1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Capturing a new audience

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 28 May 2005.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. hughwi

    hughwi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    1,584
    Likes Received:
    36
    Nice column there Wil,

    I like to do several things at once whilst at my computer, but i also want to get my moneysworth from my computer in games. I think dual core is the way forward, but it maybe a while before the enthusiast market are happy with what it can do.

    Cheers
     
  3. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    But comparitively how big is the enthusiast market compared to mainstream? As far as i can remember Intel have always catered to the mainstream with little effort for the enthusiasts unlike AMD, who, now are also going down the intel route a lot more. It ends up the motherboard manufacturers catering for everyone.
     
  4. Skutbag

    Skutbag New Member

    Joined:
    17 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    317
    Likes Received:
    6
    43% of the public dont have a computer?!?!?
    Wow. I knew there would be a fair few but almost 1 in 2 people? *stunned*

    I just hope we dont all end up with idiot proof bloatware at the loss of performance. Oh wait a minute, thats Windows XP! :naughty:
     
  5. cpemma

    cpemma Ecky thump

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    55
    Percentage-wise small, but in numbers world-wide a heck of a lot of people, and people who'll rush to pay over the odds for the latest thing. And they drag the mainstream behind in the slipstream. Bit like cars, always got to have a newer model in the wings.

    They used to say wars spurred technical development; now it's a popular game. :D
     
  6. Risky

    Risky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2001
    Posts:
    4,097
    Likes Received:
    36
    Having used dualies at work on and off over the years, I'd definitely tade a bit ot single-threaded peformance for the greater responsiveness of dual processing. Does 2.3Ghz 'suck' at games or is it just not as good as 3.8? Sure for someone that buy the latest chip to get max framerates then this chip isn't it. But for someone like me more likely to have a browser and mail and hell knows wwaht else runnign in the background, its definely the way forward.
     
  7. FIBRE+

    FIBRE+ Active Member

    Joined:
    27 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    11
    43%!!!! I guess thats for the whole population, including kids and people near death... rather than people who will actually use/buy the thing. Statistics for large numbers of things never really add up.

    One major thing is, how many people need/can buy there own computer?, most people share a computer or if there lucky loaned one from work.

    If there is a family of 5 people, on average you may have 1 computer for the whole household "family pc", and maybe a laptop for Dad/Mum or even a teenager with there own computer. Then theres the extreme case, the enthusiast/professional... obviously they will have there main pc, mabye a secoundary, a laptop, a pda, a media pc and even a server.

    Chances are the 44% are kids, elderly and people not so well off so this statement: "What Intel has realised is that extra performance does not matter to these people" is totally true. It would make more sense educating these people on how easy to use they are and why they need one. Maybe if Intel were to work with somone like Dell and the Government to have a special plan for these people, cheap computers for elderly/young/poor, a good way to make these people aware of there "need" for a computer is to offer free lessons in varios local places like librarys etc.

    Im kinda off topic amd probbably just talking crap but just thought id try and make a contribution... premptive apollogy :waah:

    Nice article tho :D
     
  8. RTT

    RTT #parp

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    14,120
    Likes Received:
    74
    43% may not have a computer BUT i'd bet over 90% have access to one
     
  9. cpemma

    cpemma Ecky thump

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    55
    Data from 2002 UK survey:
    54% of homes had a 'puter
    80% of 2-parent kids had home access, 70% online.
    But ~50% of 1-parent kids had home access, 36% on-line.

    But the UK figure is higher than many 1st-world countries (thanks to Sir Clive). :clap:

    Even so, Intel's data must be years out of date - I can't believe the 46% without in 2002 hasn't fallen more drastically than 3%. :confused:
     
    Last edited: 28 May 2005
  10. dom_

    dom_ --->

    Joined:
    4 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    8
    gotta agree with the mce05 comments.
    had it a month now, never going back.
    <3 microsoft and intel
    </fanboy>
     
  11. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    I'm looking to set up a media center comp, really tempted to use the OS. Anyone happen to know if an ATI remote wonder would work with it as the main remote or if I'd have to pick up the MS one or an equivalent? Got a RW spare and dont' feel like spending the ~$35 on the remote if I don't need to, not to mention the ATI RW is RF not IR = don't care about walls.

    Very interesting article... that figure was quite shocking to me as well. Intel is REALLY making a good move with the initial prices being so low compared to the AMD DC setups (although, the AMD X2's do look more powerful, a bit of googling shows that it's only $241 for the PD 820 vs over twice that for the X2 4200+). I can see these coming into Dells and whatnot very soon, since Intel is quite right when they acknowledge how people do NOT want to have that virus scan be anything more than a background process.

    So people don't "need" the extra performance of anything over a PII running Win98, but when background apps can actually run in the background and you don't notice them, it's great. With the P4 630 weighing in only $20 less than the 820, you've gotta think how good of a deal that is, since you're basically getting a second processor for $20 without the need for a special board (save a 945/955 chipset) or any of that other poo you tend to have to deal with on SMP systems.

    I was originally planning to use my old NF7S/2600+M setup for a media center, but these things are VERY tempting (except for the obvious fact I'd need to buy stuff). Still, I just found a cheap 945 Gigabyte board for $140, get a DC proc for $240, a 512mb stick of DDR2-667 for $80, grab a cheap tuner and it's still not too expensive for a pretty decent setup. I'm just hoping PCIE tuners are out soon... ATI should have the PCIE Theatre 550 part available by now...*evileye*
     
  12. Pezboy

    Pezboy New Member

    Joined:
    12 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm surprised no one has mentioned the DRM incorporated at the hardware level in this new processor. I'm interested in what Intel had to say about this at the conference, or if it was glossed over completely which is what I suspect. More info here .
     
  13. Da Dego

    Da Dego Brett Thomas

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2004
    Posts:
    3,913
    Likes Received:
    1
    Oh ****...

    I never saw THAT in the spec sheet...thanks, pezboy. Ladies and gentlemen, hold on to your hats, Big Brother is going to give us a ride.

    EDIT: Oh, and a second little undermentioned "feature"...anyone take a look at this IDE redirect? Hmmmm...how many idiots does it take to make a chip with a guranteed hacker exploit?

    Networking through the BIOS...BAD.
     
    Last edited: 1 Jun 2005
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page