CF Flash Memory Speeds

Discussion in 'Photography, Art & Design' started by scq, 28 Oct 2007.

  1. scq

    scq What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    879
    Likes Received:
    6
    I've found this great deal on an 8GB CF card. It's an 75x card by Transcend.

    Is 75x fast enough? I'm using a generic "brand-less" card I got off eBay (said to be 133x, but I've never really tested it). I was lucky that it was noticeably faster than the standard Sandisk cards (not ULTRA or Extreme, the blue-labeled ones), and other cards I borrowed off somebody. The biggest thing I've noticed is that a faster card really empties the burst-buffer significantly. Now that I have a 40D, it's increasingly more important that I have a card that can write quickly.

    Is 80x a decent speed? I know some pro-cards go up to 300x, but this 75x card is a really great deal.

    75x is around $90, and 266x is around $160 (Canadian dollars).
     
  2. BioSniper

    BioSniper Minimodder

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2002
    Posts:
    3,815
    Likes Received:
    18
    120x Cards are said to be around 21mbp/s

    So we can assume that 1x = 0.175 mbp/s
    multiply that by 75 and we get 13.125mbp/s

    Sandisk Extreme III's by comparison (which seem to be the current favourite for most bit-techers as the 2GB's are pretty cheap in the UK) supposedly have a minimum of 20mbp/s transfer and the Extreme IV does "up to 40mbp/s.
    Why nobody standardises their speeds I will never know.

    I would suggest that the card is perhaps a little slow, though unless you are doing lots of sequential shots you may never notice.
    Personally though I would always buy the best card I could afford even if its smaller than the cheaper equivalent just due to reliablility, that and smaller cards are often a good thing. Just imagine if you lost 8GB of data in one hit and it was your holiday/wedding photos. I'd always take a handful of 2GB's or a couple of 4GB's for that reason alone.

    Hopefully someone with a little more knowledge of CF transfer speeds can help me out here though.

    ::edit::

    According to wiki

    :)
     
  3. cosmic

    cosmic What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    381
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's a very nice price for an 8GByte card but its not very fast - a 40D should be able to benefit from a faster card. I find the main advantage of faster cards is when you want to preview images on the camera screen when lighting is difficult. Having to wait on a slow card is annoying.

    Best palce to check flash card performane is the robgalbraith site, not got a 40D in the database but figures for the 30D are there.
    http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-8478
     
  4. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    I think you'll be more than fine with that, unless you've got something like the 10FPS 1DsMkIII. The 40D is 6.5FPS I think, right? I shoot with a 50x card and have never found it being problematic for rapidfire shots, and though my 400D only does 3FPS, I think I can still take 15-20 RAW shots before it starts to slow down from a full buffer.

    From what I hear, often times the interface between the camera and the card is going to be the limiting factor, rather than the speed of the card itself.
     
  5. Jumeira_Johnny

    Jumeira_Johnny 16032 - High plains drifter

    Joined:
    13 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    3,708
    Likes Received:
    144
    I think with a 40D you are going to want a faster card.
     

Share This Page