1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Browzar accused of being adware

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Garside, 4 Sep 2006.

  1. Garside

    Garside New Member

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    403
    Likes Received:
    1
  2. rupbert

    rupbert New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    800
    Likes Received:
    0
    The name alone made me stay clear, they might well have just called it 'Teh BroWzAr'...
     
  3. Glider

    Glider /dev/null

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    4,173
    Likes Received:
    21
    Teh (3)1337 H4X0R Bro\/\/Z4r [that took me ages to type] would be more appropriate ;)

    But yeah, too obvious...
     
  4. olly_lewis

    olly_lewis New Member

    Joined:
    19 May 2006
    Posts:
    759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah the name was rubbish and looks like the product is rubbish to, I know, Firefox allows some degree of privacy and there is a market for privacy in a world where the MPAA and RIAA can see what you've downloaded illegally and nab you for it..
    The market for privacy is still open and perhaps they'll be more products like this, but of course, if they are all like this, then there's no point, is there...
    I just want to know what the next privacy browser app is called... how about 133t<bROwSEr OMG!>? I like it...
     
  5. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,129
    Likes Received:
    375
    another "browzar" for the trash bin.
     
  6. jjsyht

    jjsyht Hello, my name is yuri

    Joined:
    19 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its a pity you cant sue the developers for releasing crap like this.
     
  7. sunnyg

    sunnyg New Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    it sounds like something out of starwars, made by a college student.
     
  8. xrob

    xrob Member

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    that thing actually looks like it was designed by a 10y/o

    who the hell would even bother downloading it unless your a serial masterbater
     
  9. mclean007

    mclean007 Officious Bystander

    Joined:
    22 May 2003
    Posts:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    15
    It will take something a lot more than a supposed 'no traces' browser to keep the MPAA and RIAA off your back - for starters, generally when you download something illegally, you will store it somewhere, so that kind of negates the whole idea of leaving no traces on your machine. And that's even if this thing worked properly. The idea, patently, is to allow someone to look at...ahem...shall we say 'seedy' websites without being caught out by his wife / girlfriend / flatmate / kids looking at the internet history / temp internet files / IE dropdown / cookies list etc. Getting rid of those tracks is trivial stuff to you and me, but to Joe Average, maybe something like this is a good way for him to get his prawn fix without fear of being caught out.

    Of course it is just a shell for IE - it downloads in about 300KB or something - it obviously wasn't going to be a fully fledged browser. And lots of sites require cookies to work. I'm guessing Browzar must have some success in isolating the pages visited / form entries from IE's history, cache and autocomplete, otherwise it really would be totally pointless.

    If you want to steer clear of the MPAA and RIAA, you need to use something like an anonymising encrypted proxy (e.g. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/08/15/Swedish_politicians_offer_untraceable_internet/) or at the very least block RIAA / MPAA IP addresses using PeerGuardian.
     
  10. yahooadam

    yahooadam <span style="color:#f00;font-weight:bold">Ultra cs

    Joined:
    21 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    1,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    glad you posted this up as you posted on the browzar thread linking to that blog ;)

    good thing i never used it :p

    And apart from that, you can actually change all the thing in IE to be more secure then browzar anyway, and you don't need an extra shell for IE
     
  11. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    If they're in America, and do any sort of damages, you most definitely can. And probably can even if they did nothing more than annoy you.
     
  12. Glider

    Glider /dev/null

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    4,173
    Likes Received:
    21
  13. mclean007

    mclean007 Officious Bystander

    Joined:
    22 May 2003
    Posts:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    15
    (1) If you are using an encrypted channel to a proxy, your ISP will have nothing of use to the RIAA / MPAA.
    (2) They will only request your logs from the ISP if they have a suspicion that you are file sharing, and the way PeerGuardian works is by blocking their IP addresses, so you are 'invisible' to the RIAA etc.
    (3) They will only get a court order if they can demonstrate some reasonable grounds why they think it will lead to a conviction - see (2).
    (4) Any protection is better than none, and will reduce further the already slim chance of being caught.
    (5) That's assuming your ISP actually keeps logs of every site you visit. They don't have to do so, and probably don't, at least not for long - it would generate an enormous amount of generally useless data.

    However, you are correct insofar as the only way to be completely safe is not to do anything wrong in the first place, although it is still possible the RIAA (never ones to let the facts stand in the way of a good law suit) will file suit against you even if you don't have a PC.
     
  14. IronFire

    IronFire New Member

    Joined:
    10 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
  15. Lord_A

    Lord_A Boom baby!

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    3,539
    Likes Received:
    2
    What's wrong with just setting Firefox to 'Clear Private Data' on exit?

    Or just manually delete all files yourself? I don't get why people need a 'privacy' browser at all tbh, especially one called Browzar, ugh.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page