Hardware Bigfoot Networks Killer 2100 Gaming Network Card Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Claave, 2 Sep 2010.

  1. Claave

    Claave You Rebel scum

    Joined:
    29 Nov 2008
    Posts:
    691
    Likes Received:
    12
  2. fingerbob69

    fingerbob69 Member

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    799
    Likes Received:
    16
    The biggest difference I've been able to make to my ping/upload/download Internet speed was to get one of those 'free'* wall socket replacements that take out the bell wire signal, from BT.

    It took my speed from a reported max of 1408 kbs (tragic I know) to a reported 2416 kbs ...an incredible 1008 kbs or 41.7% increase!

    If you haven't already I can't recommend this little upgrade enough.

    * 'free' = £1.20 for p&p on your next bill and just for clarity ordinarily I loath BT and have no working or paid connection with them other than my phone line and bill!
     
  3. xaser04

    xaser04 Ba Ba Ba BANANA!

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    1,876
    Likes Received:
    72
    Why did this receive a '6' for value?

    Given it provides no tangible benefit AND costs £68, I would have thought a 2 or 3 would have been more appropriate.
     
  4. Flibblebot

    Flibblebot Smile with me

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2005
    Posts:
    4,583
    Likes Received:
    129
    The trouble is that any system is only ever as fast as its slowest step - and in this situation, the local network card is far from the slowest step.

    The slowest step is always going to be the broadband connection (at least until they roll out 100Mbps fibre connections), and no amount of flashy network kit in your home will change that.

    This kind of product is targeted at people who don't know any better and really believe that 3/1000s of a second is the difference between winning and losing... :sigh:
     
  5. Jim

    Jim Ineptimodder

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    310
    Likes Received:
    7
    Is there anything interesting you can do with the CPU these days, or still very little?

    I know you could run a firewall on it at one point, but unless you run Norton 2007 or something I'm guessing your firewall isn't going to harm your gaming PC's performance.
     
  6. bogie170

    bogie170 New Member

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    340
    Likes Received:
    5
    Did you also try this card using TCP otimizer?
     
  7. elpresidente2075

    elpresidente2075 New Member

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any reason that the file transfers were only going at 11 MB/s? I've got a cheap rosewill switch and a pair of intel PCI-e nics and get 100-120 MB/s across my network. From your results, it looks like you've got something limiting your small network to 100 Mb/s, perhaps the lack of jumbo frames?

    For reference, a gigabit connection's maximum theoretical throughput should be about 128 MB/s, minus some for overhead, resulting in a real-world best case expectation of about 120 MB/s; a 100 Mb/s connection's maximum theoretical throughput is 12.8 MB/s, with real world expectation of 10-11MB/s. Also, don't forget to use 4-9k jumbo frames, as (much like the 4k sectors on WD's new drives vs 512b on regular) there's tremendous overhead with using 1.5k frames. In my experience, 1.5k frames will limit your network to a maximum of about 80-90 MB/s.
     
  8. maverik-sg1

    maverik-sg1 New Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    351
    Likes Received:
    1
    Testing in FPS Games is great - hows about testing World Of Warcraft/Starcraft 2 latencies, I don't know enough about networks to comment if these games are more or less demanding than an FPS, be interesting to see though.

    also there is a standard ping registry tweak:

    1. Open the registry editor by going start->run and typing "regedit" then pressing enter
    2. Nagivate to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\"
    3. Look in each of the keys inside that one (they look like: {random numbers and letters]) and determine which one is your network connection. You can tell this since it will have your computers local ip address stored in it.
    4. Add a new key called "TcpAckFrequency" of type REG_DWORD and set the value to 1.
    4b. If you are using windows 2000 call this new key "TcpDelAckTicks" and set it to 0 instead.
    5. Restart your computer.

    Only once you have an optimised system can you decide if the product is truly viable - although one would expect any assiciated drivers to do this for you.

    the very fact that you can do more than one thing sounds good - occasionally the family watch video's from my PC whilst I game online, this can be a problem - so if this product would resolve some of these issues - £68 starts to look appealing.
     
  9. vampalan

    vampalan New Member

    Joined:
    18 Jun 2003
    Posts:
    225
    Likes Received:
    1
    These gaming network cards historically had a lot of people complains about lack of driver support.
    A cheaper and probably better supported card would be an Intel server network card from eBay/somewhere else.
     
  10. Hakuren

    Hakuren New Member

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whoa, what a surprise. I read many reviews of that garbage and I did not expected nothing radical from bit-tech crew. But I'm surprised with such high score. 2 or 3/10 overall score is high enough IMHO.

    People singing during game of football "There is only one X Y!"
    I want to say only one thing: There is only one Intel!

    Any other NIC is garbage.
     
  11. billysielu

    billysielu New Member

    Joined:
    12 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    0/10 is more appropriate. costs money and does nothing.
     
  12. ashmud

    ashmud New Member

    Joined:
    18 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wouldn't a router with decent QoS be a better upgrade for downloading + gaming?
     
  13. leexgx

    leexgx CPC hang out zone (i Fix pcs i do )

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    8
    i have to agree who runs 100mb based networks to transfer files, ignoring that card is not worth the cost
     
  14. Tsung

    Tsung New Member

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2008
    Posts:
    97
    Likes Received:
    1
    Mmm I thought steam stopped background downloading when playing another steam game. So downloading a new Steam purchase whilst playing an older (steam) game would not be possible.
     
  15. yakyb

    yakyb i hate the person above me

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,063
    Likes Received:
    30
    yeah 11MB/s your doing something very wrong there unless there is a b B confusion going on
     
  16. yakyb

    yakyb i hate the person above me

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,063
    Likes Received:
    30
    oh and no Killer nic -> Killer Nic comparison
     
  17. schmidtbag

    schmidtbag New Member

    Joined:
    30 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    10
    i'm not sure why this company continues to make these cards. the idea is nice but networks aren't strenuous enough. think about it - if you had the money to buy this card, your computer probably has plenty of processing power left over for the network.

    if they really wanted to make a product to consider they'd make a UPU (usb processing unit). i'm not sure if usb controllers are technically their own processor but from what i've heard, i'm guessing they aren't. usb handles a LOT more information than a gaming NIC. but, i think the reason a UPU hasn't been done yet is because usb isn't really cpu demanding at all unless its software based, in which case a UPU wouldn't help anyway. i'm just throwing out ideas.

    i am aware that since sounblaster live!, soundcards now have their own processors. they aren't really heavy duty, but they don't need to be
     
  18. Bakes

    Bakes New Member

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2010
    Posts:
    886
    Likes Received:
    17
    Well, am I right in thinking that these devices perform MUCH better when there are huge numbers of players in (say) WoW or when you're downloading torrents while you game?
     
  19. Flibblebot

    Flibblebot Smile with me

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2005
    Posts:
    4,583
    Likes Received:
    129
    No, because the limiting factor will still be your broadband speed - the connection from you to your ISP is much, much slower than the connection from (say) Blizzard to your ISP. No amount of offloading the network stack onto a separate processor is ever going to solve crap ADSL speeds.
    Yes, this was demonstrated in the article, but only if you throttle the torrents back a long way.
     
  20. HourBeforeDawn

    HourBeforeDawn a.k.a KazeModz

    Joined:
    26 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    6
    seriously who falls for buying this??? and really a 6/10 for Value, given the results I would say its more like a 4/10
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page