Athlon 64...

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by riggs, 25 Nov 2002.

  1. riggs

    riggs ^_^

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    3
    Just a few quick questions (ZapWizard...you there?)

    Anyone have any idea what speeds (Ghz) will be available at launch of this new chip?
    When running the CPU in 32-bit mode (to allow backwards compatibility), what kind of speed are we gonna get? A little faster than the current XP2800's, or a LOT?

    Just wondered as I plan on getting one as soon as they're released...just not sure about it - depends on the 32-bit performance as it's gonna take a while before 64-bit applications are being released by the bucket load...

    Oh, just another quick question about resisters (don't want to start a new thread in 'Electronics' - I ain't no sp4mm0r :p
    I'm trying to run 2 60mm fans at half speed (or, 7v), to cool a PSU - what kind of resistor would I need to take the speed down? Woud it work running off the fan header on the PSU?

    Cheers guys
     
  2. xen0morph

    xen0morph Bargain wine connoisseur

    Joined:
    30 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm no AMD expert but here goes...

    I believe they're launching at somewhere around 3 Ghz but I don't know this for certain.

    A lot (depending on clock speed). Obviously a higher clock makes for a faster chip, 32-bit or not. The Athlon 64 dosen't perform physically any faster in 64-bit mode, it can just move more data at one time. So the higher clock speed will apply - like an existing AMD32 chip at a higher speed.

    AMD wouldn't make a chip that only performs well in 64-bit mode (although the Athlon64 IS intended for server applications in part). It will perform well while running Legacy-32 applications, although obviously better in 64-bit mode.

    The normal procedure is to connect between 12v and 5v lines to get 7v. Try here if you can't find a 5v line...

    </bull>

    Sorry if that didn't make sense :D
     
  3. riggs

    riggs ^_^

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    3
    cheers for that info :D

    I knew the 32bit speed would be faster, just wasn't sure how much, and if it was worth getting, or just get a fast XP...

    I'm not really with it when it comes to electronics, so I just need a resistor value so I can pop down to Maplins...
    ...also, there is no 5v line on the PSU fan header...it would mean routing the fan cable through the case of the PSU to a header on the mobo....thanks anyway.
     
  4. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    Actually it will be released about 2GHz, core improvements and on die memory controller bringing in the biggest improvements in terms of speed. It will be given a Quantispeed rating (cough!) or 3400+ (hmm), not sure if a 2GHz Athlon 64 can match or equal a 3400MHz Pentium 4 Northwood on an 800MHz bus, but I guess the benchmarks will tell, ;) Mind you the 64 bit mode will also bring some performance improvements, UT2K3 runs 15% faster when compiled for 64bit.

    Athlon 64 != Barton, which will launch at 3GHz or more.
     
  5. 8-BALL

    8-BALL Theory would dictate.....

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'm not sure that a 3400+ should be directy compared to the 3.4GHz P4.

    The PR rating was "defined" for the athlon XP as the speed required on a thunderbird core to achieve the same performance.

    eg

    XP 1800+ should have the same performance as a thunderbird core at 1.8GHz.

    Hope this helps
     
  6. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    It didn't entirely hold though, ;) Its not to hard to see that AMD can't keep up in the clock speed race so it had to do something to match Intel in the numbers stake. I mean they could call their 2800+ a 3200+, but it would be rollocks, at least 2800 is believable, :)
     
  7. IsaacSibson

    IsaacSibson Banned

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, from early results a 2GHz Clawhammer should easily best a 3.4GHz P4. Earliest indicators with 800MHz samples had them quicker than 1.6GHz P4s.

    The answer is wait and see though.

    Theoretically, there's also no reason that you can't use a 64-bit register or execution unit to hold or execute 2 32bit instructions at once. Hyperthreading? How about two REAL CPUs in one?

    Possibilities are endless....
     

Share This Page