1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News AMD Bulldozer chip allegedly benchmarked

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by arcticstoat, 6 Jul 2011.

  1. arcticstoat

    arcticstoat New Member

    Joined:
    19 May 2004
    Posts:
    916
    Likes Received:
    13
    Last edited: 6 Jul 2011
  2. Woollster00

    Woollster00 New Member

    Joined:
    24 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you be tempted by an AMD FX system with this level of performance? Does the Bulldozer architecture have any hope of competing with Intel's Sandy Bridge and LGA2011 processors?

    No and No.
     
  3. stoff3r

    stoff3r New Member

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    This level of performance... Oh well, If it's cheap and cheerful then.

    BTW when's LGA2011 coming out? In time for Battlefield 3?
     
  4. MrJay

    MrJay You are always where you want to be

    Joined:
    20 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    36
    So what have we lernt from this article,
    We have an unidentified chip, running on beta drivers from a Czech site whos credability is unknown.

    Think im gonna get more info befor selling my AMD shares : )
     
  5. confusis

    confusis Kiwi-modder

    Joined:
    5 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    2,406
    Likes Received:
    63
    Wow - not even 2% in it and people are writing off bulldozer on PRE-PRODUCTION parts? idiots, seriously. Wait until the retail parts hit the shelves before making a judgement folks.
     
  6. GeorgeStorm

    GeorgeStorm Aggressive PC Builder

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    5,978
    Likes Received:
    220
    As above really, wait until more testing has been done.
    And tbh, if it comes in at £200, then near 990x performance for that isn't DREADFUL now is it.
    We know so few details, waaay too much speculation.
     
  7. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,588
    Likes Received:
    231
    as soon as i read quad-SLi, i have written off any credibility in these benchmarks.

    use a single GPU to remove any unoptimised drivers. multi-GPU technology rely HEAVILY on drivers, and at end of the day, drivers are just lower level x86 code running on CPU. so optimised driver for CPU architecture can make quite a bit of difference.

    also, 990x isn't exactly flagship when compared single-thread gaming performance of sandy bridges.
     
  8. noizdaemon666

    noizdaemon666 I'm Od, Therefore I Pwn

    Joined:
    15 Jun 2010
    Posts:
    5,562
    Likes Received:
    472
    I'm interested to know how he got 4-way SLi to work, given that a slide earlier on in the article says the chipset only does 2 or 3 way SLi. Also, why no EFI BIOS? Surely this should be a must have on a top end chipset?
     
    Last edited: 6 Jul 2011
  9. r3loaded

    r3loaded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    31
    They're using SLI, their argument is invalid. You've got to wonder - are they testing CPUs or GPUs here?
     
  10. TheUn4seen

    TheUn4seen New Member

    Joined:
    22 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    68
    Likes Received:
    2
    Damn, that's one huge socket.

    As for the article - I want Bulldozer to be earth-shattering, but I don't expect it to be. Actually, I think it will be like Phenoms, first gen will be a complete disappointment, second will be better but still poor. So, for the second time in many years I just bought an Intel CPU (2600k). Now, how about that Zotac Z68-ITX review you promised? I need a worthy replacement for my insane little H55N-USB3.
     
  11. Technobod

    Technobod Finally bought a desktop :D

    Joined:
    28 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    259
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ok then, lets be really generous and say that a production part has 15% better performance than a pre-production sample.. fair? ok, that still makes this 'top of the range' and overclocked chip slower than an 1156 OC'd setup.

    But agreeably and SLi setup is not the correct way to assess a chips performance.
     
  12. Christopher N. Lew

    Christopher N. Lew Folding in memory of my father

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,347
    Likes Received:
    44
    Just games tested? Nothing to test the power of 8 cores over 6? Pre production model, and it still overclocks to 4GHz? I draw no conclusions at all, other than waiting for a proper review.
     
  13. Jaybles

    Jaybles New Member

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    981
    Likes Received:
    54
    SLI is new on AMD CPUs and Boards is it not? This also seems an odd way of testing the system.

    Both systems were overclocked to 4Ghz...
    Maybe this chip can be overclocked above SandyB levels easily and thats where its true performance lies.
    I think a better test would be to overclock each chip as far as possible and then run a proper set of CPU benchmarks.
     
  14. Action_Parsnip

    Action_Parsnip New Member

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    720
    Likes Received:
    40
    1) The chip is unreleased, as is its proper bios.

    2) SLI is flaky and underperforming on 990fx boards

    Does everest stil report the L2 and L3 caches as disabled on this sample? Like all the other benchmarked engineering samples we have seen?

    HMMMM YES WELL I DUNNO MAYBE WE SHOULD RESERVE JUDGEMENT THEN EH
     
    Last edited: 6 Jul 2011
  15. SlowMotionSuicide

    SlowMotionSuicide Come Hell or High Water

    Joined:
    16 May 2009
    Posts:
    835
    Likes Received:
    20
    So Bulldozer can almost match the performance of Intel's CPU architecture from 2008? Sounds great, where I can sign up?

    I bet they're lolling their asses off at Intel.
     
  16. Boogle

    Boogle New Member

    Joined:
    8 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    282
    Likes Received:
    6
    So the i7-990X has 6 cores and costs £800 on it's lonesome. The FX is likely to be a lot cheaper, and doesn't require a super-expensive motherboard, and has an additional 2 cores. Quite frankly if the FX CPU is as cheap as it should be, I can't see a problem at all.

    OK AMD aren't beating Intel outright. However, the AMD Radeon series seem to be selling well despite not being faster than NV's fastest.
     
  17. Hakuren

    Hakuren New Member

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    While I didn't expected Bulldozer to beat Intel X58 platform at all; Benchmarks of CPU with GPUs oriented/heavy setup is completely pointless. True power of CPU is tested when you using good old PCI VGA. Why do you think best OC board on the market (Gigabyte X58-OC) is equipped with 1 PCI slot? Because it is required when you want to see how CPU really performs (and with extreme OC - LN2 it is a must). All stuff which potentially clogs up PCI-Express has to go if you running serious benching session in search of true CPU performance. One of many reasons why good old PCI shouldn't die.
     
  18. fingerbob69

    fingerbob69 Member

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    801
    Likes Received:
    16
    Just to clarify: within 2% of the 990x performance for over £400 less. Wow.
     
  19. BlackRaven

    BlackRaven Freaking printers!

    Joined:
    20 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
  20. SexyHyde

    SexyHyde Member

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    605
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well at least it ain't a proper turkey. Now we just have to wait for proper chips, proper tests and a price mark. I think with all the slating bulldozer is getting, a few people might be pleasantly surprised.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page