1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Assange accuses Facebook of being a US spying tool

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by arcticstoat, 3 May 2011.

  1. arcticstoat

    arcticstoat New Member

    Joined:
    19 May 2004
    Posts:
    916
    Likes Received:
    13
  2. Unknownsock

    Unknownsock New Member

    Joined:
    13 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    444
    Likes Received:
    1
    oh god i hate this guy.

    I honestly couldn't care if the US goverment collected info on what pr0n i watch.
     
  3. Mitcian

    Mitcian New Member

    Joined:
    30 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    129
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'm rather torn here between giving a crap what Assange has to say in his latest jibe at 'The Man', and being slightly concerned as I don't see it a huge stretch of the imagination that his accusations may have some truth to them.
     
  4. WarrenJ

    WarrenJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    2,694
    Likes Received:
    202
    Guessing he "liked" prostitutes then.
     
  5. Mechh69

    Mechh69 I think we can make that fit

    Joined:
    16 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,298
    Likes Received:
    59
    WOW I think he's needs a tin foil hat. I guess he thinks all companies that have a HQ in the U.S. or do business in the U.S. just give all their information to the U.S. government? Like the government cares that "Little Genny fell down and bumped her knee" or that someone's cat had 3 kittens vice 4. I seriously doubt any government has time or the equipment to mine that amount of data for the little they would glean from facebook.
     
  6. Furymouse

    Furymouse Like connect 4 in dagger terms

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    22
    Wait a second, Facebook has personal information on it that other people can see? I'm being Facebook stalked by the gub'mint?
     
  7. banks1990

    banks1990 New Member

    Joined:
    23 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    4
    Likes Received:
    1
    ah yes, facebook, google and yahoo are operated by Shadow Broker.
    and US government is currently the highest bidder.
     
    Fizzban likes this.
  8. Tangster

    Tangster Butt-kicking for goodness!

    Joined:
    23 May 2009
    Posts:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    150
    We have dismissed these claims.
     
  9. jrs77

    jrs77 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    103
    I'm telling people for years allready, that all these so called social playtforms are huge databases collecting informations taht can be accessed by national intelligence services.

    Oh, and I don't use any of these services ofc. I'm only using anonymous ways to communicate with other people, like private IRC or teamspeak-servers. Any service where there's friendlists being stored on central servers is a no-go. Hiding IP's by using tools like TOR etc is also being done here.

    The only thing that's being tracked and I can't do without unfortunately is my mobile-phone (simple $50 phone, no smart-crap).

    Yes. I'm paranoid :worried:
     
  10. feathers

    feathers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    59
    In this world the most unthinkable is the most probable.
     
  11. WarrenJ

    WarrenJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    2,694
    Likes Received:
    202
    Does it really matter. Unless you have something to hide what's the government going to do?
     
  12. Toploaded

    Toploaded New Member

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    6
    The ironic thing is, the more you try and duck out the system like that, the more you will stand out and get noticed. by da man ;)
     
  13. Fizzban

    Fizzban Man of Many Typos

    Joined:
    10 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    3,325
    Likes Received:
    116
    Even if it is true it doesn't really matter does it. They are only going to want info on terror suspects or murders/pedos ect.. So in other words it wouldn't affect 99.9 % of us. The likelihood is that it is just a lie though.
     
  14. tad2008

    tad2008 New Member

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2008
    Posts:
    332
    Likes Received:
    3
    +! :eek:)
     
  15. mucgoo

    mucgoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    9 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,602
    Likes Received:
    41
    would anyone here really complain if the US government used facebook/other online data in tracking down a murder/rapist etc.
     
  16. fodder

    fodder Member

    Joined:
    20 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    162
    Likes Received:
    3
    Erm, has he ever seen the posts and conversations on facebook?

    Unless they have a scheme for covert sterilisation to preserve some form of intelligence in the human race, I would doubt the effort would be worth the reward.
     
  17. FelixTech

    FelixTech Robot

    Joined:
    12 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    357
    Likes Received:
    8
    The same argument can be applied to the government installing cameras in your house, or GPS trackers in your body.

    Legal processes like subpoenas and warrants exist for a reason - to protect individuals' privacy in all but exceptional cases. You should be able to assume your privacy is being upheld unless you are notified otherwise.

    Information is a powerful thing, and while it won't necessarily be misused there is no need to make it a possibility. Storing unhashed passwords is perfectly harmless - right up until someone hacks your database.
     
  18. jrs77

    jrs77 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    103
    Using these sites in certain cases isn't the problem. The problem is, that all the data is allways freely available for them... everyones data, no matter if you're a suspect or not.

    For me the question is this: "Is it acceptable that everyones data is being constantly observed, just to catch a few bad people?"

    My answer to this question is: "NO!, it's not acceptable."

    Furthermore it's not acceptable that all the data (IP-adresses, chatlogs, priv messages, etc) is being stored for more then a very few month (6 month being the absolute maximum that's acceptable!).

    If there's a suspect, then the governement sure has all the rights to track all the communications, but aslong as I'm not a suspect, there shouldn't be tracked anything, don't even talk about stored/recorded permanently.

    The freedom and anonymity of the unguilty masses simply weighs in so much more then the posibility to catch a few bad guilty ones imho.
     
  19. MiNiMaL_FuSS

    MiNiMaL_FuSS ƬӇЄƦЄ ƁЄ ƇƠƜƧ ӇЄƦЄ.

    Joined:
    24 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    6,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    it's not a matter of 'what have you got to hide?'

    it's a matter of 'what reason have you got to look?'

    If we went with the, it dosnt matter as long as you have nothing to hide option, then you wouldn't object if a goverment offcial turned up on your doorstep and just felt like a rummage through your house?
     
  20. Sloth

    Sloth #yolo #swag

    Joined:
    29 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    5,634
    Likes Received:
    208
    Unless he's got some real proof I'm going to go ahead and say that his fame and power has gone to his head. He says they're giving information away, they say they're not and neither one has a solid way of proving they're right. It comes down to whose word people will believe. I believe that Mr. Assange knows this and is using it to have people buy into his words without proof. Being suspicious goes both ways.

    A fair deal of the trivial information found on a Facebook user's information section has already been gathered by the government through driver's licenses, voter registration, taxes, etc. I've already willingly given up far more information than will be found on Facebook or any online account when applying for a background check as well. The only useful information which Facebook may provide would be incriminating pictures or status updates which would only be of any relevance if the person in question was actually suspected of anything in which case a subpoena isn't exactly hard to get so why setup such an illegitimate channel?
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page