I have heard of some of the different chipsets such a the nforce2, KT333, KT400, etc. I was wondering if someone could point me towards somewhere that talks about the major difference of the diff chipsets and what advantages/disadvantages they have.
You're unlikely to find a comprehensive analysis on all the chipsets, considering that the ones you mentioned are spaced about a year or so apart (which is a century in the tech world). Also, one thing you have to understand is that the chipset is kind of like a really big axe. It might be able to cut through diamonds or chop down trees with a slight tap of the axehead, but it is upto the user (motherboard manfacturer), to decide what it will be used for. Anyway, very brief, and most likely slightly incorrect run-down. KT333 = Designed by VIA, supports all Socket A procs upto Thoroughbred B (depends on motherboard and BIOS). No frills as far as integrated features (IDE/USB/etc.) KT400 = Supports Barton processors and 166mhz FSB speeds (which the KT333 couldn't, despite the moniker that suggests otherwise). Also uses and improved single-channel memory controller and IIRC USB 2.0 natively. nForce2 = Depending on which you get, nForce2 can either support upto Thoroughbred B or upto Barton if you get the nForce2-400. Utilizes a dual-channel DDR controller, integrates LAN, audio and USB 2.0 onto the chipset itself (along with the usual suspects).
I can't argue with that. I'll just add that if you're looking to buy a motherboard now then go for a good nForce2 board since it's regarding by almost everyone (well, everyone really, just covering myself from flames ) to be the best Socket A chipset available.
