I know a server change happened, I am not sure if it is just me, but it seems much much slower. Is the server change still going on so its slow, or has my PC just decided that it doesnt like bit tech so it will try and ruin my browsing. No other websites are slower for me, so I just assumed it was bit-tech.
Yeah actually it is very quick. I just found out my little brother is torrenting the theiving little git, though I think he is actually getting a linux distro of some sort so perhaps no theiving is involved at all. But most other sites seem to run normally, maybe he has bandwidth spikes just as I got onto bit tech
None of you should be experiencing any slowdown. It would be very helpful if anyone having problems could PM me with a traceroute.
Fast and smooth here at home. Before the server move there were some slow-downs and bounces ("server busy").
I'm on dial-up, so I can't tell the difference. But the site doesn't hiccup when loading content, for me.
Code: Tracing route to www.bit-tech.net [91.198.165.67] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 19 ms 1 ms 1 ms ar680w [192.168.1.1] 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 65 ms 47 ms 59 ms ge-1-3-ur01.bloomington.in.indiana.comcast.net [68.85.178.41] 4 20 ms 30 ms 67 ms 68.85.176.210 5 31 ms 45 ms 18 ms 68.85.177.14 6 83 ms 47 ms 86 ms 68.85.176.218 7 116 ms 16 ms 31 ms pos-0-11-0-0-ar01.indianapolis.in.indiana.comcast.net [68.86.90.170] 8 68 ms 41 ms 80 ms pos-0-7-0-0-cr01.nashville.tn.ibone.comcast.net[68.86.85.65] 9 54 ms 62 ms 50 ms COMCAST-IP.car1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.71.252.6] 10 98 ms 207 ms 209 ms te-3-2.car1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.71.252.5] 11 73 ms 55 ms 145 ms ae-27-52.car1.Atlanta4.Level3.net [4.68.103.44] 12 59 ms 43 ms 38 ms atl-bb1-link.telia.net [213.248.68.53] 13 54 ms 70 ms 68 ms ash-bb1-link.telia.net [213.248.80.141] 14 140 ms 169 ms 146 ms ldn-bb2-pos6-0-0.telia.net [213.248.65.209] 15 172 ms 131 ms 171 ms ldn-b1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.93] 16 162 ms 131 ms 150 ms ldn-tch-i1-link.telia.net [80.91.250.210] 17 142 ms 189 ms 142 ms 83.231.148.20 18 132 ms 124 ms 141 ms ge-9-2.the.uk.euroconnex.net [217.112.81.2] 19 130 ms 133 ms 171 ms ge-1-436.border2.core.misp.co.uk [195.72.130.245] 20 140 ms 203 ms 130 ms ge-1-377.captain.core.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.5] 21 158 ms 138 ms 142 ms bit-tech2.servers.rbl-mer.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.67] Trace complete. Not as good as the European guys but Comcast in Bloomington, IN sucks for any sever.
Code: C:\>pathping bit-tech.net Tracing route to bit-tech.net [91.198.165.67] over a maximum of 30 hops: 0 deunan [192.168.1.3] 1 192.168.1.11 2 cr0.sdwtrlv.uk.easynet.net [87.87.248.25] 3 80.238.59.225 4 be2.er10.thlon.ov.easynet.net [195.66.224.43] 5 ge2-24-0-cr0.thn.uk.as6908.net [195.66.225.32] 6 ge-1-436.border1.core.misp.co.uk [195.72.130.246] 7 ge-1-377.captain.core.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.5] 8 bit-tech2.servers.rbl-mer.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.67] Computing statistics for 200 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 0 localhost [0.0.0.0] 0/ 100 = 0% | 1 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 0.0.0.0 0/ 100 = 0% | 2 39ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ISP [0.0.0.0] 0/ 100 = 0% | 3 30ms 82/ 100 = 82% 82/ 100 = 82% 80.238.59.225 0/ 100 = 0% | 4 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% be2.er10.thlon.ov.easynet.net [195.66.224.43] 0/ 100 = 0% | 5 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% ge2-24-0-cr0.thn.uk.as6908.net [195.66.225.32] 0/ 100 = 0% | 6 40ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ge-1-436.border1.core.misp.co.uk [195.72.130.246] 0/ 100 = 0% | 7 41ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ge-1-377.captain.core.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.5] 0/ 100 = 0% | 8 40ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% bit-tech2.servers.rbl-mer.misp.co.uk [91.198.165.67] Trace complete. Looks ok to me too, I would say though that the top level page does seem to load a teeny bit faster as do most images though we are talking half seconds at best. However over the course of a whole page of images it's pretty noticeable ::edit:: What does worry me slightly though is that you only have one MX record :S
