1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Storage Corsair vs Crucial SSD

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by ArchType, 24 Oct 2011.

  1. PocketDemon

    PocketDemon What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    2,107
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ummmmm... Well the 120GB max iops AS-SSD (incompressible) sequentials are 516 reads & 250 writes... ...vs (again) 510/180 for the 128GB M4.

    Then the M4 is 50MB/s faster for QD64 4K reads & 50MB/s slower for writes (if you actually use that high a QD for anything - OS & general app QD tend to be 3-7 or so it's not a useful figure).

    & the the M4 is 3MB/s quicker for QD1 4K reads & 23MB/s slower for writes (which again isn't a useful figure).


    Now, what you then have to remember is that this is the *worst case scenario* for this SF drive &, unless you're going to be using 99.9% incompressible files on your SSD, they're completely unrealistic - even though you're completely incorrect & the drives trade places 'if' we pretended that these numbers meant something for an OS/apps/games drive.

    [NB similarly, 100% compressible r/w scores from atto are unrealistic.]


    if, instead, we look at some 'slightly' more meaningful data from Anandtech (which i've linked to at least once or twice before) then it's clear that on either a heavy or light workload, the M4 is significantly weaker as a drive...

    Of course noting that both the 128GB M4 & the 120GB 510 lose much of their write speed vs the 256/250GB drives tested, whereas there's minimal difference between the 240GB & 120GB max iops (as shown here & here - obviously looking at the 6Gb/s figures & ignoring the M4 ones as it's the pre 0009 f/w) - which increases the difference in both tests.


    Otherwise, just to be clear, the Octane uses an indilinx controller.
     
    Last edited: 25 Oct 2011

Share This Page