1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News AMD/ATI merger gets government approval

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Da Dego, 7 Sep 2006.

  1. Da Dego

    Da Dego Brett Thomas

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2004
    Posts:
    3,913
    Likes Received:
    1
  2. yahooadam

    yahooadam <span style="color:#f00;font-weight:bold">Ultra cs

    Joined:
    21 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    1,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    i thought this had been finalised ?

    guess not then ..... anyway, their 2 different markets joining together, I'm not sure why they would have been blocked
     
  3. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    Governments can often say no to mergers of companies this large yahooadam, they have to agree to the things in order to make sure that monopolies don't end up in place(in theory, MS not being broken up proves it doesn't always work).
     
  4. Rekarp

    Rekarp What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    7 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats wrong with MS? Its not like they own all the manufacturing processes in making computers, they just make the most perfered OS in the world. Now a monopoly would occur if lets say Intel and AMD merged into one company or Nvidia and ATi merged. Its not like you "have" to use Windows XP. Theres OSx and linux options. So please dont label Microsoft as a monopoly.
     
  5. glnsize

    glnsize What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    If monopoly laws weren't in effect. Sun, Apple, and AMD would have been put to rest long ago. That’s the funny part to me... Apple isn't Microsoft’s competition. Apples existence enables Microsoft’s dominance.

    Nowhere in the law does it say one company can't have total dominance over a market. All it says is there must be competition. Intel and NVIDIA are still out there so there is no reason to block the merger...
     
  6. Tyinsar

    Tyinsar 6 screens 1 card since Nov 17 2007

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    2,287
    Likes Received:
    28
    [OT]
    No, but for quite a while they made it pretty much impossible to buy any other OS on a complete computer from any major manufacture. They effectively squashed other OS's through monopolistic practices.
    [/OT]

    I'm actually looking forward to see what AMD does with ATI.
     
  7. Rich_13

    Rich_13 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2003
    Posts:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    lets not forget the smaller players like via in these markets (xgi are still around right?) etc. .. :worried:
     
  8. speedfreek

    speedfreek What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    9 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    1
    Actually Via makes what intel makes, just not as much (chipsets, cpus, and gfx). I dont quite understand why AMD bought ATI but it could have something to do with the core 2 performance and they want to diversify.
     
  9. Marquee

    Marquee Mac Pro Modder

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    559
    Likes Received:
    3
    As a Canadian I am happy to give ATi to the US for about $10CD which is about $8 US. I hope AMD does something to ATi to fix the issues that people have with customer serives. I hope to see some great motherboard that come out that enable AMD CPU's and ATi mother boards and GPU's to work better together.
     
  10. EQC

    EQC What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Man...I heard that. I had a horrible many-month long experience with the only ATI product I've ever bought. Their customer service reps were actually reasonable...although they never could solve my problem (which many others had). The real problem was that they started selling the hardware before the software was ready, the software update process took about 2 hours, and many of their subsequent software revisions added new problems while failing to reduce the old ones.



    On a different note, the discussion on "monopolies" needs to remember that there are 2 basic types of monopolies: vertical, and horizontal. A horizontal monopoly is where one company owns every manufacturer of one product (ie: one company is responsible for every CPU made). A vertical monopoly is where one company owns every step of producing something (ie: perhaps if Intel owned silicon mines, silicon refineries, chip fabs, retail outlets, etc...they might be considered a vertical monopoly). I'm not really sure if vertical monopolies are frowned upon in the same way as horizontal ones since they're less of a threat to competition...but it's not much of a stretch to say a company (AMD/ATI) that produces CPU's, GPU's, chipsets, etc is approaching vertical monopoly strength.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page