Storage Calling those who bought the Samsung 64GB 2.5" SSD or OCZ Agility SSD

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Guest-16, 4 Aug 2009.

  1. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

  2. trig

    trig god's little mistake

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    44
    quick question...
    haven't bought the ocz, but was looking at it compared to the g-skill falcon (both are the 64 gb version). here in the states there is about a $20 price difference in favor of the falcon. stats seem identical. any reason to look at the agility despite the $20 price increase?

    can't find the samsung anywhere in the states unless you buy it in a prebuilt.

    pqi has a nice option for 32 gb capacity for about $120...seemed to have better performance stats than the agility...

    sorry to derail your thread, i know you are looking for experiences. i have none yet, just curious on those issues.
     
  3. notatoad

    notatoad pretty fing wonderful

    Joined:
    25 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    3,213
    Likes Received:
    60
    i've got a vertex, which looks pretty much identical to the agility from the spec sheet. i'm quite happy with it so far, although i don't really have too much to compare it too. at the same time i got the SSD i also got a quad-core and switched from ext3 to ext4, so i'm not sure how much of my huge performance increase came from what.

    i certainly don't have any complaints.
     
  4. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197
    The samsung has caught my eye, but mainly because of its asthetics. £100 for 64Gb, i dont know would a pair of WD 640GB Black editions RAID 0 together be a cheaper option?
     
  5. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    The Samsung would be far more responsive.
     
  6. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197
    Really, bloody hell! i might just have to grab one when i can, first i need to get rid of my 32-bit OS bottleneck on this system.
     
  7. Xtrafresh

    Xtrafresh It never hurts to help

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    100
    i have the SLC-version of the samsung. Great drive, which really helped my little 12" AMD laptop stay on it's feet when i hammer it a little. Performance is not stellar though, there's not much difference in large file transfer speeds between this and a standard drive, though responsiveness is through the roof, and it provides the laptop with a decidedly more high-end experience.

    Oh, and i can totally attest to the looks of the thing, it's a stunning piece of hardware to behold :D
     
  8. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    Well typically SSDs have a zero response time, although I'm not sure if the £90 one above has cache to prevent stuttering.

    Two WDs in RAID will always have a seek and RAID overhead.
     
  9. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    11,299
    Likes Received:
    426
    i've got the Samsung 64GB. but i've put "Program Data" and "users" folder onto my WD Black, so in the end, the performance of launching Firefox was only a little bit faster than WD Raptor.

    but in GTA4, the textures sometime flashes due to driving to fast on WD Black, when installed in SSD, it flashes very quickly, barely noticeable
     
  10. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    The onboard cache should mean no stutter. Pity the controller chip is a bit lacking on bandwidth. I'd be very tempted to raid-0 a pair.

    Slightly OT, but I have a Corsair M64 which has higher bandwidth, but barely any cache. As I've used it and piled stuff on, it's not slowed down much, if at all. IE8 is open and ready within a second, as are most programs. Photoshop takes about four seconds to open.
     
  11. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    Is the M64 the same as the Samsung drive above?? Hmm. £134 is a nice price.

    EDIT: M64 is also Jmicron apparently.

    FAIL.
     
  12. Xtrafresh

    Xtrafresh It never hurts to help

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    100
    in other words: they use JMicron, but don't want to admit it. FAIL indeed :duh:
     
  13. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    I *think* they use the newer J-Micron controller - still a minimal amount of cache (something like 64Kb iirc), but I've not experienced stuttering. Certainly no indication of it on atto benchmark or such :)

    I've still got to crack mine open :naughty:

    linky
     
    Last edited: 5 Aug 2009
  14. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    Ahh is it the same one Kingston uses on its V-series? It's branded Toshiba and has 64k of cache on chip.
     
  15. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    Sausage. No idea.
     
  16. droitwichdosser

    droitwichdosser What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    113
    Likes Received:
    7
    quote from the novatech page for the samsung

    Features
    - Onboard 64MB Cache
    - Samsung Controller



    EDIT: would also point out that the agility is a bit cheaper from scan.co.uk
    http://www.scan.co.uk/Product.aspx?WebProductId=1053333

    although they quote Read:185 MB/s Write:100 MB/s

    the vertex is also cheaper
    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/30GB...TA-3Gb-s-200MB-s-Read-and-160MB-s-Write-speed

    and that quotes Read:230 MB/s Write:135 MB/s

    Out of the OCZ drives i know which my money would go on :)
     
    Last edited: 5 Aug 2009

Share This Page