News Chinese Man Gets Four Year Sentence

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by The_Pope, 21 Apr 2006.

  1. The_Pope

    The_Pope Geoff Richards Super Moderator

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    2,873
    Likes Received:
    109
  2. Confused Fishcake

    Confused Fishcake Minimodder

    Joined:
    25 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    698
    Likes Received:
    1
    That is wrong, people in China and other countries where freedom is limited should be helped to get free speech.
     
  3. Meanmotion

    Meanmotion bleh Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    1,652
    Likes Received:
    18
    They 'owe' it to there share holders to do whatever they can to make money! That's why they're giving in to china's demands. It's a f***ing disgrace! People are so narrow minded.
     
  4. Kaze22

    Kaze22 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    419
    Likes Received:
    0
    Honestly nobody is forcing them into China's market. I could understand if China solicited these companies to enter into China's market and was then given restrictions.
    The fact of the matter is these restrictions have always been there Sohu, China's biggest search engine has always had to abide by these rules. And you know what China was doing just fine with Sohu for many years, so explain to me again why China should bend their political agendas to better a suit a foreign market influence.
    You cannot enter another country and expect the government to treat you with kid gloves. What did Americans expect? Is China suppose to bow down before the might of the western super power and change all their laws in regards to internet control just so a few Joe Blows can feel better about themselves as they sit behind their PS2 half a world away eating Taco Bell.
    I mean co'mon the world does not change for the west.

    By the way I love Taco Bell.
     
    Last edited: 21 Apr 2006
  5. Anakha

    Anakha Minimodder

    Joined:
    6 Sep 2002
    Posts:
    587
    Likes Received:
    7
    The problem is that if there's a company's branch in china, that's providing the kind of free speech that the chinese government outlaws, then that company is liable just as much as the people themselves. So the question is, does the company do as the country's goverment has legislated, or do they get arrested and jailed themselves, or do they have no presence in that country (And have their "International" site limited and slowed immensely by the government's own enforcement systems).

    So, presuming you actually want some kind of presence in a country with strict rules, you have the option of either adhering to those rules, or getting (the staff at those regional offices) arrested and thrown into jail.
     
  6. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
    I think Google has the best idea. The do business in CHina, but physically maintain their servers elsewhere so that the information on them cannot be subpheonad by the Choineese government. The censor their pages, but tell people they have been censored on a case by case basis. To me this is a corporate version of non-violent resistance and i think it will in the end be very effective. As much as we would like to see the restrictive culture in China change, it cannot be done from without. Instead I think the best path forward is to show the people the alternatives, including "western style democracy", and eventually there will be a critical mass for change from within. The concern I have is that they not leap towards a utopian vision of what democracy should be and land in the festering cesspool of what it is (greed, corruption, etc) and become disillusioned.
     
  7. Kaze22

    Kaze22 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    419
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just cause Google has their servers elsewhere doesn't mean they don't have to abide by China's censorship. The Chinese government never compromises, if you wanna play in their ballpark you play by their rules. It’s just the nature of a communist government.
    I think things will eventually change but it'll only happen when the party allows it to happen, and they're not gonna allow it all to happen at once. Any change will be gradual at best.
    As for a western style democracy in China, I seriously doubt it’ll ever happen; culturally speaking China already has an imperialistic spirit imbued upon them through thousands of years of history and evolution. The western ideals of freedom and individuality will never fly in China.
     
  8. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
    You're right, but you're also missing my point on the servers. Yes, Google has to censor their pages (with a note that says "This page is being censored"), but because the servers are located elsewhere the government cannot force google to give out user information. In other words, it is very unlikley that we will ever read a thread about someone being sentanced to prison because Google told the Chineese government that they were looking at pro-democracy websites.
     
  9. Anakha

    Anakha Minimodder

    Joined:
    6 Sep 2002
    Posts:
    587
    Likes Received:
    7
    Of course not. As Google's web servers are outside China, all the traffic has to go through the Chinese proxy servers (As all other traffic from within China to the outside internet has to), so the Chinese government can simply check their proxy logs to find out what their people have been visiting. No need for Google to give their logs.
     
  10. Nezuji

    Nezuji What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2004
    Posts:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Every major corporation and government in the world is trying to cosy up to China. And you hear them all whispering their mantra to themselves: "Over one billion people! A completely captive market! Imagine the profits!" Seems that they don't think very hard about exactly WHY that market is so captive. LITERALLY captive, come to think of it.

    The Chinese government is just one more massive conglomerate. I don't really see a way around it. I mean, similar strategies are working very well for Microsoft, McDonald's, AT&T, AOL, Time-Warner...

    Funny that the world's largest socialist country (or more specifically, their armed forces) serves double-duty as one of the largest corporations in the global capitalist arena. And don't think that they don't know it.

    Nezuji :)
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page