1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News ARM adds virtualisation to Cortex A

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 25 Aug 2010.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. yuusou

    yuusou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    1,975
    Likes Received:
    266
    Competition is always good. I say bring it on ARM.
     
  3. SouperAndy

    SouperAndy To Bumble or not to Bumble?

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    147
    Likes Received:
    9
    Agree ^

    RISC is definitely better for certain situations, where full bloodied x86 is just not necessary.

    I think that specialist architectures should continue to be investigated and ARM is making a good start.... Who said that a database server, web server, file server, ERP system, etc. All require the same CPU instruction set? Surely there must be optimised designs?!

    Dunno what ever happened to the RISC push, ~15 years ago it was seen as a real revolution (Acorn Archimedes, etc), but it just died away...

    Cheers,

    SouperAndy :worried:
     
  4. B1GBUD

    B1GBUD ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Accidentally Funny

    Joined:
    29 May 2008
    Posts:
    3,308
    Likes Received:
    410
    Didn't Sun Microsystems try to revive it with their Ultra SPARC's?
     
  5. eddtox

    eddtox Homo Interneticus

    Joined:
    7 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    15
    AFAIK, Microsoft isn't that huge in the server market (is that right?), and linux is known to work well on arm processors, so maybe things will work out.
     
  6. SouperAndy

    SouperAndy To Bumble or not to Bumble?

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    147
    Likes Received:
    9
    Yep - I used a Sun system in my previous job ~5 years ago and used a PowerPC based supercomputer to run simulations... But you wouldn't call them 'mainstream' or even enterprise in any real sense.

    Any large (non-IT) corporation that is currently looking at a server farm / datacentre will be AMD / Intel x86 all the way.

    It seems that at the moment, everything upto specialised applications (HPC, etc) will get x86 by default.

    Cheers,

    SouperAndy :worried:
     
  7. crazyceo

    crazyceo New Member

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    563
    Likes Received:
    8
    Don't believe everything posted here from the Linux brigade. Microsoft does just fine in the world market and IS the major player they all look to.

    Just read the waffle that follows this now and you will understand my post.
     
  8. general22

    general22 New Member

    Joined:
    26 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    190
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't really see ARM gaining any kind of significant server market share until it there is a 64bit ARM instruction set.
     
  9. Spuzzell

    Spuzzell New Member

    Joined:
    11 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    91
    Likes Received:
    3
    Go ARM!

    Didn't you run a story last month about how ARM were looking to completely remove themselves from manufacture and just sell licenses to their IPs? Not sure how that would affect any push to usurp Intel or AMD.

    Anywho, hard to care when my shares are heading up like they're made of helium :)
     
  10. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    101
    If by "The major player they all look to" you mean 1% of market share in Server OS, then yes.

    Honestly I wonder if this isn't actually bad news for AMD. If ARM becomes a real competitor to Intel it's going to be taking more business away from AMD than anyone else.
     
  11. SlickGnome

    SlickGnome New Member

    Joined:
    2 Feb 2007
    Posts:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is a little skewed as the linked article is talking about Linux vs Windows in an HPC environment of the top 500 Super Computers. I would guess (and probably be fairly accurate) that Linux vs Windows in the Majority of Non Super Computer datacenters (typical business) actually run a fairly even mix, not to say that Linux isn't higher percentage than Windows (the one I run is almost 50/50), but I don't have the numbers to check in front of me. I suppose I could check Gartner to find out their stats for the average data center, but eh.
     
  12. Elledan

    Elledan New Member

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    948
    Likes Received:
    34
    I'm looking forward to running ARM in a future desktop/server system :) I can't wait to see how these little beasts perform. If they also add support for PCIe and other common interfaces in x86 land, I can't see how people could not want to use them with a server system. Unless the mainboards are really expensive or so.

    On a sidenote, it's important to realize that the entire ARM business including ARM Inc itself and licensees dwarfs Intel by a few orders of magnitude. If ARM does something, you bet Intel is paying attention.
     
  13. crazyceo

    crazyceo New Member

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    563
    Likes Received:
    8
    You should really read what you link to. The only people pushing Linux are linux fanbois, the business world is run on Microsoft Server based OS. The top 500 supercomputers in the world are specific to its needs and not to the small companies with 1 server and 10 desktop pcs.
     
  14. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag New Member

    Joined:
    30 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    10
    uh.... no.

    even mac has its place in the server world. small companies that can't afford the time to find someone skilled with linux will use windows for their servers, and companies that rely only windows-only software will go for windows servers, but windows is a horrible os to use for a server. its bloated, incredibly limiting (to mainly cpu architectures and customization), NTFS is slow as hell compared to ext4 (especially on SSDs), and most of all, windows is not stable enough. also, you ALWAYS have to pay a price for windows whereas linux can be free.
     
  15. Elledan

    Elledan New Member

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    948
    Likes Received:
    34
    Right. And I assume you have proof for all these claims?

    Also, everybody knows that BSD > Linux when it comes to server tasks, if only because Linux is an insecure pile of remote exploits :D
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page