1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Bethesda sues Interplay over Fallout trademark

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 14 Sep 2009.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. DragunovHUN

    DragunovHUN I want to change my name but I also don't

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2008
    Posts:
    5,144
    Likes Received:
    181
    DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH THOSE, BETHESDA! I'M WARNING YOU!
     
  3. Bauul

    Bauul Sir Bongaminge

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,173
    Likes Received:
    38
    I can understand Beth's complaint. Interplay don't own the rights to Fallout anymore, they can't go releasing new packages without consulting Beth first. It'd be like me selling you my car, and then going dirving it off without your permission.
     
  4. Zurechial

    Zurechial Elitist

    Joined:
    21 Mar 2007
    Posts:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    99
    ******s. Jump in a vat, Bethesda.
     
  5. Cousteau

    Cousteau New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree with Bauul on this... Interplay sold the rights to Bethesda, therefore Bethesda are the rightful owners to distribute said licenses, no Interplay. Sure, Interplay may have made the games and still own the core code etc, but Bethesda own ALL rights to licensing and distribution of the old games - it's Interplay trying to gain some revenue back and therefore should have made a new deal with Bethesda before plying off their wares to steam etc knowing full well it was jumping on the bandwagon over Bethesda's own release of Fallout 3...

    it's Interplay's own fault for not seeking permission first...

    and to ply another comparison, it's like you being a music artist, selling your music to a record label who then own the full distribution and licensing rights (with royalties paid to the original artist) and then the original artist trying to flog the same album(s) on CDs distributed by themselves and not the record label they signed over to
     
  6. DragunovHUN

    DragunovHUN I want to change my name but I also don't

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2008
    Posts:
    5,144
    Likes Received:
    181
    ^Yeah yeah whatever, that is obviously the case but that's not the point that matters.

    The point is that Bethesda could, and most likely will end up pulling these packages and that means no more Fallout because THEY sure as hell don't want to re-release any of the old games.

    I don't know about you guys but i'm off to get the NoDRM version from GOG while i still can.
     
  7. salesman

    salesman New Member

    Joined:
    29 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    234
    Likes Received:
    3
    I really don't believe that is going to happen. Although I am not Bethesda neither do I work in the business, but this is fallout and I imagine some way or another it will find it's way into the hands of those wanting to play it.
     
  8. DragunovHUN

    DragunovHUN I want to change my name but I also don't

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2008
    Posts:
    5,144
    Likes Received:
    181
    If Bethesda cared for the old Fallout games, they would have released that bundle long ago. I think they're quite happy with just selling their own Fallout 3 expansion packs.
     
  9. Paradigm Shifter

    Paradigm Shifter de nihilo nihil fit

    Joined:
    10 May 2006
    Posts:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    37
    Yeah. However, Interplay were selling "The Fallout Collection" long before Bethesda bought the rights. I can see why Bethsoft would get in such a tizzy about a 'Fallout Trilogy' though.
     
  10. Kiytan

    Kiytan Shiny

    Joined:
    2 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    971
    Likes Received:
    23
    I have to side with bethesda on this one, It's really not very clever of interplay to go publishing things they don't have the right to anymore. I'm sure some type of deal could have been brokered with bethesda.

    Calling it a trilogy as well is very misleading. Overall not a very good move on interplays part
     
  11. Red 5

    Red 5 New Member

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    683
    Likes Received:
    39
    Oh man, so true! I can't tell you how confused I was by the titling of Alien Cubed. Why cubed? It seemed to have little or no continuity from Alien either, almost as if there was something missing in between, but I've checked everywhere and there definitely isn't an Alien 2.

    :rolleyes:
     
  12. Cabe6403

    Cabe6403 Supreme Commander

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    43
    It seems to me that this is Bethesda trying to take 100% control of the Fallout brand. At the moment it seems that interplay still hold a chunk of it, and Bethesda want that chunk.
     
  13. SMIFFYDUDE

    SMIFFYDUDE Supermodders on my D

    Joined:
    22 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    103
    Why do all the metaphors and similes used on this forum always involve cars or the car industry
     
  14. eternum

    eternum *blam* shotgun fanhole

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    82
    Likes Received:
    4
    They DO have complete control of it - they BOUGHT it. The only chunk that Interplay has is very specific (MMO) and only allowed to them conditionally. Bethesda has every right to litigate this - it just isn't terribly kind to gamers if they pull the games. And it was completely stupid for Interplay to try to sell the games that they no longer own the license for. If they had sought approval from Bethesda like they were supposed to, I'd be willing to bet they'd have said yes in exchange for a cut of the profits.
     
  15. Red 5

    Red 5 New Member

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    683
    Likes Received:
    39
    Because most of us are men. There's typically only two options, or at least two that spring immediately to mind.

    See?
     
  16. Byron C

    Byron C *psst!* This guy is a loser!

    Joined:
    12 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    5,463
    Likes Received:
    636
    I think there's a little bit of misty-eyed nostalgia going on when it comes to Fallout - there are many, many die-hard Fallout fans who believe that Bethesda ruined the franchise, and thus do not want Bethesda's greasy mitts all over the original games. As already stated however, Bethesda now owns Fallout - Interplay were only licensed for the MMO - so Interplay can't go re-releasing or re-packaging the older games. It's simply not theirs any more.

    I loved the original Fallout games, but I also think that Bethesda did a good job with Fallout 3. They did take away a lot of the appeal and charm of the older games (such as the black humour), but they have made a great game. FO3 feels much more bleak and barren, more like a post-apocalyptic wasteland. When you have to wander round the wastes for days to reach locations it's so much more immersive; you can see all the ruined cities & buildings in the distance, watch the landscape roll by... hopping in the car and watching a dot move round a map feels much more disconnected. (Granted it's only made possible with the better technology that we now have).

    I think that, if it had been left to Interplay, they would have had another Duke Nukem Forever on their hands. They would have nurtured their baby endlessly, caring more about how to keep the next game true to the originals than actually getting a good game out the door.
     
    Last edited: 15 Sep 2009
  17. xaser04

    xaser04 Ba Ba Ba BANANA!

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    103
    Excellent post.
     
  18. Byron C

    Byron C *psst!* This guy is a loser!

    Joined:
    12 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    5,463
    Likes Received:
    636
    Thank you - I aim to please...

    Although I just noticed that I wrote Duke Nukem 3D, when I meant Duke Nukem Forever.... Ooops! :D
     
  19. xaser04

    xaser04 Ba Ba Ba BANANA!

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    103
    Strangely I knew what you meant. Although it has been a long day (only lunch time!) and I have an afternoon of complex FX Swap modeling to work through....... YAY ........
     
  20. cjmUK

    cjmUK Old git.

    Joined:
    9 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    2,550
    Likes Received:
    84
    We're so used to stories of big publishers chasing every dime and screwing customers, employees and competitors when the whim takes them.... but I'm with Bethesda on this one.

    They bought the brand, so they choose its direction. They aren't going to be against Interplay making more money (though I don't think there will be much) out of the older games - providing a) it doesn't complicate Bethesda's FO3 program and b) they get a suitable (small) slice of this (small) pie.

    I don't blame interplay for wanting to cash in on the success of Bethesda's FO3, but rules is rules and they seem to have broke them.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page