Corsair TwinX DDR500 PC4000

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Mark, 9 Aug 2003.

  1. Mark

    Mark What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    Im running 1024mb of Corsair TwinX DDR500 PC4000 on a DFI lanparty pro875 with a P4 2.4c running at 2.84. Im unsure how to get the best out if the ram I am using. My current settings are: (Bold highligts current setting)

    Dram Timing Selectable: Manual or by spd
    Cas latency time: 2, 2.5 or 3
    Active to precharge delay: 8 , 7,6,5
    Dram ras# to Cas# delay: 4, 3,2
    Dram ras# precharge: 4, 3,2
    Mem frequency for: DDR266, DDR300, DDR400,Auto
    Voltage is set to 2.7

    Also I have a 256mb ATI9800 Pro, in the Bios should I set AGP apature size to 256 instead of 128?

    Any advice you can give would be appriciated

    Regards

    Mark
     
  2. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    13,393
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    you may be able to get tighter timings out of the ram as it isnt quite running at ddr500, try to get the cas latency as low as possible while still keeping it stable, also a little voltage boosy MAY help but the only way to find out it to try it.
     
  3. Kameleon

    Kameleon is watching you...

    Joined:
    29 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    8
    You do know that higher numbers aren't better where the timings are concerned, right? :p
     
  4. Sid

    Sid Banned

    Joined:
    13 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice setup you have there :thumb:

    At the moment, by running the FSB at ~236FSB (12x multiplier) you are actually underclocking the ram (going at a lower speed that it's rated at). I expect that the CPU will do an FSB of 250 (12 * 250 = 3Ghz), which would make the most out of the ram. It's also possible that the RAM can be pushed beyond that towards 550DDR.

    You will get a lot more performance by upping the FSB rather than tweaking the timings. The timings don't really make that much of a difference these days, especially compared to FSB rises.

    So my suggestion is just to gradually move the FSB up really until just before the point where you begin to lose stability.

    If you begin to lose stability before reaching 250FSB, try increasing the core voltage slightly.
     
  5. Mark

    Mark What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Sid,

    Thanks for your reply. The best I can get out of her at the moment is 235FSB. Thats putting an extra 50mv through the CPU. What sort of voltages would I be safe to go up to? Ive tried 245FSB with +150mv but it wouldnt even get past the bios. Am I safe to go beyond this?

    Cheers
     
  6. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    13,393
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    you can put a reasonable amount of voltage on the cpu, i have mine at 1.6 and have no problem with 3.2ghz (on a 2.4) so im rather surprised that yours will not go higher, i suspect that the motherboard cold be holding you back as a 2.4c should overclock like a mofo (and you know how those mofo's overclock :D )
     
  7. Sid

    Sid Banned

    Joined:
    13 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    You could push the core voltage up to as much as 1.85v or even 1.90v and it'd still be fine probably, might decrease the CPU life a bit though. Keep an eye on your temps while doing this though.
     
  8. Mark

    Mark What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    6 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can only go from +150mv to +200mv.....cant get it to work at 240fsb using +150.....not to sure about pushing it to +200 though
     

Share This Page