for high velocity rounds. With a polymer breech you need to increase the headspace to de-stress the breech upon firing, this reduces the potential velocity of the round. And this isn't taking into account the weaknesses of the FDM build process.

    Alloy breech = High pressure
    Polymer breech = Low pressure

    It would be a big enough challenge to get a working polymer gun using machining techniques, or SLS Nylon discounting the fact that firing of the round super heats the breech expanding and deforming the polymer. Hell POM would struggle, or TEEK.

    Glock know all of this, hence why ceramic composites are used, and if you're seriously wanting an illegal firearm, buy a hobbyist lathe, spend a few weekends learning and then convert a 8mm blank firer or a de-activated firearm. Even cut and shuts are possible to re-machine with a little time.

    So too those who are trying to make weapons with 3D printers, please stop because you're going to make the life of industrial designers/engineers a lot harder if such devices get banned. I really want a desktop SLS machine, sadly they don't really exist just yet but in time I can only hope!

    /RANT from an Industrial Designer.
     
  18. KidMod-Southpaw

    KidMod-Southpaw Super Spamming Saiyan

    Joined:
    28 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    12,592
    Likes Received:
    558
    This is why we can't have nice things isn't it?
     
  19. Teelzebub

    Teelzebub Up yours GOD,Whats best served cold

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    15,796
    Likes Received:
    4,484
    Tbh the argument that something should be banned because it could and indeed will be used by a few to hurt or kill someone is stupid, I could kill a person just as easily with a pencil or any number of every day items should we ban pencils then?
     
  20. jinq-sea

    jinq-sea 'write that down in your copy book' Super Moderator

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,723
    Likes Received:
    637
    This. In general. I can take a metal pen on an aeroplane, which I could use to blind somebody or really hurt them. Of course, I wouldn't ever do that, but I'm always amazed when ladies can't take tweezers or metal nail files on, but I swan through with my nice Cross pen in my bag.

    Daft.
     

Share This Page